THE CRIMES OF SENATOR EHIGIE EDOBOR A.K.A. "GODWIN" UZAMERE
1. Home2. Once Upon A Time3. Victim's Statement4. My Search for Justice5. Descent into Hell6. U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere7. Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere8. Ignored by Federal Agencies9. Ignored by Nigerian Authorities10. Victims' Loss of Child Support11. The Uzamere Family12. Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere13. John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community14. Hall of Shame15. 1st Judicial Blow By African-American Judge Thomas16. Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye17. Too Many Discrepancies...18. Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions19. Will Sampson Staff Refuse To Help Identity Fraud Victims?20. Law Office of Gladstein & Messinger21. Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide22. Consulate General of Nigeria23. Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu24. Proof of Legal Marriage25. Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud26. Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail27. The Proof...28. Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!29. Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?30. Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere31. Judge Prus -- What Gives?32. Back on Track!33. Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law34. Petitioner's Verified Petition35. Supplemental Verified Petition36. Judge Prus Recuses Himself37. Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice38. Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar39. Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo40. My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin41. Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed42. Open Letters to the FBI43. Open Letter to All U.S. Judges44. Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene45. Tara's Affidavit46. $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries47. Will Fiduciaries Settle?48. New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze49. There Is No Cousin Godwin!50. Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State51. Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye52. Can International Agency Help?53. Chief Judge Wood's Court54. Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?55. Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis56. No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!57. Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?58. Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?59. Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!60. Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!61. Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses62. Appellate Brief pages 24 to end63. No Justice -- No Peace!64. Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel65. Are You A Victim of A Green Card Marriage Scam?66. End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship67. How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney68. Is The End Finally in Sight?69. Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?70. What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?71. How Will NYSDDC Respond?72. Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence73. Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise To The Challenge?74. Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits75. Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption76. Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored By Appellate Division's White Judiciary77. More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY78. Senator Uzamere...You Are The Husband!79. Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look On Idly?80. What will SCOTUS Do?81. Why did they disobey?82. Cabranes' Fraud Upon The Court83. Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?84. New York State Lawsuit for Fraud85. Judge Sunshine Is A Loser86. Judge Sunshine Out of Options87. Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing...88. Petition for Rehearing89. Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah90. Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel91. Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid92. Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk93. Judge Scuccimarra Ruling94. Defendants Have Defaulted95. Will Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel Because Defendants Are Rich Jews?96. New York and Anne B. Carroll97. Lawsuit Against President98. Will Obama Listen?99. Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra100. More Court Shenanigans?101. Howard U. Schmokescreen102. Into the fire...103. What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?104. Housing Court Corruption105. Mayor Bloomberg's Finest106. FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy107. FEGS Gave Victim No Choice108. What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?109. What Will Court of Claims Do?110. Abuse of Religion Not New111. How Wicked Are They?112. What Lies???113. Federal Lawsuit114. Disastrous Results to Appeal115. Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision116. Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans117. FOIA Hiding Evidence118. Congressional Testimony119. Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem120. Uzamere v. USA, et al121. Judicial Whores Willy and Patty122. Uzamere v. USA123. Find an Unbiased Court124. U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens125. Appellate Brief First Circuit126. U.S. Government Hides Prosecution127. A Jewish RICO128. Jews' Demonic Doctrine -- Law of the Moser129. Mishkin Yanks His Own Nuts130. Will African American Victim of Grand Laceny Receive Justice?131. Judicial Ethics Hypocrite132. Jew Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge133. Please save my family!134. Psychopaths135. Jewish Paradigm Put Jews on Top136. Pretender Bharara137. Int'l Complaint Against Israel, United States and Nigeria138. Memorial of Impeachment139. Supplemental Complaint140. Appellate Brief to UN and US141. U.S. Supreme Court Petition -- UN and U.S.142. A Real Man

Desperate Justice Sunshine Running Out of Options
Arranges for Two New York State Court Employees to Use Force to
Prevent Plaintiff from Filing Notice to Appeal His Felonious Decision
 uzamerewalkerfamily.jpg

judgeradixmemocover.jpg
noticeofappeal3.jpg
judgeradixmemopg2.jpg
noticeofappeal2.jpg

appellateosc.jpg

Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Cheryl D. Uzamere                                              App. Div. Docket No.: 2009-01119

                       Plaintiff-Appellant,

    -against-

Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere a.k.a.

“Godwin E. Uzamere"

                       Defendant-Respondent.

________________________________

STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF KINGS      ) ss:

        I,      Cheryl D. Uzamere, being duly sworn, depose and say that:

        1)     I am the Plaintiff-Appellant in the above entitled action.

        2)     I respectfully remind this honorable Court that writ of certiorari docket number 09-5816 is pending before the Supreme Court of the United States, in which I presented irrefutable evidence of Judge Sunshine's violation of my Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, his violation of 18 U.S.C. §241 and 242, and his violation of federal case law as it pertains to fraud before the court, and for which attorneys for the New York City, New York State and the U.S. Solicitor General waived their right to respond (see attached as Government Exhibits 1-3).

