THE CRIMES OF SENATOR EHIGIE EDOBOR A.K.A. "GODWIN" UZAMERE
1. Home2. Once Upon A Time3. Victim's Statement4. My Search for Justice5. Descent into Hell6. U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere7. Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere8. Ignored by Federal Agencies9. Ignored by Nigerian Authorities10. Victims' Loss of Child Support11. The Uzamere Family12. Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere13. John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community14. Hall of Shame15. 1st Judicial Blow By African-American Judge Thomas16. Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye17. Too Many Discrepancies...18. Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions19. Will Sampson Staff Refuse To Help Identity Fraud Victims?20. Law Office of Gladstein & Messinger21. Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide22. Consulate General of Nigeria23. Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu24. Proof of Legal Marriage25. Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud26. Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail27. The Proof...28. Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!29. Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?30. Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere31. Judge Prus -- What Gives?32. Back on Track!33. Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law34. Petitioner's Verified Petition35. Supplemental Verified Petition36. Judge Prus Recuses Himself37. Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice38. Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar39. Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo40. My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin41. Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed42. Open Letters to the FBI43. Open Letter to All U.S. Judges44. Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene45. Tara's Affidavit46. $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries47. Will Fiduciaries Settle?48. New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze49. There Is No Cousin Godwin!50. Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State51. Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye52. Can International Agency Help?53. Chief Judge Wood's Court54. Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?55. Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis56. No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!57. Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?58. Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?59. Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!60. Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!61. Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses62. Appellate Brief pages 24 to end63. No Justice -- No Peace!64. Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel65. Are You A Victim of A Green Card Marriage Scam?66. End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship67. How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney68. Is The End Finally in Sight?69. Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?70. What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?71. How Will NYSDDC Respond?72. Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence73. Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise To The Challenge?74. Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits75. Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption76. Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored By Appellate Division's White Judiciary77. More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY78. Senator Uzamere...You Are The Husband!79. Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look On Idly?80. What will SCOTUS Do?81. Why did they disobey?82. Cabranes' Fraud Upon The Court83. Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?84. New York State Lawsuit for Fraud85. Judge Sunshine Is A Loser86. Judge Sunshine Out of Options87. Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing...88. Petition for Rehearing89. Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah90. Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel91. Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid92. Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk93. Judge Scuccimarra Ruling94. Defendants Have Defaulted95. Will Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel Because Defendants Are Rich Jews?96. New York and Anne B. Carroll97. Lawsuit Against President98. Will Obama Listen?99. Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra100. More Court Shenanigans?101. Howard U. Schmokescreen102. Into the fire...103. What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?104. Housing Court Corruption105. Mayor Bloomberg's Finest106. FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy107. FEGS Gave Victim No Choice108. What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?109. What Will Court of Claims Do?110. Abuse of Religion Not New111. How Wicked Are They?112. What Lies???113. Federal Lawsuit114. Disastrous Results to Appeal115. Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision116. Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans117. FOIA Hiding Evidence118. Congressional Testimony119. Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem120. Uzamere v. USA, et al121. Judicial Whores Willy and Patty122. Uzamere v. USA123. Find an Unbiased Court124. U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens125. Appellate Brief First Circuit126. U.S. Government Hides Prosecution127. A Jewish RICO128. Jews' Demonic Doctrine -- Law of the Moser129. Mishkin Yanks His Own Nuts130. Will African American Victim of Grand Laceny Receive Justice?131. Judicial Ethics Hypocrite132. Jew Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge133. Please save my family!134. Psychopaths135. Jewish Paradigm Put Jews on Top136. Pretender Bharara137. Int'l Complaint Against Israel, United States and Nigeria138. Memorial of Impeachment139. Supplemental Complaint140. Appellate Brief to UN and US141. U.S. Supreme Court Petition -- UN and U.S.142. A Real Man

Will Another U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judge Employ
More Talmudic Shenanigans?
Or will its judiciary, in a show of support, plead "I'm biased!" and blacklist helpless plaintiff?
 2009CourtPhoto-CJHewitt.JPG

 
Cheryl D. Uzamere
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (718) 647-1708
Fax: (347) 227-0118

          FAX

To:

