|
THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s
DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL SADISM
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual
Sadism Disorder Diagnostic
Criteria 302.84 (F65.52)
Over
a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the
physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by
fantasies, urges, or behaviors.
The
individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or
the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or
impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
Diagnostic Features
The
diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to individuals
who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those who deny
any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another
individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
.
. .Examples of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or
psychological suffering of another individual include individuals known to
have inflicted pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions
but who deny any urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may
further claim that known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional
or nonsexual. Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the
infliction of pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not
report any significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or
psychological suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny
having urges or fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it
follows that they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially
impaired by such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual
sadism disorder despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior
constitutes clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual sadism
(by satisfying Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their
paraphilically motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress,
harm, or risk of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B).
"Recurrent"
sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on
a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more
victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying
this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and
suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a
strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple
victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient
but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if
the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.
  
What the Babylonian Talmud says about the
worship of Molech: Mishnah. He
who gives of his seed to Molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers it to
Molech and causes it to pass through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the reverse, he incurs no
penalty, unless he does both.
Gemara.
The Mishnah teaches idolatry and giving to Molech. R(abbi) Abin said:
Our Mishnah is in accordance with the view that Molech worship is not
idolatry.
Informing
on Fellow Jews who Commit Crimes:
Mesira
in Modern Times
(Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Abodah
Zarah, Folio 26b)
Rabbi Michael J. Broyde*
The S. Daniel Abraham &
Ira L. Rennert Torah Ethics Project
The Orthodox Caucus
Toronto, Canada
Netivot HaTorah Day School
October 19, 2001, at 8:00 p.m.
Even
though Jewish law expects people to observe the laws of the land, and even
imposes that obligation as a religious duty, the Talmud recounts - in a
number of places - that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular
government, even when their conduct is a violation of secular law and even
when their conduct is a violation of Jewish law...Even is secular government...incorporate(s)
substantive Jewish law into secular law and punish violations of what is, in
effect, Jewish law, Jews would still be prohibited from cooperating with such
a system. Indeed, classical Jewish law treats a person who frequently informs
on others as a pursuer (a
rodef) who may be killed to prevent him from informing,
even without a formal court ruling.

The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976
audiobook murdered 30 days after this interview (click on video to hear
Youtube interview). In this video, Mr. Rosenthal talked about the Ashkenazi
Jewish plan to take over the United States and the world.





The Lost
Item of a Gentile: “If his intention is that he, and not
the faith or Israel, should be praised, or because he loves the Gentile and
has mercy on him, it is forbidden [to return the Gentile’s lost item]”)
Rabbis Say It’s OK to Kill Goyim:
This is not science fiction people. This is not said by some anti-Semitic KKK
or Neo-Nazis these are Rabbis saying it’s OK to kill non-Jews including
children. I have found most of the most damning information about Jewish
crimes comes from Jewish sources not so called anti-Semitic.


http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
Conspiracy of Silence – Banned Documentary: (click on any
photo to see Youtube video)

Conspiracy
of Silence is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a U.S. child sex
abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government.
Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a highly decorated Vietnam war
veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator, Conspiracy of Silence reveals how
rogue elements at all levels of government have been involved in systematic
child sex abuse and pedophilia to feed the base desires of key politicians.
Paul Bonacci: The Murder [1985 --
GRAPHIC! click on photos below to see Youtube video)

Paul Bonacci was one of many children who were taken from
Nebraska’s Boys Town foster care/adoption network, brought to the White House
and savagely raped. In this video, Mr. Bonacci describes being taken from the
White House with Nicholas and an unnamed boy. Paul and Nicholas were forced
to rape the boy at gunpoint by the person who filmed the event. Later the
unnamed child was sodomized by the person making the video until his anus
bled, kicked repeatedly in the head and then shot to death – all after being
raped in the White House by Ashkenazi/Jewish and non-Ashkenazi/Jewish
politicians and corporate leaders. Also see https://youtu.be/8b61iIQCapY.