        3)    That if I am granted an audience, my first order of business will be to see to the arrest of Judge Sunshine based on his violation of the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, his commission of 18 U.S.C. §241 and §241, and his act of fraud upon the court, in violation of federal case law (Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968).

        4)     I make this Affidavit in support of my Order to Show Cause based on the following statements:

        5)     That the issues as presented in Judge Sunshine's Memorandum and Order dated September 8, 2009 are in blatant violation of the aforesaid federal laws.

        6)     That the following issues as presented in Judge Sunshine's Memorandum and Order dated September 8, 2009 are already on appeal, or will be handled by the appeal:

                a)     Correspondence dated June 12, 2009 from T. Diane Cejka, Director of the Freedom of Information office of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship and Immigration Service regarding the Defendant-Respondent, hereby attached as Exhibit A.

                b)     New York City Human Resources Administration agreement for Plaintiff-Appellant to return child support payments that Plaintiff-Appellant signed as a prerequisite to receiving public assistance, hereby attached as Exhibit B.

                c)      That attached to the aforesaid correspondence is HRA's notice of status of application in which Plaintiff-Appellant is listed as an “ADC” (Aid to Dependent Children) recipient, hereby attached as Exhibit C.

                d)     That attached to the aforesaid correspondence is an arrest warrant for non-payment of child support against Defendant-Respondent issued under the fictitious name “Godwin E. Uzamere”, hereby attached as Exhibit D.

                e)     That attached to the aforesaid correspondence are two letters addressed to Plaintiff-Appellant from the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service bearing immigration file number A35-201-224; said file number issued based upon Defendant-Respondent's real name, hereby attached as Exhibit E and Exhibit F.

                f)      That attached to the aforesaid correspondence is a letter from the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service bearing immigration file number A24-027-764; said file number issued based upon Defendant-Respondent's fictitious name “Godwin E. Uzamere”, hereby attached as Exhibit G.

                g)     That on October 7, 2008, Eugene O. Uzamere, Esq., submitted a falsified counter-affidavit from Nigeria that was not authenticated by the U.S. Department of State's Embassy in Nigeria, alleging that Plaintiff-Appellant was married to Defendant-Respondent's cousin, hereby attached as Exhibit H.

               h)     That in October 2008, Plaintiff-Appellant received correspondence concerning Defendant-Respondent from Eugenia Cowles, Assistant U.S. Attorney in Vermont and Rachel McCarthy, Bar Counsel of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Citizenship and Immigration Service in Vermont in which Rachel McCarthy stated that “IR2 fraudulently obtained because he (defendant) was married at the time”, hereby attached as Exhibit I.

               i)     That in Judge Sunshine's Decision and Order dated January 12, 2009 he stated that “...plaintiff is not entitled to...retroactive child support”; and “...there is conflicting evidence regarding whether plaintiff was married to defendant, or his alleged cousin “Godwin Uzamere...this threshold issue involving the very existence of the marriage must be resolved before the court can rule on questions of spousal support and economic discovery since this matters will be be relevant if it is ultimately determined that plaintiff and defendant were married”, hereby attached as Exhibit J.

               j)     That on January 20, 2009, Plaintiff-Appellant sent an e-mail to the Honorable Robin Renee Sanders, U.S. Ambassador to Nigeria and to the FBI's Legal Attaché in Nigeria to prevent Defendant-Respondent and Judge Sunshine from allowing an unknown individual to videotape himself from Nigeria, hereby attached as Exhibit K.

               k)     That on January 30, 2009, Plaintiff-Appellant received an e-mail from the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria that stated that “notarial services are available to all U.S. passport holders and to foreign nationals for documents destined to be used in the United States...the only notary public in Nigeria that is recognized in the United States is a U.S. Consular Office at the Embassy”, hereby attached as Exhibit L.

               l)     That on May 12, 2009, Judge Sunshine stated in his Decision and Order that “the defendant is the husband in conformity with the parties marriage on November 21, 1979” and that “defendant is declared in default for failure to appear at the hearing”, hereby attached as Exhibit M.

        7)    That Judge Sunshine held an illegal “trial” of all issues on July 7, 2009, in spite of his Decision and Order declaring Defendant-Respondent in default, in which Defendant-Respondent did not appear.

       8)    That although Plaintiff-Appellant submitted the arrest warrant for nonpayment of child support that was issued against Defendant-Respondent, Judge Sunshine refuses to openly acknowledge Plaintiff-Appellant's due process right to receive retroactive child support.

        9)    That although Judge Sunshine declared that Defendant-Respondent has defaulted, Judge Sunshine refuses to render any decision with regard to Plaintiff-Appellant's request for present and retroactive child and spousal support.

       10)   That although Judge Sunshine declared that Defendant-Respondent “is the husband in conformity with the parties' marriage on November 21, 2009,” Judge Sunshine refuses to render any decision with regard to Plaintiff-Appellant's request for retroactive child and spousal support.

