Appellant Files Criminal Complaint Against U.S. Criminal
Jewdiciary Racketeering-Influenced Corrupt Organization
Dirty Jew Crimes Were Facilitated by the White House's Own House Nigger Barack
"Lick the Jews Asses" Obama, who grovels to stay friends with Israel and the Jews but
allows the dirty, satanic Jews to commit crimes against disabled African American Appellant and
her children; the presidential house nigger couldn't even protect his own daughter from dirty Jew Mortimer Zuckerman, who
used one of his paparazzi slaves to take a photograph of his daughter's ass. Obama has no power over the Jews. He is the
Jews' nigger slave.
Crematorium Fodder Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Selya, Boudin, Lipez
and Stahl Should Be More Than Arrested; They Should Be Forced to Time Travel to Auschwitz and Burned
To Death; That Stupid Jew School National Institute of Judaic Law Should Also Be Burned To The Ground And Turned Into a Privy
For Ha Shem and other mangy dogs
David A. O’Neil
Assistant Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Dear Mr. O’Neil:
The Jewish U.S. Supreme Court Justices
Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan conspired with U.S. Court of Appeals/First Circuit judges Lipez, Stahl,
Boudin, Selya, to enforce the unconstitutional, Talmudic doctrine Law of the Moser and other law based on Judaic doctrine.
At this juncture they have accomplished by refusing to grant me in forma pauperis status to facilitate the Jewish judges’
ability to prevent me from reporting the crimes committed by corrupt Jewish attorneys Allen Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Jack Gladstein,
former Daily News staff writer Scott Shifrel, corrupt Daily News owner Mortimer Zuckerman, NYS Jeffrey S. Sunshine and NYS
Justice Arthur M. Schack. They have also used their religion to discriminate because I am black, and because of my status
of having a mental illness.
This is a criminal complaint against those defendants already listed in the 3rd Amended Appellate Brief below. In addition,
I also wish to filed a criminal complaint against the following individuals:
1) Professor Anker; Harvard Law School; 2) U.S. Supreme Court Justices 3) Ruth Bader Ginsberg; 4) U.S. Supreme Court Stephen
Breyer; 5) U.S. Supreme Court Elena Kagan. The following crimes were committed against my family: 18 USC §4;
fraud, 18 USC §1001; identity theft, 18 USC §1028; aggravated identity fraud, 18 USC §1028A; deprivation of
rights under color of law (including being kidnapped, unlawfully imprisoned and blacklisted), 18 USC §242/42 USC §1985;
extortion, 18 USC §872§, blackmail, 18 USC §873; violation of Title II of the Americans With Disabilities
Act; violation of the Federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973; violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI, §601;
violation of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment; violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment;
violation of the Petition Clause of the First Amendment; violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments; violation of the Notice Clause of the Sixth Amendment; violation of the Assistance of Counsel Clause of the
Sixth Amendment; violation of Plaintiff's right of privacy with regard to the illegal dissemination of her psychiatric records,
Plaintiff marriage history, Plaintiff married name, and the non-content information associated with Plaintiff's internet
and telephone accounts; violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, intentional misuse of national
security letters (NSLs) and violation of the Hobbs Act. Furthermore, Plaintiff's also seeks to expose that Defendant
U.S. Department of Homeland Security has had knowledge of the correct identity, and has been in possession of the identification
documents for Defendant Ehigie Edobor Uzamere for well over thirty (30) years. Defendant the United States of America, along
with the rest of the Defendants, owed Plaintiff and her children the duty to use the aforementioned documentation regarding
Defendant Ehigie Edobor Uzamere's identity to protect Plaintiff and her children from being victims of fraud, immigration
fraud, aggravated identity theft and victims of Plaintiff's inability to obtain spousal and children support based on Plaintiff
and her daughter having the legal right to bear Defendant Ehigie Edobor Uzamere's correct name. However, rather than comply
with the law, the Defendants, in particular, the Jewish Defendants, engaged in a course of conduct that violated Plaintiff
rights and the rights of her daughter, Tara, for the sole purpose of preventing Plaintiff from filing complaints against
hateful, racist, dishonest, Jewish immigration attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro and Jack Gladstein. Defendants' criminal
conduct deprived them then, and continues to deprive Plaintiff and her family of the right to bear Defendant Ehigie Edobor
Uzamere correct African name, and continues to condemn Plaintiff and her family to the same deprivation of the knowledge
of African bloodline indicators that racist Jews and racist white Christians forced upon Plaintiff's African ancestors.