Office Number

Fax Number

Hon. Barack H. Obama, President, USA
Hon. Eric H. Holder, Att'y General, USDOJ
Tony West, Asst. Att'y General, USDOJ
Inspector General, U.S. Postal Service
Hazel C. Keahey, USCFC
1-202-456-1414
1-202-514-4507
1-202-514-3495
1-888-877-7644
1-202-357-6400
1-202-456-2461
1-202-514-4507
1-202-616-8470
1-866-756-6741
1-202-357-6401

Subject:

Please ensure that my legal documents don't get “lost in the mail”

Date:

August 25, 2010

To Whom It May Concern:

In keeping with habit, I have taken the liberty of uploading this correspondence to the internet. I believe as does Mr. Obama, that there should be transparency in government, especially where the judicial system is concerned. You can review my web page containing this information at http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.net/more_court_shenanigans.html.

I am a victim of the Honorable Christine O.C. Miller's refusal to recuse herself from my prior lawsuit pursuant to 28 USC §455. My prior lawsuit addresses the encroachment of the Talmud-oriented Law of the Moser (see attached), a religious doctrine that requires its adherents not to report each other's crimes to non-Jews. I believe that Judge Miller is Jewish. I also believe that Judge Miller, also known as Christine Cook Nettesheim, violated the law by trying to adjudicate my lawsuit. If it were not for U.S. Court of Federal Claim's Rule 41, Judge Nettesheim/Miller would still be trying to adjudicate my claim. After this, I may have to face an entire court boycotting me, but I digress...

It is not your responsibility to deal with such problems. Your only problem is the mail, and right now, so is mine. In the past, when I tried to use the USPS' certified priority mail, returned receipt requested, my mail mysteriously vanished. I made a point to attach the first page of my lawsuit against the USPS to show that I had this problem in the past.

Can you please see to it that my mail does not get “lost” this time? I know that because I am a schvartze/worthless nigger that Judge Miller does not give a damn about violating my rights.  I am sure that her violating my rights means nothing to the judiciary of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims – especially its Ashkenazi judiciary. However, I think the USPS may treat me a little better.  My father, Harry Lee Duncan, Korean Conflict veteran, deceased, interred at Calverton National Cemetery – and yes, a former letter carrier for the USPS, earned a decent living and assisted my mother in caring for ten (10) children, so I don't see the USPS as all bad.

Please have some pity for this worthless nigger and make sure my mail does not get lost.

Thank you for reading my fax.

mysignature2.jpg 

Cheryl D. Uzamere

In The United States Court of Federal Claims

 

 

_________________________________
Cheryl D. Uzamere

                              Plaintiff,                             No.:______________

         -against-                                                 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

United States of America

                              Defendant.

_________________________________

COMPLAINT

        1) At all times hereinafter mentioned, Plaintiff was and still is a resident of the City of Brooklyn, County of Kings and State of New York.

JURISDICTION

        2) This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 USC §1491, which says that “The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim against the United States founded...upon the Constitution...”

        3) This Court has jurisdiction over this action as it is an implied cause of action in the manner of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

PARTIES

        4) Defendant is the United States.

ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO DEFENDANT

        5) Plaintiff alleges that in the past, lawsuits that Plaintiff attempted to mail were mishandled by employees of the United States Postal Service in a manner that rendered the packages untraceable (see Exhibit A); so that in order to protect herself, Plaintiff has mailed a copy of her lawsuit to the Honorable Barack H. Obama and the Honorable Eric H. Holder via certified mail, return receipt requested (see Exhibit B).

        6) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant the United States, by and through employee Hazel C. Keahey, Clerk of Court for the United States Court of Federal Claims, interfered with or assisted in interfering with the random judiciary selection process so that the Honorable Christine O. C. Miller or a judge who is a member of the Ashkenazim would be the only judges selected to adjudicate Plaintiff's lawsuit, number 10-555C.

        7) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant the United States, by and through its employee the Honorable Christine O. C. Miller, refused to self-disqualify from adjudicating Plaintiff's lawsuit pursuant to 28 USC §455, although Plaintiff's lawsuit concerns the encroachment of the Talmudic doctrine Law of the Moser into judicial affairs, and although Judge Miller is Jewish; that had Plaintiff not sent her notice of voluntary dismissal by priority mail and overnight mail (see Exhibit C), Judge Miller would have attempted to adjudicate Plaintiff's lawsuit in a manner to ensure that Plaintiff's lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice (see Exhibit D).

