THE CRIMES OF SENATOR EHIGIE EDOBOR A.K.A. "GODWIN" UZAMERE
1. Home2. Once Upon A Time3. Victim's Statement4. My Search for Justice5. Descent into Hell6. U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere7. Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere8. Ignored by Federal Agencies9. Ignored by Nigerian Authorities10. Victims' Loss of Child Support11. The Uzamere Family12. Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere13. John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community14. Hall of Shame15. 1st Judicial Blow By African-American Judge Thomas16. Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye17. Too Many Discrepancies...18. Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions19. Will Sampson Staff Refuse To Help Identity Fraud Victims?20. Law Office of Gladstein & Messinger21. Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide22. Consulate General of Nigeria23. Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu24. Proof of Legal Marriage25. Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud26. Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail27. The Proof...28. Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!29. Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?30. Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere31. Judge Prus -- What Gives?32. Back on Track!33. Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law34. Petitioner's Verified Petition35. Supplemental Verified Petition36. Judge Prus Recuses Himself37. Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice38. Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar39. Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo40. My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin41. Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed42. Open Letters to the FBI43. Open Letter to All U.S. Judges44. Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene45. Tara's Affidavit46. $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries47. Will Fiduciaries Settle?48. New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze49. There Is No Cousin Godwin!50. Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State51. Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye52. Can International Agency Help?53. Chief Judge Wood's Court54. Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?55. Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis56. No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!57. Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?58. Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?59. Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!60. Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!61. Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses62. Appellate Brief pages 24 to end63. No Justice -- No Peace!64. Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel65. Are You A Victim of A Green Card Marriage Scam?66. End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship67. How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney68. Is The End Finally in Sight?69. Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?70. What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?71. How Will NYSDDC Respond?72. Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence73. Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise To The Challenge?74. Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits75. Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption76. Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored By Appellate Division's White Judiciary77. More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY78. Senator Uzamere...You Are The Husband!79. Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look On Idly?80. What will SCOTUS Do?81. Why did they disobey?82. Cabranes' Fraud Upon The Court83. Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?84. New York State Lawsuit for Fraud85. Judge Sunshine Is A Loser86. Judge Sunshine Out of Options87. Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing...88. Petition for Rehearing89. Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah90. Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel91. Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid92. Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk93. Judge Scuccimarra Ruling94. Defendants Have Defaulted95. Will Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel Because Defendants Are Rich Jews?96. New York and Anne B. Carroll97. Lawsuit Against President98. Will Obama Listen?99. Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra100. More Court Shenanigans?101. Howard U. Schmokescreen102. Into the fire...103. What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?104. Housing Court Corruption105. Mayor Bloomberg's Finest106. FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy107. FEGS Gave Victim No Choice108. What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?109. What Will Court of Claims Do?110. Abuse of Religion Not New111. How Wicked Are They?112. What Lies???113. Federal Lawsuit114. Disastrous Results to Appeal115. Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision116. Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans117. FOIA Hiding Evidence118. Congressional Testimony119. Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem120. Uzamere v. USA, et al121. Judicial Whores Willy and Patty122. Uzamere v. USA123. Find an Unbiased Court124. U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens125. Appellate Brief First Circuit126. U.S. Government Hides Prosecution127. A Jewish RICO128. Jews' Demonic Doctrine -- Law of the Moser129. Mishkin Yanks His Own Nuts130. Will African American Victim of Grand Laceny Receive Justice?131. Judicial Ethics Hypocrite132. Jew Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge133. Please save my family!134. Psychopaths135. Jewish Paradigm Put Jews on Top136. Pretender Bharara137. Int'l Complaint Against Israel, United States and Nigeria138. Memorial of Impeachment139. Supplemental Complaint140. Appellate Brief to UN and US141. U.S. Supreme Court Petition -- UN and U.S.142. A Real Man

What Will The New York State Court of Claims Do?
Will Judge Scuccimarra obey the NYS Constitution -- or will he decide in favor of
Court of Claims's more powerful Jewish Judiciary?
Oh yeah -- identity fraud victim gets a phone call from imposters
claiming to be from the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security.  Why?
scuccimarra.jpg
New York Court of Claims
Justice Thomas Scuccimarra

NEW YORK STATE
COURT OF CLAIMS                           
Cheryl D. Uzamere
*                                                                          Claim No.:_______
                            Plaintiff, 
*
         -against-                                                      VERIFIED CLAIM

State of New York                                                 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
*
                            Defendants.              
 