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Nigeria's newspaper The Nation refers to Senator Uzamere as "Sen. Ehigie Uzamere" and "Godwin Ehigie
Uzamere." The Nigerian government refers to Sen. Uzamere as "Ehigie Edobor Uzamere." The letter from USCIS
dated June 12, 2009 included letters containing immigration numbers A35 201 224, "Ehigie Edobor Uzamere" and A24
027 764 "Godwin Ehigie Uzamere."
NYS Justice Sunshine referred to Appellant's ex-husband as Ehigie Edobor Uzamere in his decision: "Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss this action upon the grounds that he is not the husband of the plaintiff
is denied in its entirety. The defendant is the husband in conformity with the parties marriage on November 21, 1979."
NYS Justice D'Emic said in his decision: "The parties were married in New York State on
November 21, 1979, and the child of the marriage was born on July 7, 1980."
Supreme Court Appellate judges Fisher, Angiolillo, Lott and Sgroi stated in their decision: In an action for a divorce and
ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings
County (Sunshine, J.) dated January 12, 2009, which, inter alia, denied her motion, among other things, for leave
to enter a default judgment against the defendant and for an award of child support, and directed a hearing on the issues
of whether the parties were in fact married. The caption of the action Cheryl D. Uzamere v. Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, reflecting
that Appellant was married to Ehigie Edobor Uzamere.
Why the hell would satanic jewdiciary bitches Ruth
Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, Judge Selya, Judge Lipez, Judge Boudin and Judge Stahl insist on rescuing dirty
Jews Allen Kaye, Harvey Shapiro, Jack Gladstein, NYS Justice Sunshine, NYS Justice Schack, Scott Shifrel and Mortimer Zuckerman?
Why do these Jew demons continue to push Law of the Moser on me and my children?
Home » Politics » Why we must renegotiate the
basis of our corporate existence – Sen. Ehigie Uzamere
we must renegotiate the basis of our corporate existence –Sen. Ehigie Uzamere
Godwin Ehigie Uzamere is a senator of the Federal Republic.
He is a two-time senator representing Edo South Senatorial Zone. Uzamere was first elected senator on the platform of the
Peoples Democratic Party PDP in 2007 but in 2011, he was later reelected on the ticket of Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN).
Uzamere who is the Senate Committee Chairman on Foreign and Local Debts, in this interview with Assistant Editor, LINUS OBOGO,
spoke on Nigeria’s spiraling debt profile, barely six years after it met her debt obligations to the Paris and London
Clubs. He also spoke on the need for a national dialogue in the light of the raging insurgency in the North , Edo politics
and sundry issues Excerpts:
Want proof that this article was written by a Nigerian? Check the following website:
Don't believe me? Then why not check the Nigerian
JEWISH DOCTRINES LAWBREAKING JEWISH DEFENDANTS USED TO RATIONALIZE THEIR COMMISSION OF MISPRISION OF FELONY
[Jews] Are Called Man”
– The Comparison of Gentiles to Animals
In Torat Cohanim on the portion of Kedoshim, chapter 4, halacha
12: "You shall not avenge nor bear a grudge against the children of your people -- but you can avenge and bear a grudge
against others" (that is, against Gentiles -- explanation of the Ra'avad).
In 1992 a book
was published by a leading member of the Satmar community entitled Artzot Ha-Hayyim. On p. 52 he explains, and quotes other
rabbis, that the reason Abraham Lincoln was killed was because he freed the blacks. this is also the reason why Kennedy
was killed, i.e. because he was good to the blacks. He continues by saying that this will be the fate of any who adopt a
progressive attitude towards blacks, because they are meant to be enslaved.
The Noahide Laws promise deadly consequences for Christians. We shall
understand why a little later. Furthermore, LORD God tasked Jews to enforce the seven Noahide Commandments,
and to enforce them with liberal use of the death penalty.
See above left
In contrast, Talmud law insists on unequal
justice under law. Talmudic law hold there is one law for Jews, and one for Gentiles. It is not inconsistent
with the Old Testament, in which LORD God decrees that Jews should not enslave other Jews: Gentiles are the proper slaves
See above left
Gentiles Easy to Convict: Under Jewish law, Gentiles are
easy to convict for capital crimes; but it is difficult to convict Jews. The standards of
proof are different.
Therefore he put the curse upon the last-born of the son that had prevented him from begetting
a younger son than the three he had. The descendants of Ham through Canaan therefore have red eyes. . .they have misshapen
lips. . .they have twisted curly hair. . .Thus he was requited, for it is the way of God to mete out punishment measure for
U.S. Supreme Court Warms to the Talmud:
Approximately three after Nathan and Alyza filed the Bryan v. Moore amicus curiae brief -- another notable even took place.
A kosher dinner was held to honor the establishment of the National Institute for Judaic Law (NIJL). The dinner was
attended by 200 people, including Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer and Antonin Scalia.