1. Home2. Once Upon A Time3. Victim's Statement4. My Search for Justice5. Descent into Hell6. U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere7. Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere8. Ignored by Federal Agencies9. Ignored by Nigerian Authorities10. Victims' Loss of Child Support11. The Uzamere Family12. Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere13. John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community14. Hall of Shame15. 1st Judicial Blow By African-American Judge Thomas16. Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye17. Too Many Discrepancies...18. Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions19. Will Sampson Staff Refuse To Help Identity Fraud Victims?20. Law Office of Gladstein & Messinger21. Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide22. Consulate General of Nigeria23. Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu24. Proof of Legal Marriage25. Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud26. Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail27. The Proof...28. Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!29. Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?30. Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere31. Judge Prus -- What Gives?32. Back on Track!33. Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law34. Petitioner's Verified Petition35. Supplemental Verified Petition36. Judge Prus Recuses Himself37. Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice38. Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar39. Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo40. My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin41. Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed42. Open Letters to the FBI43. Open Letter to All U.S. Judges44. Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene45. Tara's Affidavit46. $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries47. Will Fiduciaries Settle?48. New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze49. There Is No Cousin Godwin!50. Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State51. Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye52. Can International Agency Help?53. Chief Judge Wood's Court54. Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?55. Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis56. No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!57. Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?58. Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?59. Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!60. Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!61. Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses62. Appellate Brief pages 24 to end63. No Justice -- No Peace!64. Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel65. Are You A Victim of A Green Card Marriage Scam?66. End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship67. How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney68. Is The End Finally in Sight?69. Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?70. What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?71. How Will NYSDDC Respond?72. Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence73. Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise To The Challenge?74. Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits75. Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption76. Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored By Appellate Division's White Judiciary77. More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY78. Senator Uzamere...You Are The Husband!79. Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look On Idly?80. What will SCOTUS Do?81. Why did they disobey?82. Cabranes' Fraud Upon The Court83. Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?84. New York State Lawsuit for Fraud85. Judge Sunshine Is A Loser86. Judge Sunshine Out of Options87. Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing...88. Petition for Rehearing89. Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah90. Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel91. Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid92. Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk93. Judge Scuccimarra Ruling94. Defendants Have Defaulted95. Will Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel Because Defendants Are Rich Jews?96. New York and Anne B. Carroll97. Lawsuit Against President98. Will Obama Listen?99. Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra100. More Court Shenanigans?101. Howard U. Schmokescreen102. Into the fire...103. What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?104. Housing Court Corruption105. Mayor Bloomberg's Finest106. FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy107. FEGS Gave Victim No Choice108. What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?109. What Will Court of Claims Do?110. Abuse of Religion Not New111. How Wicked Are They?112. What Lies???113. Federal Lawsuit114. Disastrous Results to Appeal115. Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision116. Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans117. FOIA Hiding Evidence118. Congressional Testimony119. Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem120. Uzamere v. USA, et al121. Judicial Whores Willy and Patty122. Uzamere v. USA123. Find an Unbiased Court124. U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens125. Appellate Brief First Circuit126. U.S. Government Hides Prosecution127. A Jewish RICO128. Jews' Demonic Doctrine -- Law of the Moser129. Mishkin Yanks His Own Nuts130. Will African American Victim of Grand Laceny Receive Justice?131. Judicial Ethics Hypocrite132. Jew Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge133. Please save my family!134. Psychopaths135. Jewish Paradigm Put Jews on Top136. Pretender Bharara137. Int'l Complaint Against Israel, United States and Nigeria138. Memorial of Impeachment139. Supplemental Complaint140. Appellate Brief to UN and US141. U.S. Supreme Court Petition -- UN and U.S.142. A Real Man

Mort Zuckerman's Tabloid Publicly Scorns Identity Fraud Victim For Having A Mental Illness
While Attorney Anne B. Carroll Suborns Perjury of Non-Answering Defendants,
Continuing Facilitation of Immigration and Identity Fraud

COUNTY OF NASSAU                                               X
Cheryl D. Uzamere
X                                                                                       Index No. 10-009998
                                    Plaintiff,                                         AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION 
        - against -                                                                   TO DEFENDANTS' DEMAND
Daily News, LP and Scott Shifrel
                                    Defendants.                           X
COUNTY OF NASSAU    )     ss:

        I, Cheryl D. Uzamere, being duly sworn, depose and say that:

        1)     I am the Plaintiff in the above entitled action.

        2)     I make this Affidavit in opposition to Defendant's demand to change the venue of Plaintiff's action.

        3)    That Plaintiff asserts that Defendants were properly served (Exhibit A pages 1 to 7).