        Claimant Cheryl D. Uzamere, appearing on her own behalf, states and alleges the following:

        1)        That at all times herein relevant, the Claimant was a resident of the State of New York, City of Brooklyn and County of Kings.

        2)        That at all times herein relevant, Defendant State of New York provided and continues to provide funding to the New York State Office of Mental Health.

        3)        That at all times herein relevant, Defendant State of New York, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, provided and continues to provide funds to Federation Employment and Guidance Services, Inc. (hereinafter “FEGS., Inc.), Interfaith Medical Center Continuing Day Treatment Program, New York Psychotherapy and Counseling Center, Catholic Charities' Flatlands Guidance Center and Catholic Charities' Open Door Psychosocial Clubhouse.

        4)        That at all times herein relevant, Claimant is (or was) in receipt of Defendant-funded mental health rehabilitative services.

JURISDICTION

NEW YORK STATE CONSOLIDATED LAWS – COURT OF CLAIMS ACT

        5)       a)        Waiver of immunity from liability. The state hereby waives its immunity from liability and action and hereby assumes liability and consents to have the same determined in accordance with the same rules of law as applied to actions in the supreme court against individuals or corporations, provided the claimant complies with the limitations of this article.

                   b) To hear and determine all matters now pending in the said court of claims.

                   c) To hear and determine a claim of any person, corporation or municipality against the state for...the torts of its officers or employees while acting as such officers or employees, providing the claimant complies with the limitations of this article.

                   d) To render judgment in favor of the claimant...for such sum as should be paid by or to the state.

BACKGROUND FACTS

        6)        Claimant's action arises out of Defendant's recent discovery of Defendant's reason for discharge of and/or implied consent to discharge Claimant, by and on behalf of Defendant State of New York's Office of Mental Health for commission of the halachic/Jewish religious crime of anti-Semitism.

        7)        That Defendant's illegal discharge/implied consent to discharge of Claimant for the commission of a halachic/Jewish religious crime without informing Claimant of the reason for the aforesaid discharge and without allowing Claimant to defend herself against the aforesaid charge violates Defendant's Constitution's due process clause.

        8)        That Defendant's illegal discharge/implied consent to discharge of Claimant for the commission of a halachic/Jewish religious crime violates the New York State Constitution's equal protection clause.

        9)        That Defendant's illegal discharge of Claimant based on the commission of a halachic/Jewish religious crime violates Defendant's Constitution's freedom to worship clause.

        10)        That Defendant's use of New York State's taxpayers' money to discharge Claimant and/or give tacit permission for Claimant to be discharged to promulgate Jewish religious law, when said money should have been used to provide Claimant with mental health rehabilitative services is a flagrant act of fraud on the part of the Defendant.

        11)        That Defendant's use of taxpayer-funded mental health service agencies to intentionally allow their powerful Jewish supervisory employees to ensure that Claimant is intentionally misdiagnosed as having paranoid schizophrenia, and then to falsely use the aforesaid misdiagnosis to discredit Claimant's well-founded complaint against corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Bernard J. Rostanski and Jack Gladstein is a flagrant act of fraud, and an act of demonic cruelty.

        12)        That Defendant's use of its Jewish supervisory staff's great power to coerce less powerful non-Jews not to assist Claimant is a flagrant act of cruelty on the part of Defendant.

        13)        That Defendant's failure to provide Claimant with mental health services combined with crime victim services as Claimant is a victim of immigration fraud and identity fraud, and instead combining the power of Defendant's Office of Mental Health with Defendant's Unified Court System to prevent Claimant from reporting the crimes of corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Bernard J. Rostanski and Jack Gladstein is both an act of fraud and an act of cruelty.