Larry King: Overachiever
Editor’s
Note: Donald Gregg, National Security Advisor to George H.W. Bush was
tasked with silencing those involved. He turned to the CIA.
The Franklin Scandal was only one aspect of a much larger “call boy”
operation moving children and teenagers, picked up from Boys
Town, Catholic orphanages and off the streets, and housed in Washington
and New York primarily.

















http://come-and-hear.com/editor/br_3.html




Click
on the two photos above to see video.






Israel’s
first female pimp, Angelique Sabag Gautiller, Israel's first female pimp
and one of many whore houses in Tel Aviv, Israel that Israeli pimps use to
force beautiful, delicate White ladies from Russia and Slavic countries who
have been tricked and lured with promises of respectable jobs in Israel and
then forced to part with their virginity and gang raped every night by
sexually perverted Israeli and Arab men.









·
How 11 New York City Babies Contracted Herpes Through - Health;
·
Baby Dies of Herpes Virus in Ritual Circumcision in NYC Orthodox ...;
·
Herpes cases among babies linked to ultra-Orthodox Jewish;
·
NYC, Orthodox Jews in talks over ritual after herpes cases - USA Today;
·
11 Babies Infected with Herpes in New York - Sandra Rose;
·
CDC: 11 infants contracted herpes due to controversial Jewish ...;
·
New York Baby Infected with Herpes After Metzitza B'peh;
·
New case of neonatal herpes caused by Jewish ... - New York Post;
·
Orthodox Rabbis Fight NYC's Effort to Warn Parents About Herpes ...







Jewish Wisdom: What is a Goy?
Talmudic Jews
'Non-Jews Goyim Are Beasts to
Serve
Us as Slaves'
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293:
"AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN (Breishit 9:25):
(Commentary omitted) ...R. Huna also said in R. Joseph's name: You [i.e. Noah
is speaking to Ham) have prevented me from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned.
R. Chiyya said: Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark, therefore Ham came
forth black-skinned while the dog publicly exposed its copulation.

N.Y. State Lawmaker Apologizes
for Blackface Costume
By Sonia Kennebeck, CNN
Tue February 26, 2013
Story Highlights
Brooklyn
Democrat Dov Hikind dressed in blackface for a Purim party.
He
apologized to "anyone who was offended" but added, "that was
not the intention."
One of his Assembly colleagues calls the apology "a
beginning" but inadequate.

Yair Netanyahu’s Night of Debauchery Revealed in Bombshell
Recordings: Younger
Netanyahu heard asking his friend, a gas tycoon's son, for NIS 400 for
strippers, saying he owed him for $20 billion deal advanced by PM (click on
photo to hear Yair audiotape)

“Rachel” (Vicki Polin) on Oprah Winfrey Show Discussing
“Rachel’s” Ashkenazi Jewish Parents Introducing Her to Ashkenazi Jewish
Ritual Murder and Rape of Children (click on photo to see Youtube video).


The
Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of the
victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for
Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is
demonic torture, sex and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as
sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including
non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping
members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping and killing. Like
the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved
force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race,
financial issues and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all
junkies use excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political,
religious, social or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless
they are stopped, they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite
for torture, deviant sex and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left
unchecked, will be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff
addicts. Nothing more – nothing less.
![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_105_more_court_shenanigans_files/image371.png)
Ashkenazi
sexual sadist achieving climax by using a whip to rape a helpless human being
to death.



https://youtu.be/Mg_13WJ4gDo;
https://youtu.be/MtKBjPxGmyc

JOWERS, FEDERAL AGENCIES FOUND
LIABLE IN MURDERING DR. KING
Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther
King, III, Bernice King, Dexter Scott King and Yolanda King, Plaintiffs, v.
T.D. Loyd Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, Defendants.