       11)   That although Plaintiff-Appellant's U.S. Supreme Court writ of certiorari, docket number 09-5816 in Judge Sunshine knows he is a defendant, Judge Sunshine has refused to recuse himself.

       12)   That Judge Sunshine is a member of a religion that advocates the Talmudic belief that Jews should not report each others' crimes to non-Jews, hereby attached as Exhibit N.

       13)   That the U.S. Department's of Justice's meaning of domestic violence is defined as “a pattern of abusive behavior in any relationship that is used by one partner to gain or maintain power and control over another intimate partner”; and describes economic abuse, that is, “withholding one's access to money” as a form of domestic violence.

       14)   That H.R. 3402-20 Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, Section 105 entitled “Violence Against Women Act Court Training and Improvements states that its purpose is for, inter alia: “...to award grants to improve court responses...practices, and procedures...education for court-based and court-related personnel on issues relating to victims’ needs, including...safety, security...economic independence.

       15)   That the New York State Unified Court System, Committee on Matrimonial Practice, of which Judge Sunshine is an active member, states that “the Committee on Matrimonial Practice is an advisory group...which...assesses the need for...the development of practices to assist litigants...in the timely and productive management of matrimonial matters.”

       16)    That Judge Sunshine has flagrantly, and without remorse violated: 1) Plaintiff-Appellant's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of and equal protection under the law; 2) H.R. 3402-20 regarding violence against women; 3) 22 C.F.R. §92.65 regarding the court's duty to commission a U.S. consular officer to establish the genuineness of foreign documents; 4) 18 U.S.C. §1001(a)(1)(2)(3) regarding “the use of matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States” by accepting a fraudulent foreign document as genuine; 5) NYCRR §202.16 regarding preliminary conferences by fraudulently stating that Defendant participated in a preliminary conference when he did not; 6) CPLR §3215 and NYCRR §202.27 regarding default judgments by holding a “trial” for the Defendant although declaring that the Defendant had defaulted; 7) PEN §175.35 regarding the submission of false instruments for filing with a public office by accepting fraudulent documents to be used and accepted as genuine in a New York State court; and has, in violation of his duties as a member of New York State's Matrimonial Committee, failed to develop practices to assist Plaintiff-Appellant in the “timely and productive management” of her divorce action.

       17)   That based on Plaintiff-Appellant's irrefutable proof of Judge Sunshine's “failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest; deceitfulness, as indicated by repeatedly lying; reckless disregard for safety of self or others and lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another”; Judge Sunshine's behavior fits the American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' diagnosis for antisocial personality disorder (also known as psychopath/sociopath), such that, nearly two years and seventeen (17) adjournments later -- for which Defendant-Respondent never interposed an answer and never appeared -- Plaintiff-Appellant believes that Judge Sunshine lacks the empathy, moral fiber and respect for law to render a final judgment in Plaintiff-Appellant's case; and that his status as an adherent of the Talmudic prohibition against reporting the crimes of fellow Jews to the secular authorities further exacerbates his recalcitrance and rationalizes his mistreatment of Plaintiff-Appellant, who Judge Sunshine perceives as a worthless schvartze with no (Talmudic) rights that any self-respecting Jewish judge is bound to respect.

       18)   That in spite of Plaintiff-Appellant's cries for help, Judge Sunshine has failed to enforce Plaintiff-Appellant's rights to due process and equal protection so that Plaintiff-Appellant can receive the child and spousal support she never received as a result of Defendant's continued acts of fraud; and that Judge Sunshine's commission of the aforesaid constitutional torts continue to force Plaintiff-Appellant and her children to be victims of domestic violence, for which Plaintiff-Appellant is now a mental health patient, and for which Plaintiff-Appellant filed her writ of certiorari docket.

       19)  That Plaintiff-Appellant knows that New York's divorce statute directs courts to consider certain acts of misconduct as "so egregious or uncivilized as to bespeak of a blatant disregard of the marital relationship; misconduct that shocks the conscience of the court, thereby compelling it to invoke its equitable power to do justice between the parties; and that Judge Sunshine refuses to openly acknowledge that Defendant-Appellee's marriage of Plaintiff-Appellant with a false name for the sole purpose of illegally circumventing U.S. immigration law, Defendant-Appellee's abandonment of Plaintiff-Appellant when she was pregnant with their daughter and his 30-year refusal to pay even one penny in child support renders both Defendant-Appellee's and Judge Sunshine's conduct as egregious.

        WHEREFORE, Plaintiff desperately begs this honorable Court's mercy to grant leave for Plaintiff-Appellant to proceed as a poor person, to grant preference to hear Plaintiff-Appellant's case expeditiously, to vacate Judge Sunshine's illegal Decision and Order and to consolidate all issues so that Plaintiff-Appellant's 30-year-green-card-oriented marriage and the resultant economic and emotional reign of terror that Defendant-Respondent and Judge Sunshine have inflicted on Plaintiff-Appellant and her children can finally come to an end.

Dated: August 14, 2009

mysignature2.jpg

Cheryl D. Uzamere

PLEASE NOTE:  All exhibits can be found throughout the website