        14)        That violation of Claimant's right to equal protection is an implied cause of action in the manner of Brown v. State of New York, 89 N.Y.2d 172, 674 N.E.2d 1129, 652 N.Y.S.2d 223, 65 USLW 2355 (1996) (citing Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

CLAIMANT'S ASSERTIONS/ALLEGATIONS

        15)        Claimant asserts that while she was (or should have been) in receipt Defendant's government-funded outpatient, mental health rehabilitative services, Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, terminated and/or tacitly gave permission for the termination of Claimant based on Defendant's allegation that Claimant committed a halachic/Jewish religious crime against FEGS, to wit:

        16)        Claimant asserts that on July 17, 2009, Claimant filed an action for fraud against corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Bernard J. Rostanski and Jack Gladstein for their facilitation of Claimant's ex-husband's commission of immigration fraud and identity fraud (see Exhibit A, pages 1-13).

        17)        Claimant asserts that on November 5, 2009, less than four (4) months after Claimant filed her action for fraud against the aforementioned attorneys, Mortimer Zuckerman-owned Daily News, LP and Jewish staff writer Scott Shifrel published an article libeling Claimant as an anti-Semite wacko” (see Exhibit B).

        18)        Claimant asserts that on November 30, 2009, four (4) months after Claimant filed an action for fraud against corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Bernard J. Rostanski and Jack Gladstein; and less than a month after the Daily News libeled Claimant an “anti-Semitic wacko”, Claimant was discharged from receiving FEGS, Inc.'s government-funded services for committing the Jewish religious crime of anti-Semitism (Exhibit C, pages 1-2).

        19)        Claimant asserts that on December 1, 2009, Clifford Nafus, employee of Defendant-funded, Jewish-controlled FEGS, Inc., consented to the aforementioned psychosocial discharge report statement that “given client's history of making anti-Semitic remarks, treatment at an FEGS facility is inappropriate for her” by signing his name on the aforementioned psychosocial discharge report.

        20)        Claimant asserts that on December 4, 2009, Roberta Siegal, who is Jewish, consented to the aforementioned psychosocial discharge report by signing her name on the aforementioned report.

        21)        Claimant asserts that on December 4, 2009, Dr. Howard Forster, who is Jewish, consented to the aforementioned psychosocial discharge report by signing his name on the aforementioned report.

        22)        Claimant asserts that in February 2010, during Claimant' last week with Defendant's Kingsboro Psychiatric Center as an inpatient, Defendant's employee Laurie Velcimé informed Claimant that except for Brookdale Medical Center's outpatient psychiatric department, all the not-for-profit outpatient mental health rehabilitative service agencies with which Ms. Velcimé filed a request for services on behalf of the Claimant turned down Claimant's request.

        23)        Claimant asserts that while she was an inpatient with Defendant's Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, she informed its staff that based on her lawsuit against the four (4) Jewish attorneys who facilitated Claimant's ex-husband's commission of immigration fraud and identity fraud, and based on Claimant's fear of backlash from members of the Jewish community, Claimant would only accept therapy from therapists who were not Jewish.

        24)        Claimant alleges that when she commenced receiving services from Brookdale Medical Hospital's outpatient psychiatry department, she was assigned to a psychiatrist who was Jewish; and that based on Claimant's fear, Claimant stopped attending Brookdale Medical Center's psychiatric clinic.

        25)        Claimant asserts that in May 2010, during her last week with Defendant' Kingsboro Psychiatric Center as an inpatient, Defendant's employee Laurie Velcimé informed Claimant that all the not-for-profit outpatient mental health agencies with which Ms. Velcimé filed a request for services on behalf of the Claimant turned down Claimant's request.

        26)        Claimant asserts that the referenced not-for-profit outpatient mental health rehabilitative service agencies include, but are not limited to: 1) Interfaith Medical Center CDT; 2) Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Center CDT and 3) New York Psychotherapy and Counseling Center.