Yemeni
child stolen and given to Ashkenazi woman

Adult
child with biological mother




















Israel
Celebrates Successful 9/11 Operation on Purim Holiday (click on photo to read article)

Israeli
schoolchildren dressed up as the burning
Twin
Towers. Costume won best prize.
Countries
that lost citizens on 9/11:
http://brilliantmaps.com/9-11-victims;
Israel
Did 9/11; Dr. Alan Sabrosky (click on photo
to
see Youtube video)

9/11
Alleged Hijackers Alive and Well (click on
photo
to see Youtube video)


![WTC Falling Death2[3]](chapter_105_more_court_shenanigans_files/image405.png)

















 
 






















|
The Crimes of Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere

“Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one
Jehovah.”
שְׁמַע,יִשְׂרָאֵל: יְהוָהאֱלֹהֵינוּ,יְהוָהאֶחָד
“Jehovah went on speaking to Moses, saying: “…’Any man of
Israel and any foreigner who resides in Israel who gives any of his offspring
to Molech should be put to death without fail…I myself will set my face
against that man, and I will cut him off from among his people, because he
has given some of his offspring to Molech and has defiled my holy place and
has profaned my holy name. If the people of the land should deliberately
close their eyes to what that man does when he gives his offspring to Molech
and they do not put him to death, then I myself will certainly set my face
against that man and his family. I will cut off that man from his people
along with all who join him in prostituting themselves to Molech.
 ![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_105_more_court_shenanigans_files/image452.png)     
      