        4)    That Plaintiff asserts that Defendant Daily News, LP signed for receipt of Plaintiff's legal documents on June 7, 2010 (see Exhibit A6).

        5)     That Plaintiff asserts that Plaintiff's legal papers were delivered to Defendant Scott Shifrel's place of business (see Exhibit A5).

        6)     That Plaintiff asserts that Defendant Scott Shifrel refused to sign for receipt of Plaintiff's Verified Complaint and Notice to Admit.

        7)     That Defendant Scott Shifrel made no attempt to inform Plaintiff of Defendant Scott Shifrel's refusal to sign Plaintiff's legal papers.

        8)     That Plaintiff asserts that U.S. Postal Service claims that it has no record of Defendant Scott Shifrel's signed return receipt card.

        9)     That in spite of Plaintiff's due diligence with regard to Plaintiff's attempt to effect service of process upon Defendant Scott Shifrel, the aforesaid Defendant illegally evaded receipt of Plaintiff's Verified Complaint and Notice to Admit.

       10)     That Plaintiff filed a federal lawsuit in the nature of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) against the U.S. Postal Service and Defendant Scott Shifrel based on Defendants' commission of 18 USC §1341, 18 USC §1346, 18 USC 18 §241, 18 USC §242, and violation of Plaintiff's constitutional rights (see Exhibit B).

       11)     That within days of Plaintiff's realization of Defendants' refusal to interpose an answer to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint and a response to Plaintiff's Notice to Admit, and within days of Defendant Scott Shifrel's refusal to accept service of process in a manner that assigns blame to the U.S. Postal Service, Plaintiff received a demand for change of venue by Defendants' attorney.

       12)     That Defendants failed to interpose an answer to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint.

       13)     That Defendants failed to interpose a response to Plaintiff's Notice to Admit.

       14)     That Defendants failed to provide Plaintiff with a logical reason why they have not interposed an answer or a response.

       15)     That Defendants' attorney refused to acknowledge receipt of the legal papers that were sent to Defendant Scott Shifrel, even though proof of Defendant Scott Shifrel's receipt of Plaintiff's legal documents is irrefutable.

       16)     That in addition to Defendants' and their attorney's blatant schemes to defraud Plaintiff of her constitutional right to due process and equal protection under the law, Defendants now ask this Court to believe that Defendants' desire to transfer Plaintiff's lawsuit to the court in New York County is an honest desire based solely on CPLR 511 (a) and (b).



       17)     That Plaintiff asserts that Defendants' demand is unreasonable, based, not only on the length of time already expended by Defendants, but primarily on Defendants' dishonest use of time to avoid getting caught for their various acts of fraud.

       18)     That Plaintiff asserts that Defendants' use of time is solely to implement various artifices to defraud both the court and the Plaintiff.

       19)     That Plaintiff asserts that Defendants' dishonesty stems from an act of facilitation of immigration fraud and identity committed by attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro and Bernard Rostanski whose crimes Defendants used the newspaper to try to hide so that Plaintiff is unable to obtain justice (Exhibits C to Exhibit E page 4).

       20)     That Defendants' demand to the honorable Court is essentially “Your Honor, can I please go to a court where it is easier for me to cheat?”

       21)     That Plaintiff asserts that any request for additional time on behalf of Defendants' is precluded by the doctrine of “unclean hands: "those seeking equity must do equity" or "equity must come with clean hands”; and that Defendants' hands are not clean.



       22)     Plaintiff asserts that Defendants' paper, the New York Daily News is widely read in all five boroughs including New York County.

       23)     Plaintiff asserts that the Supreme Courts in all five boroughs, including New York County Supreme Court have justices who are Jewish.

       24)     That this honorable Court should see that based on Defendants' refusal to interpose an answer and response to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint and Plaintiff's Notice to Admit, that the only reason for their request to go to the New York County Supreme Court is because Defendants' attorney and an as yet unknown justice have fixed this case to circumvent Plaintiff's right to due process by ensuring that the Defendants do not interpose an answer or response.

       25)     That for this court to accede to Defendants' request would be an act of fraud upon the court, for which Plaintiff would quickly file a federal action in the nature of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents.

       26)     That Plaintiff recently filed such an action that includes Scott Shifrel as a defendant.

       27)     That Plaintiff asserts that for the aforesaid reasons, Defendants' demand to be go to the New York Supreme Court should be rejected.

        WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that this Court reject Defendants' demand in its entirety and allows Plaintiff to proceed in this honorable Court.


Cheryl D. Uzamere