        27)        Claimant asserts that in May 2010, while she was an inpatient with Defendant's Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, she informed its staff that based on her lawsuit against the four (4) Jewish attorneys who facilitated Claimant's ex-husband's commission of immigration fraud and identity fraud, and based on Claimant's fear of backlash from members of the Jewish community, Claimant would only accept therapy from therapists who were not Jewish.

        28)        Claimant asserts that Defendant's Kingsboro Psychiatric Center's Ward 12 staff honored Claimant's request by providing Claimant with a psychiatric treatment team that contained no Jews (see Exhibit D).

        29)        Claimant asserts that in September 2010, Defendant's Kingsboro Psychiatric Center's Intensive Management Program's caseworker Bridget Davis arranged for Claimant to meet with Defendant-funded outpatient mental health service providers Flatlands Guidance Center and Open Door Psychosocial Club; and that Claimant was made to believe that Defendant's Kingsboro Psychiatric Center would continue to accede to Claimant's request to ensure that the only individuals who would provide Claimant with therapy were non-Jews who were culturally sensitive to Claimant's needs as an African American and as a crime victim.

        30)        Claimant asserts that on three (3) occasions, Defendant, by its intensive case management caseworker Bridget Davis, tricked Claimant into divulging sensitive information to Catholic Charities' employees Monica “Doe”, Dr. Sterling and Dr. Partyka, all of whom attempted to hide the fact that they are Jewish from the Claimant.

        31)        Claimant asserts that after informing Defendant-funded Flatlands Guidance Center and Open Door Psychosocial Club that she would only accept therapy from a therapist who was non-Jewish, an unidentified Jewish male employee informed fellow employees that Claimant is an anti-Semite; and that after weeks of issues with transference, and continued fear and sadness at being identified as anti-Semitic, Claimant left.

        32)        Claimant asserts that in November 2010, she requested her psychiatric records from FEGS, Inc.; that FEGS, Inc., no longer in any logical position, and with no legal reason to defy Defendant's Mental Hygiene Law by continuing to hide its reason for Claimant's discharge from Claimant, acceded to Claimant's request (see Exhibit E); and that Claimant immediately commenced preparing her lawsuit against Defendant based on the recent discovery of Defendant's religious reason for FEGS, Inc.'s discharge of Claimant.

        33)        Claimant strongly asserts that although she suspected that FEGS, Inc.'s reason for discharging her was based in the Daily News' public portrayal of her as an “anti-Semitic wacko”, Claimant, being legally self-trained and familiar with certain aspects of halachic/Jewish religious culture, never imagined that FEGS, Inc., having a legal department or access to attorneys, would be foolish enough to write down anti-Semitism as its reason for discharging Claimant; and that Claimant surmises that the only logical reason for FEGS, Inc.'s writing down anti-Semitism as its reason for discharging Claimant is because of the belief that Claimant would never see the report.

        34)        Claimant asserts that Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, made absolutely no attempt, verbally or in writing, to tell Claimant the reason why she was discharged from its taxpayer-funded outpatient mental health agency; and that further to this, Defendant, by its agency New York State Office of Mental Health, never gave Claimant an opportunity to defend herself against the allegation that Claimant committed a halachic/Jewish religious crime.

        35)        Claimant asserts that Daat Emet's article entitled Gentiles in Halacha, states the following: “the prohibition to hate only applies to Jews. One may hate a gentile”; that “one make take revenge against or hold a grudge towards Gentiles; likewise the commandment “love your neighbor” applies only to Jews, not to Gentiles”; that “anyone who hates a Jew in his heart transgresses a negative commandment”; that also, anyone who hold a grudge against a Jew transgresses a negative commandment; and that “it is a commandment for each and every person to love each and every Jew as he loves himself” (see Exhibit F, pages 1-3).

        36)        Claimant asserts that the article Informing on Jews Who Commit Crimes states that “the Talmud recounts – in a number of places – that is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular government, when their conduct is a violation of secular law...” (see Exhibit G).

        37)        Claimant asserts that based on the above, Claimant's filing of the action for fraud against corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Bernard J. Rostanski and Jack Gladstein with a non-religious, secular court is the act of anti-Semitism for which Claimant is being punished.