        8) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant the United States, by and through Hazel C. Keahey violated Plaintiff's First Amendment right to petition the government for a redress of grievance by refusing to accept a faxed copy of her notice for voluntary dismissal, even though Plaintiff informed Hazel C. Keahey of Plaintiff's intent to mail the notice to voluntarily dismiss her lawsuit.

        9) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant the United States, by and through the Honorable Christine O.C. Miller attempted to violate Plaintiff's First Amendment right with reference to Plaintiff's right to be free from the establishment of a state religion by attempting to adjudicate Plaintiff's lawsuit by invoking the Talmudic doctrine Law of the Moser to prevent Plaintiff's lawsuit from being heard fairly and impartially.

        10) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant the United States, by and through the Honorable Christine O. C. Miller violated the Fourteenth Amendment with regard to Plaintiff's right to equal protection under the law by attempting to adjudicating Plaintiff's lawsuit for the sole purpose of rendering a decision in favor of defendants who are Ashkenazi Jewish, and in favor of members of the Ashkenazim to whom Plaintiff's lawsuit makes reference.

        11) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's judicial system has become a dictatorship that allows members of the Ashkenazim to violate the U.S. Constitution and the constitutional rights of non-Ashkenazim with impunity; that the aforesaid individuals' violations are based on their enforcement of the Ashkenazim's Talmudic doctrine Law of the Moser, a Jewish religious doctrine that prohibits Ashkenazim from reporting the wrongdoings of Ashkenazim to secular authorities.

        12) Plaintiff alleges that the United States Department of Justice's job, as it pertains to Ashkenazi judges, is not to prosecute Ashkenazi judges who violate the U.S. Constitution, but to prosecute individuals who challenge Ashkenazi judges' unconstitutional acts; and that whether the aforesaid acts are based on the recalcitrant refusal of Defendant's Ashkenazi judiciary to obey the law, or based in Defendant's non-Ashkenazi judiciary's inability to enforce the law, American citizens who are victimized by members of the Ashkenazim are no longer safe because they will no longer be treated as equal to the Ashkenazim by Defendant's Ashkenazi judiciary.

        13) Plaintiff asserts that Plaintiff's lawsuit 10-555C concerns judicial acts of fraud upon the court resulting from Ashkenazi judges' enforcement of the Talmudic religious doctrine the Law of the Moser in judicial settings (see  E, pages 63-65).

        14) Plaintiff asserts that the current lawsuit addresses the recent acts of Talmud-oriented fraud upon the court committed by Hazel C. Keahey, Clerk of Court for the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the Honorable Christine O.C. Miller, judge of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims during Judge Miller's failed attempt to adjudicate Plaintiff's lawsuit, number 10-555C.

        15) Plaintiff alleges that the United States, by and through Defendants Hazel C. Keahey and the Honorable Christine O.C. Miller committed the following: 1) violation of 28 USC §455, disqualification of judges; 2) violation of Plaintiff's First Amendment right to freedom of speech; 3) violation of Plaintiff's First Amendment right to be free from the establishment of a government-sponsored religion; 4) violation of Plaintiff's Fifth Amendment right to due process of law; and, 5) violation of Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection under the law.

        16) That Plaintiff alleges that Defendant the United States, by and through Defendant Hazel C. Keahey will continue to violate Plaintiff's rights by following the instructions of the Honorable Christine O.C without question; that Judge Miller will render a biased decision against Plaintiff insofar as the Judge Miller, who is Ashkenazi, will adhere to the Talmudic imperative not to report of the crimes of fellow Jews to non-Jewish secular authorities; that Plaintiff will lose this lawsuit and appeal it; and that when Plaintiff appeals it, the only judges who will have control (e.g. whose opinions will count) are the following judges: the Honorable Judge Daniel M. Friedman; the Honorable Judge Pauline Newman; the Honorable Haldane Robert Mayer; the Honorable Judge S. Jay Plager and the Honorable Alvin A. Schall – all of whom Plaintiff alleges are Jewish – and will follow Judge Miller's lead and render a decision that is biased in favor of the Talmudic imperative not to directly or indirectly report the crimes of fellow Ashkenazim to secular authorities.

BACKGROUND FACTS

        17) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant, the United States, by and through employees Hazel C. Keahey and the Honorable Christine O.C. Miller violated Plaintiff's constitutional rights, to wit:

        18) Plaintiff asserts that on or around August 16, 2010, Plaintiff contacted the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to see if her lawsuit was received.

