THE CRIMES OF SENATOR EHIGIE EDOBOR A.K.A. "GODWIN" UZAMERE
1. Home2. Once Upon A Time3. Victim's Statement4. My Search for Justice5. Descent into Hell6. U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere7. Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere8. Ignored by Federal Agencies9. Ignored by Nigerian Authorities10. Victims' Loss of Child Support11. The Uzamere Family12. Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere13. John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community14. Hall of Shame15. 1st Judicial Blow By African-American Judge Thomas16. Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye17. Too Many Discrepancies...18. Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions19. Will Sampson Staff Refuse To Help Identity Fraud Victims?20. Law Office of Gladstein & Messinger21. Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide22. Consulate General of Nigeria23. Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu24. Proof of Legal Marriage25. Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud26. Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail27. The Proof...28. Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!29. Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?30. Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere31. Judge Prus -- What Gives?32. Back on Track!33. Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law34. Petitioner's Verified Petition35. Supplemental Verified Petition36. Judge Prus Recuses Himself37. Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice38. Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar39. Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo40. My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin41. Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed42. Open Letters to the FBI43. Open Letter to All U.S. Judges44. Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene45. Tara's Affidavit46. $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries47. Will Fiduciaries Settle?48. New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze49. There Is No Cousin Godwin!50. Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State51. Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye52. Can International Agency Help?53. Chief Judge Wood's Court54. Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?55. Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis56. No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!57. Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?58. Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?59. Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!60. Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!61. Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses62. Appellate Brief pages 24 to end63. No Justice -- No Peace!64. Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel65. Are You A Victim of A Green Card Marriage Scam?66. End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship67. How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney68. Is The End Finally in Sight?69. Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?70. What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?71. How Will NYSDDC Respond?72. Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence73. Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise To The Challenge?74. Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits75. Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption76. Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored By Appellate Division's White Judiciary77. More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY78. Senator Uzamere...You Are The Husband!79. Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look On Idly?80. What will SCOTUS Do?81. Why did they disobey?82. Cabranes' Fraud Upon The Court83. Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?84. New York State Lawsuit for Fraud85. Judge Sunshine Is A Loser86. Judge Sunshine Out of Options87. Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing...88. Petition for Rehearing89. Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah90. Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel91. Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid92. Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk93. Judge Scuccimarra Ruling94. Defendants Have Defaulted95. Will Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel Because Defendants Are Rich Jews?96. New York and Anne B. Carroll97. Lawsuit Against President98. Will Obama Listen?99. Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra100. More Court Shenanigans?101. Howard U. Schmokescreen102. Into the fire...103. What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?104. Housing Court Corruption105. Mayor Bloomberg's Finest106. FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy107. FEGS Gave Victim No Choice108. What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?109. What Will Court of Claims Do?110. Abuse of Religion Not New111. How Wicked Are They?112. What Lies???113. Federal Lawsuit114. Disastrous Results to Appeal115. Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision116. Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans117. FOIA Hiding Evidence118. Congressional Testimony119. Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem120. Uzamere v. USA, et al121. Judicial Whores Willy and Patty122. Uzamere v. USA123. Find an Unbiased Court124. U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens125. Appellate Brief First Circuit126. U.S. Government Hides Prosecution127. A Jewish RICO128. Jews' Demonic Doctrine -- Law of the Moser129. Mishkin Yanks His Own Nuts130. Will African American Victim of Grand Laceny Receive Justice?131. Judicial Ethics Hypocrite132. Jew Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge133. Please save my family!134. Psychopaths135. Jewish Paradigm Put Jews on Top136. Pretender Bharara137. Int'l Complaint Against Israel, United States and Nigeria138. Memorial of Impeachment139. Supplemental Complaint140. Appellate Brief to UN and US141. U.S. Supreme Court Petition -- UN and U.S.142. A Real Man

Even Satan Gives Potential Victims a Choice
FEGS, by its employees, Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D. and Clifford Nafus gave mentally disabled identity fraud victim no choice to defend herself because they didn't tell her that they charged her with the religious crime of anti-Semitism.
 CherylsFamily.jpg
 Roberta, Howard and Cliff:  Stop bitchin' like a little girl!  No matter how bad you believe you look (and you do), I gave you the choice to defend yourselves.  You didn't give it to me. Which one of you idiots lied and told Yitzhaak that I hate Jews??? He stopped calling me and so did his mother!!!  Go to hell!!!

Date Summons filed, February __, 2011. Plaintiff designates Brooklyn as the place of trial. The basis of venue is Defendants' place of business

 

 

 

____________________________________________________

Cheryl D. Uzamere
                                                                                             SUMMONS
*
                            Plaintiff,                                                     Plaintiff resides at:
                                                                                             1209 Loring Avenue
         -against-                                                                        Apt. 6B
                                                                                             Brooklyn, NY 11208

Federation Employment and Guidance
Services, Inc. also known as "FEGS,
Inc., Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster,
M.D. and Clifford Nafus
*
                            Defendants.              

        YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to serve a notice of appearance on the Plaintiff OR  Plaintiff’s Attorney within twenty (20) days after the service of this Summons, exclusive of the day of service, or within thirty (30) days after the service is completed (if this Summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case of your failure to appear, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the notice set forth below.