        38)        Claimant asserts that every judge within the five (5) boroughs of New York City to whom Claimant has presented her complaint against corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Bernard J. Rostanski and Jack Gladstein has been Jewish; and further to this, the aforesaid Jewish judges have either enjoined Claimant from further litigation or have required Claimant to pay courts fees (see Exhibit H, pages 1-4).

        39)        Claimant asserts that having to pay $340.00 court costs ($80.00 transcript; $210.00, lawsuit against FEGS, Inc.; $50.00 for New York State Court of Claims) along with rent, internet, ink, toner, paper and other costs necessary to proceed with her cases, Claimant now has no money for food and must wait until December 12, 2010 for her food stamps (see Exhibit I).

        40)        Claimant asserts that Defendant's government has become a incubator and sustains a demonic cartel whose members are at liberty to attack any non-Jew – man, woman or child at will – but whose judiciary will invoke the Talmud's prohibition on reporting the wrongdoing of any member of the Jewish community to the secular authorities, and that there is no way for any non-Jew who has no political clout or money to fight back (see Exhibit J).

        41)        Claimant asserts that the Defendant's Office of Mental Health is also under the demonic grip of the aforesaid religious cartel; and that members of the aforementioned cartel who are employed with Defendant's Office of Mental Health will continue to ensure that Claimant is prohibited from reporting the crimes of corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Bernard J. Rostanski and Jack Gladstein until Claimant is dead.

        42)        That Claimant respectfully reminds this Court that by the time it is in receipt of this Claim, Claimant will already have forwarded it to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Civil Rights based on Claimant's belief that Defendant's Office of Mental Health receives funding from the aforesaid federal agency, and based on Claimant's assertion that the Defendant has fraudulently used federal money to advance the cause of Judaism, and to invoke the Talmudic doctrine prohibiting Jews from reporting the crimes of fellow Jews to secular authorities.

VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION'S

DUE PROCESS , EQUAL PROTECTION FREEDOM TO WORSHIP CLAUSES
AND AS FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

        43)        Claimant hereby repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 42 as if fully set forth herein.

        44)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, owed Claimant the duty of allowing Claimant to use its Defendant-funded mental health service agencies, Inc. to receive outpatient mental health services equally as it does with mentally disabled clients who are Jews.

        45)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, owed Claimant the duty of requiring its Defendant-funded mental health service agency to tell Claimant the reason for its discharge of Claimant so as to give Claimant the same equal protection to appeal Defendant's agency's decision as it does to its mentally disabled clients who are Jewish.

        46)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, owed Claimant the duty to require its Defendant-funded mental health service agency to limit its description of the Claimant to objective, psychiatric, psychosocial criteria as outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and to not describe Claimant based on Defendant's Jewish cartel's religious laws.

        47)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, owed Claimant the duty of protecting Claimant's right to equal protection under the law by ensuring that its Defendant-funded mental health service agencies prepared Claimant's psychiatric/psychosocial report in a manner consistent with Defendant's laws and industry criteria; and not with incendiary words that would make readers who are Jewish angry with Claimant, and readers who are not Jewish feel coerced to agree with employees who are Jewish for fear of being subjected to the same retaliation from Defendant's Jewish cartel that Claimant now experiences.

        49)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, owed Claimant the duty of providing a culturally sensitive, caring environment in which Claimant could talk about the crimes that were committed against her by corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Bernard J. Rostanski and Jack Gladstein; and not an environment that punished Claimant as an anti-Semite for speaking with therapists about the crimes that were committed against Claimant's family by the aforesaid attorneys.

        50)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, owed Claimant the duty of ensuring that its taxpayer-funded outpatient, mental health service agencies used funds provided by Defendant to diagnose Claimant based on Defendant's lawful and industry-accepted criteria; and that Defendant owed Claimant the duty to ensure that taxpayer-funded outpatient, mental health services were not fraudulently used to misdiagnose Claimant based on the religious desires and retaliatory whims of Defendant's powerful Jewish cartel.