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter
105:
More
Courtroom Shenanigans
Will Another U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judge Employ More
Talmudic Shenanigans? Or will its judiciary, in a show of support, plead
"I'm biased!"
and blacklist helpless plaintiff?
Cheryl D. Uzamere
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (718) 647-1708
Fax: (347) 227-0118
|
FAX
|
To:
|
Office Number
|
Fax Number
|
Hon. Barack H. Obama,
President, USA
Hon. Eric H. Holder, Att'y General, USDOJ
Tony West, Asst. Att'y General, USDOJ
Inspector General, U.S.
Postal Service
Hazel C. Keahey,
USCFC
|
1-202-456-1414
1-202-514-4507
1-202-514-3495
1-888-877-7644
1-202-357-6400
|
1-202-456-2461
1-202-514-4507
1-202-616-8470
1-866-756-6741
1-202-357-6401
|
Subject:
|
Please
ensure that my legal documents don't get lost in the mail
|
Date:
|
August
25, 2010
|
To Whom It May Concern:
In keeping with habit, I
have taken the liberty of uploading this correspondence to the
internet. I believe as does Mr. Obama, that there should be
transparency in government, especially where the judicial system is
concerned. You can review my web page containing this information at
http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.net/more_court_shenanigans.html.
I am a victim of the
Honorable Christine O.C. Miller's refusal to recuse herself from my
prior lawsuit pursuant to 28 USC 455. My prior lawsuit addresses the encroachment of the
Talmud-oriented Law of the
Moser (see attached), a religious
doctrine that requires its adherents not to report
each other's crimes to non-Jews. I believe that Judge Miller
is Jewish. I also believe that Judge Miller, also known as Christine Cook
Nettesheim,
violated the law by trying to adjudicate my lawsuit. If it were not for
U.S. Court of Federal Claim's Rule 41, Judge Nettesheim/Miller
would still be trying to adjudicate my claim. After this, I may have to
face an entire court boycotting me, but I digress...
It is not your
responsibility to deal with such problems. Your only problem is the
mail, and right now, so is mine. In the past, when I tried to use the
USPS' certified priority mail, returned receipt requested, my mail
mysteriously vanished. I made a point to attach the first page of my
lawsuit against the USPS to show that I had this problem in the past.
Can you please see to it
that my mail does not get lost this time? I know that because I
am a schvartze/worthless nigger that
Judge Miller does not give a damn about violating my rights.
I am sure that her violating my rights means nothing to the judiciary
of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims especially its Ashkenazi judiciary.
However, I think the USPS may treat me a little better. My
father, Harry Lee Duncan, Korean Conflict veteran, deceased, interred
at Calverton National Cemetery and yes, a former letter carrier for the
USPS, earned a decent living and assisted my mother in caring for ten
(10) children, so I don't see the USPS as all bad.
Please
have some pity for this worthless nigger and make sure my mail does not
get lost.
Thank
you for reading my fax.
Cheryl
D. Uzamere
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the United States
Court of Federal Claims
_________________________________
Cheryl D. Uzamere No.: ______________
Plaintiff, COMPLAINT
-
against - JURY
TRIAL DEMANDED
United States of America
Defendant.
_________________________________
1) At all times hereinafter
mentioned, Plaintiff was and still is a resident of the City of Brooklyn,
County of Kings and State of New York.
JURISDICTION
2) This Court has jurisdiction over
this action pursuant to 28 USC 1491, which says that The United
States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment
upon any claim against the United States founded...upon the
Constitution...
3) This Court has jurisdiction over
this action as it is an implied cause of action in the manner of Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
PARTIES
4) Defendant is the United States.
ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO DEFENDANT
5) Plaintiff alleges that in the
past, lawsuits that Plaintiff attempted to mail were mishandled by
employees of the United States Postal Service in a manner that rendered
the packages untraceable (see Exhibit A); so that in order to protect herself, Plaintiff has
mailed a copy of her lawsuit to the Honorable Barack H. Obama and the
Honorable Eric H. Holder via certified mail, return receipt requested
(see Exhibit B).
6) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant
the United States, by and through employee Hazel C. Keahey,
Clerk of Court for the United States Court of Federal Claims, interfered
with or assisted in interfering with the random judiciary selection
process so that the Honorable Christine O. C. Miller or a judge who is a
member of the Ashkenazim would be the only judges selected to adjudicate
Plaintiff's lawsuit, number 10-555C.
7) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant
the United States, by and through its employee the Honorable Christine O.
C. Miller, refused to self-disqualify from adjudicating Plaintiff's
lawsuit pursuant to 28 USC 455, although Plaintiff's lawsuit concerns the
encroachment of the Talmudic doctrine Law of the Moser into judicial
affairs, and although Judge Miller is Jewish; that had Plaintiff not sent
her notice of voluntary dismissal by priority mail and overnight mail
(see Exhibit C), Judge Miller would have attempted to adjudicate
Plaintiff's lawsuit in a manner to ensure that Plaintiff's lawsuit is
dismissed with prejudice (see Exhibit D).
8) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant
the United States, by and through Hazel C. Keahey
violated Plaintiff's First Amendment right to petition the government for
a redress of grievance by refusing to accept a faxed copy of her notice
for voluntary dismissal, even though Plaintiff informed Hazel C. Keahey of Plaintiff's intent to mail the notice to
voluntarily dismiss her lawsuit.
9) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant
the United States, by and through the Honorable Christine O.C. Miller
attempted to violate Plaintiff's First Amendment right with reference to
Plaintiff's right to be free from the establishment of a state religion
by attempting to adjudicate Plaintiff's lawsuit by invoking the Talmudic