Dated: February __, 2011

NOTICE: The nature of this action is based on:  Defamation; tolling of statute of limitations based on discovery.
*
The relief sought is: $10,000,000.00.

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT
COUNTY OF KINGS                           
Cheryl D. Uzamere
*                                                                          Index No.:_______
                            Plaintiff, 
*                                                                          VERIFIED COMPLAINT
         -against-
                                                                         JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Federation Employment and Guidance
Services, Inc. also known as "FEGS,
Inc., Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster,
M.D. and Clifford Nafus
*
                            Defendants.              

        Plaintiff Cheryl D. Uzamere, appearing on her own behalf, states and alleges the following:

        1)     That at all times herein relevant, the Plaintiff was a resident of the State of New York, City of Brooklyn and County of Kings.

        2)     That while Plaintiff was registered as an outpatient and in receipt of government-funded mental health rehabilitation services from Defendants, Defendant Federation Employment and Guidance Services, Inc. (hereinafter “FEGS, Inc.”), by its employees Roberta Siegel, Assistant Vice President, Dr. Howard Forester, Psychiatrist and Clifford Nafus, Rehabilitation Technician committed defamation per se against Plaintiff, to wit:

        3)     That on December 1, 2009, Defendant Clifford Nafus consented to Plaintiff's psychosocial history as prepared by Defendants which states that “given client's history of making anti-Semitic remarks, treatment at an FEGS facility is inappropriate for her” by signing his name on the aforementioned psychosocial history (Exhibit A, pages 1-2).

        4)     That on December 4, 2009, Defendants Roberta Siegal and Howard Forster, M.D consented to the aforesaid psychosocial history by signing their name on the aforementioned psychosocial history.

AND AS FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

        5)     Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 4 as if fully set forth herein.

        6)        That Defendant FEGS, Inc., by employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus owed Plaintiff the duty of not using untrue, irrelevant, defamatory words that Defendants knew would be passed on to other mental health service providers.

        7)     That Defendant FEGS, by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus owed Plaintiff the duty of telling Plaintiff of their belief so as to give Plaintiff, an outpatient in a government-funded mental health rehabilitation program, the New-York-State-Constitution-due-process and equal protection rights to avail herself of legal procedures established by the New York State Office of Mental Health, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and its subsidiary the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration so as to be able to defend herself against Defendants' defamatory allegation.

        8)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc., by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus, had a duty not to publicly defame Plaintiff by accusing Plaintiff with violating a halachic/Jewish religious law that requires non-Jews to love all Jews, while in a taxpayer-funded, secular setting (see Exhibit B, 1-3).

        9)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc., by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus owed Plaintiff the duty not to conspire with each other to facilitate the defamation of the Plaintiff.

        10)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc., by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus owed Plaintiff the duty of limiting its description of the Plaintiff to objective, psychiatric, psychosocial criteria, and to not describe Plaintiff based on their own personal, halachic/Jewish religious criteria.

        11)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc, by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus who are experts in the field of mental health, owed Plaintiff the duty of not describing Plaintiff to others in a way that would cause them to think and act negatively toward the Plaintiff, thereby inflicting mental and emotional distress on the Plaintiff.

        12)     That wholly and solely as a result of Defendants' tortious acts, Plaintiff suffered personal injuries by way of public scorn, difficulty in securing outpatient mental health services and severe mental and emotional distress for which Plaintiff was damaged in the amount of $10,000,000.00.

AS AND FOR A SECOND SEPARATE AND DISTINCT CAUSE OF ACTION

        13)     Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 12 as if fully set forth herein.

        14)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc., by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus failed in their duty to not use untrue, irrelevant, defamatory words in Plaintiff's psychosocial history that Defendants knew would be passed on to other mental health service providers.

        15)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc., by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus, failed in their duty to tell Plaintiff of their belief so as to give Plaintiff, an outpatient in a government-funded mental health rehabilitation program, the New-York-State-Constitution-due-process and equal protection rights to avail herself of legal procedures established by New York State Office of Mental Health, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and its subsidiary the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to be able to defend herself against Defendants' defamatory allegation.

        16)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc., by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus, failed in their duty not to publicly defame Plaintiff with violating halachic/Jewish religious law that requires non-Jews to love Jews while in a taxpayer-funded, secular setting.

        17)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc., by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus failed in their duty to not conspire with each other to facilitate the defamation of the Plaintiff.

        18)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc., by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus failed in their duty to limit their description of the Plaintiff to objective, psychiatric, psychosocial criteria as established by the the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), instead of their own personal, halachic/Jewish religious criteria.

        19)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc., by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus, experts in the field of mental health, failed in their duty to not describe Plaintiff to others in a way that would cause them to think and act negatively toward the Plaintiff, thereby inflicting mental and emotional distress on the Plaintiff.

        20)      That wholly and solely as a result of Defendants' tortious acts, Plaintiff suffered personal injuries by way of public scorn, difficulty in securing outpatient mental health services and severe mental and emotional distress for which Plaintiff was damaged in the amount of $10,000,000.00.