        51)        That wholly and solely as a result of the tortious acts of Defendant's Office of Mental Health, Claimant suffered personal injuries by way of violation of Claimant's right to equal protection, violation of Claimant's right to due process of law, violation of Claimant's right to freedom to worship, public scorn, difficulty in securing outpatient mental health services and severe mental and emotional distress for which Claimant was damaged in the amount of $100,000,000.00.

AS AND FOR A SECOND SEPARATE AND DISTINCT CAUSE OF ACTION

        52)        Claimant hereby repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 51 as if fully set forth herein.

        53)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, failed in its duty to provide Claimant with taxpayer-funded mental health service equally, as it does with mentally disabled clients who are Jews.

        54)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, failed in its duty to tell Claimant the reason for its discharge of Claimant so as to give Claimant the same equal protection to appeal Defendant's agency's decision as it does to its mentally disabled clients who are Jewish.

        55)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, failed in its duty to require its taxpayer-funded mental health service agencies to limit its description of the Claimant based on Defendant's legal criteria, and Defendant's professional description of Claimant based on objective, psychiatric, psychosocial industry-accepted standards as outlined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and to not describe Claimant based on Defendant's Jewish cartel's religious laws and retaliatory whims.

        56)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, failed in its duty to protect Claimant's right to equal protection under the law by tacitly giving its permission to allow Claimant's psychiatric/psychosocial report to be prepared in a manner not consistent with Defendant's laws and industry-accepted criteria; but instead with incendiary words that angered Jewish therapists and made less powerful non-Jewish therapists feel coerced to agree with employees who are Jewish for fear of being subjected to the same retaliation from Defendant's powerful Jewish cartel that Claimant now experiences.

        57)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, failed in its duty to Claimant by subjecting her to culturally in sensitive, uncaring environment that failed to be empathetic with Claimant based on the crimes that were committed against her by corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Bernard J. Rostanski and Jack Gladstein; and by subjecting Claimant to an environment that punished Claimant as an anti-Semite for speaking with therapists about the crimes that were committed against Claimant's family by the aforesaid attorneys.

        58)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, failed in its duty to ensure that its taxpayer-funded outpatient, mental health service agencies used Defendant's funds to diagnose Claimant based on Defendant's lawful and industry-accepted criteria; and that Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, failed in its duty to ensure that taxpayer-funded outpatient, mental health services were not fraudulently used to misdiagnose Claimant based on religious laws and retaliatory whims of Defendant's powerful Jewish cartel.

        59)        That wholly and solely as a result of Defendants' tortious acts, Claimant suffered personal injuries by way of violation of Claimant's right to equal protection under the law, violation of Claimant's right to due process of law, violation of Claimant's right to freedom of worship; public scorn, difficulty in securing outpatient mental health services and severe mental and emotional distress for which Claimant was damaged in the amount of $100,000,000.00.

AS AND FOR A THIRD SEPARATE AND DISTINCT CAUSE OF ACTION

        60)        Claimant hereby repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 59 as if fully set forth herein.

        61)        That Claimant suffered public scorn because of Defendant's tacit permission to publish Claimant defamatory psychosocial history to others.

        62)        That Claimant suffered public scorn based on Defendant's tacit permission for outpatient mental health service providers to turn Claimant down based on their belief that Claimant committed the halachic/Jewish crime of anti-Semitism.

        63)        That Claimant suffered public scorn based on Defendant's failure to tell Claimant that she was branded by an agency Defendant funds as an anti-Semite so as to allow Claimant to implement legal procedures established by its Office of Mental Health, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and its subsidiary the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to be able to defend against Defendants' defamatory description of Claimant's psychosocial history.

        64)        That Claimant suffered public scorn based on Defendants' vague description of Claimant's religious crime; that Jewish supervisors of other outpatient mental health service providers were left to believe that Claimant “has a history of making anti-Semitic remarks” but were not told what remarks Claimant made there were anti-Semitic.

        65)        That Claimant will continue to suffer insofar as the “diagnosis” anti-Semite” is a lifelong title for which Claimant will never be able to escape; and that will render Claimant persona non grata with Jewish-controlled outpatient mental health service providers until the day that Claimant dies.