        19) Plaintiff asserts that Hazel C. Keahey told Plaintiff that her lawsuit was received and was assigned to the Honorable Christine O.C. Miller.

        20) Plaintiff asserts that Plaintiff panicked based on her belief that Judge Miller is a member of the Ashkenazim; and that based on the aforesaid belief, informed Ms. Keahey that she wished to withdraw her lawsuit.

        21) That Plaintiff asserts that she explained to Ms. Keahey that her lawsuit concerned the encroachment of the Talmud in judicial settings, and that Judge Miller was violating 28 USC §455 because she refused to disqualify herself.

        22) That Plaintiff contacted the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Division to ascertain whether Plaintiff's lawsuit was received.

COUNT I – AS AN FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

DEFENDANT OWED PLAINTIFF THE DUTY TO SELF-DISQUALIFY

        ) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant owed Plaintiff the duty to

        ) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant failed to perform the duty to

        ) Plaintiff asserts that as a result of Defendant's failure to perform the aforesaid duty, Plaintiff suffered____________

        ) Plaintiff asserts that as the victim of the deprivation of Plaintiff's _______ Amendment right, Plaintiff can sue for the violation of the Amendment itself; and that the existence of a remedy for the violation is implied because of the the importance of the right violated.

COUNT II – AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

DEFENDANT OWED PLAINTIFF THE DUTY TO PROTECT HER RIGHT
TO EXERCISE FREE SPEECH

        ) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant owed Plaintiff the duty to

        ) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant failed to perform the duty to

        ) Plaintiff asserts that as a result of Defendant's failure to perform the aforesaid duty, Plaintiff suffered____________

        ) Plaintiff asserts that as the victim of the deprivation of Plaintiff's _______ Amendment right, Plaintiff can sue for the violation of the Amendment itself; and that the existence of a remedy for the violation is implied because of the the importance of the right violated.

COUNT III – AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

DEFENDANT OWED PLAINTIFF THE DUTY TO PROTECT HER RIGHT TO FREEDOM FROM
A GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED RELIGION

        ) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant owed Plaintiff the duty to

        ) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant failed to perform the duty to

        ) Plaintiff asserts that as a result of Defendant's failure to perform the aforesaid duty, Plaintiff suffered____________

        ) Plaintiff asserts that as the victim of the deprivation of Plaintiff's _______ Amendment right, Plaintiff can sue for the violation of the Amendment itself; and that the existence of a remedy for the violation is implied because of the the importance of the right violated.

COUNT IV – AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

DEFENDANT OWED PLAINTIFF THE DUTY TO ENFORCE PLAINTIFF'S RIGHT
TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW

        ) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant owed Plaintiff the duty to

        ) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant failed to perform the duty to

        ) Plaintiff asserts that as a result of Defendant's failure to perform the aforesaid duty, Plaintiff suffered____________

        ) Plaintiff asserts that as the victim of the deprivation of Plaintiff's _______ Amendment right, Plaintiff can sue for the violation of the Amendment itself; and that the existence of a remedy for the violation is implied because of the the importance of the right violated.

COUNT IV – AS AND FOR A FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

DEFENDANT OWED PLAINTIFF THE DUTY TO ENFORCE PLAINTIFF'S RIGHT
TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW

        ) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant owed Plaintiff the duty to

        ) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant failed to perform the duty to

        ) Plaintiff asserts that as a result of Defendant's failure to perform the aforesaid duty, Plaintiff suffered____________

        ) Plaintiff asserts that as the victim of the deprivation of Plaintiff's _______ Amendment right, Plaintiff can sue for the violation of the Amendment itself; and that the existence of a remedy for the violation is implied because of the the importance of the right violated.

        WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Cheryl D. Uzamere respectfully prays that this Court grants a jury trial, and for this Court to render judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $10,000,000.00 for the first, second, third, fourth and fifth causes of action herein, together with the costs and disbursement of this action, and for such other, further, and additional relief as to this Court may seem just and proper.

 mysignature2.jpg

Cheryl D. Uzamere

09-3709.jpg
prioritymailtoobama.jpg
prioritymailtoholder.jpg
informingonjews_2.jpg
stoolietodaddypage1.jpg
deathinforeharryduncan.jpg