AS AND FOR A THIRD SEPARATE AND DISTINCT CAUSE OF ACTION

        21)     Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 20 as if fully set forth herein.

        22)     That Plaintiff suffered public scorn because of Defendants' publication of Plaintiff defamatory psychosocial history.

        23)     That Plaintiff suffered public scorn by other outpatient mental health service providers whose Jewish supervisors turned Plaintiff down for fictitious reasons, but who secretly turned Plaintiff down based on their belief that Plaintiff violated halachic/Jewish law.

        24)     That Plaintiff suffered public scorn based on Defendants' failure to allow Plaintiff to implement legal procedures established by the New York State Office of Mental Health, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and its subsidiary the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to be able to defend against Defendants' defamatory description of Plaintiff's psychosocial history.

        25)     That Plaintiff suffered public scorn based on Defendants' vague description of Plaintiff's religious crime; that Jewish supervisors of other outpatient mental health service providers were left to believe that Plaintiff “has a history of making anti-Semitic remarks” but were not told what remarks Plaintiff made there were anti-Semitic.

        26)     That Plaintiff has suffered public scorn to the point where Plaintiff is unable to be found eligible by FEGS and other continuing day treatment programs based on the Defendants' religiously-oriented defamation of Plaintiff as “anti-Semitic.”

        27)     That wholly and solely as a result of Defendants' tortious acts, Plaintiff suffered personal injuries by way of public scorn and severe mental and emotional distress for which Plaintiff was damaged in the amount of $10,000,000.00.

AS AND FOR A FOURTH SEPARATE AND DISTINCT CAUSE OF ACTION

        28)     Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 27 as if fully set forth herein.

        29)     That Defendant FEGS, Inc. by its employees Roberta Siegal, Howard Forster, M.D and Clifford Nafus knew or should have known that their conspiring with each other to render permanent Plaintiff's defamatory psychosocial history facilitated the destruction of Plaintiff's good name and the destruction of Plaintiff's ability to avail herself of the New-York-State-Constitution right to due process of law and equal protection under the law with those outpatient mental health services whose Jewish supervisors saw Defendants' defamatory psychosocial history of the Plaintiff and summarily turned down Plaintiff's request to avail herself of their services.

        30)     That Defendants' defamation of Plaintiff caused Plaintiff to be unable to exercise her right to due process of law and equal protection under the law; and that Plaintiff's inability to avail herself of her right to due process of law and equal protection under municipal, state, federal and constitutional law with other outpatient mental health care providers is itself an injury recognized by law as giving rise to an implied cause of action in the nature of Brown v. State of New York, 89 N.Y.2d 172 (1996) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

        31)     That loss of reputation based on the stigma of being publicly labeled an anti-Semitic is an injury that is recognized in law.

        32)     That the mental and emotional disstress resulting from Defendants tortious acts are recognized in the law.

        33)     That Defendants knew or should have known that Defendants' tortious conduct as described would inflict great mental and emotional distress on the Plaintiff.

        34)     That wholly and solely as a result of Defendants' tortious acts, Plaintiff suffered personal injuries by way of loss of reputation, for which Plaintiff was damaged in the amount of $10,000,000.00.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

        35)     Plaintiff respectfully prays for this honorable to present Plaintiff's action for defamation to a jury for the purpose of holding a trial.

        36)     Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court tolls the statute of limitations with regard to New York State Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 215, actions to be commenced within one year; that while Plaintiff strongly suspected that Defendants engaged in slandering the Plaintiff as anti-Semitic, Plaintiff never suspected that Plaintiff would be foolish enough to memorialize their act of defamation by engaging in libel; that Defendants purposely violated Plaintiff's right to due process of law and Plaintiff's right to equal protection under the law by failing to inform Plaintiff that they memorialized their reason for discharge of the Plaintiff as commission of the religious crime of anti-Semitism so that Plaintiff would not suspect that their reason for discharging Plaintiff was put in writing; that Plaintiff's discovery of tangible, written evidence of Defendants' act of defamation is so close to the expiration of the statute of limitation for  libel, slander, false words causing special damages that Plaintiff prays that this honorable Court tolls the statute of limitation so as to allow Plaintiff to exercise her right to due process and equal protection under the law.

        WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Cheryl D. Uzamere respectfully prays this Court for a jury trial, for this honorable Court to require Defendants to make a full public retraction of their defamatory, criminal and cruel statements, and to render judgment against the Defendants in the sum of $10,000.000.00.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York
           February __, 2011

STATE OF NEW YORK   )
COUNTY OF KINGS      ) ss:

I, Cheryl D. Uzamere, am the Plaintiff in the within Verified Complaint. I have read the foregoing complaint and know the contents thereof. The contents are true to my own knowledge except as to matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true.

Exhibit A, page 1

FEGSpsychosocialpg1.jpg

Exhibit A, page 2

FEGSpsychosocialpg2.jpg

Exhibit B, page 1

gentilesinhalachapg1.jpg

Exhibit B, page 2

gentilesinhalachapg2.jpg

Exhibit B, page 3

gentilesinhalachapg3.jpg