        66) That Claimant has suffered public scorn to the point where Claimant is unable to be found eligible by Jewish-owned/Jewish-controlled outpatient mental health service agencies based on the Defendant's religiously-oriented defamation of Claimant as “anti-Semitic.”

        67)        That wholly and solely as a result of Defendants' tortious acts, Claimant suffered personal injuries by way of violation of Claimant's right to equal protection under the law; violation of Claimant's right to due process of law; violation to Claimant's right to freedom to practice her own religion and not be burdened with what Claimant sees is Defendant's state religion; public scorn and severe mental and emotional distress for which Claimant was damaged in the amount of $100,000,000.00.

AS AND FOR A FOURTH SEPARATE AND DISTINCT CAUSE OF ACTION

        68)        Claimant hereby repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 67 as if fully set forth herein.

        69)        That Defendant, by and through the New York State Office of Mental Health, gave its tacit permission to defame Claimant and terminate its services to Claimant based on its taxpayer-funded, outpatient mental health service provider's description of Claimant as an anti-Semitic; and caused Claimant to be unable to exercise her right to due process of law, and her right to equal protection under the law; and that Claimant's inability to avail herself of her right to equal protection under Defendant's laws is an injury unto itself, and gives rise to an implied cause of action in the nature of Brown v. State of New York, 89 N.Y.2d 172 (1996) (citing Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

        70)        That loss of reputation based on the stigma of being publicly labeled an anti-Semitic is an injury that is recognized in law.

        71)        That the permanent loss of Defendant's mental health rehabilitative services as controlled by members of Defendant's Jewish cartel, and funded by Defendant's Office of Mental Health in an injury recognized in law; and that Defendant's refusal to address taxpayer-funded outpatient mental health service providers' fraudulent use of Defendant's funds is an injury both to the Claimant and to the taxpayers of New York State, and as such is recognized in law.

        72)        That wholly and solely as a result of Defendants' tortious acts, Claimant suffered personal injuries by way of violation of Claimant's right to equal protection under the law; violation of Plaintiff's right to due process of law; violation of Claimant's right to freedom to practice her own religion and not be burdened with what Claimants asserts is now the Defendant's official religion, for which Claimant was damaged in the amount of $100,000,000.00.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

        73)        Claimant respectfully prays for this honorable Court to present Claimant's action for constitutional violations to a jury for the purpose of holding a trial.

        74)        Claimant respectfully prays that this Court obeys 22 NYCRR §100.3(E) such that any and all members of Defendant's judiciary who are Jewish be required to disqualify themselves from adjudicating this action; and that further this, Claimant emphatically states that based on what she believes to be irrefutable evidence of Defendant's fraudulent use of public funds to allow the promulgation of Judaism, Claimant will present this claim with a letter of warning to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Right so that the aforesaid federal agency can see the actions of Defendant's corrupt judiciary as they employ schemes and artifices to defraud the federal government so as to continue to invoke the Talmudic Law of the Moser to continue to prevent Claimant from reporting the crimes of corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Bernard J. Rostanski and Jack Gladstein to Defendant.

        WHEREFORE, Claimant Cheryl D. Uzamere respectfully prays this Court for a jury trial, and to render judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $100,000.000.00 or a sum that to this Court is deemed to be just and proper.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York
            December 6, 2011

STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF KINGS     ) ss:

I, Cheryl D. Uzamere, am the Claimant in the within Verified Claim. I have read the foregoing complaint and know the contents thereof. The contents are true to my own knowledge except as to matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true.

mysignature2.jpg

Exhibit D, page 1

FEGSpsychosocialpg1.jpg

Exhibit D, page 3

FEGSpsychosocialpg2.jpg

Exhibit D, page 4

gentilesinhalachapg1.jpg

Exhibit D, page 5

gentilesinhalachapg2.jpg

Exhibit D, page 6

gentilesinhalachapg3.jpg

Exhibit D, page 7

informingonJews.jpg