doctrine Law of the Moser to prevent Plaintiff's lawsuit from being heard
fairly and impartially.
10) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant
the United States, by and through the Honorable Christine O. C. Miller
violated the Fourteenth Amendment with regard to Plaintiff's right to
equal protection under the law by attempting to adjudicating Plaintiff's
lawsuit for the sole purpose of rendering a decision in favor of
defendants who are Ashkenazi Jewish, and in favor of members of the
Ashkenazim to whom Plaintiff's lawsuit makes reference.
11) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's
judicial system has become a dictatorship that allows members of the
Ashkenazim to violate the U.S. Constitution and the constitutional rights
of non-Ashkenazim with impunity; that the aforesaid individuals'
violations are based on their enforcement of the Ashkenazim's Talmudic
doctrine Law of the Moser, a Jewish religious doctrine that prohibits
Ashkenazim from reporting the wrongdoings of Ashkenazim to secular
authorities.
12) Plaintiff alleges that the United
States Department of Justice's job, as it pertains to Ashkenazi judges,
is not to prosecute Ashkenazi judges who violate the U.S. Constitution,
but to prosecute individuals who challenge Ashkenazi judges'
unconstitutional acts; and that whether the aforesaid acts are based on
the recalcitrant refusal of Defendant's Ashkenazi judiciary to obey the
law, or based in Defendant's non-Ashkenazi judiciary's inability to
enforce the law, American citizens who are victimized by members of the
Ashkenazim are no longer safe because they will no longer be treated as
equal to the Ashkenazim by Defendant's Ashkenazi judiciary.
13) Plaintiff asserts that Plaintiff's
lawsuit 10-555C concerns judicial acts of fraud upon the court resulting
from Ashkenazi judges' enforcement of the Talmudic religious doctrine the
Law of the Moser in judicial settings (see E,
pages 63-65).
14) Plaintiff asserts that the current
lawsuit addresses the recent acts of Talmud-oriented fraud upon the court
committed by Hazel C. Keahey, Clerk of Court
for the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the Honorable Christine O.C.
Miller, judge of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims during Judge Miller's
failed attempt to adjudicate Plaintiff's lawsuit, number 10-555C.
15) Plaintiff alleges that the United
States, by and through Defendants Hazel C. Keahey
and the Honorable Christine O.C. Miller committed the following: 1)
violation of 28 USC 455, disqualification of judges; 2) violation of
Plaintiff's First Amendment right to freedom of speech; 3) violation of
Plaintiff's First Amendment right to be free from the establishment of a
government-sponsored religion; 4) violation of Plaintiff's Fifth
Amendment right to due process of law; and, 5) violation of Plaintiff's
Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection under the law.
16) That Plaintiff alleges that
Defendant the United States, by and through Defendant Hazel C. Keahey will continue to violate Plaintiff's rights by
following the instructions of the Honorable Christine O.C without
question; that Judge Miller will render a biased decision against
Plaintiff insofar as the Judge Miller, who is Ashkenazi, will adhere to
the Talmudic imperative not to report of the crimes of fellow Jews to
non-Jewish secular authorities; that Plaintiff will lose this lawsuit and
appeal it; and that when Plaintiff appeals it, the only judges who will
have control (e.g. whose opinions will count) are the following judges:
the Honorable Judge Daniel M. Friedman; the Honorable Judge Pauline
Newman; the Honorable Haldane Robert Mayer; the Honorable Judge S. Jay Plager and the Honorable Alvin A. Schall
all of whom Plaintiff alleges are Jewish and will follow Judge Miller's
lead and render a decision that is biased in favor of the Talmudic
imperative not to directly or indirectly report the crimes of fellow
Ashkenazim to secular authorities.
BACKGROUND FACTS
17) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant,
the United States, by and through employees Hazel C. Keahey
and the Honorable Christine O.C. Miller violated Plaintiff's constitutional
rights, to wit:
18) Plaintiff asserts that on or around
August 16, 2010, Plaintiff contacted the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to
see if her lawsuit was received.
19) Plaintiff asserts that Hazel C. Keahey told Plaintiff that her lawsuit was received
and was assigned to the Honorable Christine O.C. Miller.
20) Plaintiff asserts that Plaintiff
panicked based on her belief that Judge Miller is a member of the
Ashkenazim; and that based on the aforesaid belief, informed Ms. Keahey that she wished to withdraw her lawsuit.
21) That Plaintiff asserts that she
explained to Ms. Keahey that her lawsuit
concerned the encroachment of the Talmud in judicial settings, and that
Judge Miller was violating 28 USC 455 because she refused to disqualify
herself.
22) That Plaintiff contacted the U.S.
Department of Justice's Civil Division to ascertain whether Plaintiff's
lawsuit was received.
COUNT I
AS AN FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
DEFENDANT OWED PLAINTIFF THE DUTY TO SELF-DISQUALIFY
23) Plaintiff
asserts that Defendant owed Plaintiff the duty to
24) Plaintiff
asserts that Defendant failed to perform the duty to
25) Plaintiff
asserts that as a result of Defendant's failure to perform the aforesaid
duty, Plaintiff suffered____________
26) Plaintiff
asserts that as the victim of the deprivation of Plaintiff's _______
Amendment right, Plaintiff can sue for the violation of the Amendment
itself; and that the existence of a remedy for the violation is implied
because of the the importance of the right
violated.
COUNT II
AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
DEFENDANT OWED PLAINTIFF THE DUTY TO PROTECT HER RIGHT
TO EXERCISE FREE SPEECH
27) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant
owed Plaintiff the duty to
28) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant
failed to perform the duty to
29) Plaintiff asserts that as a result
of Defendant's failure to perform the aforesaid duty, Plaintiff
suffered____________
30) Plaintiff asserts that as the
victim of the deprivation of Plaintiff's _______ Amendment right,
Plaintiff can sue for the violation of the Amendment itself; and that the
existence of a remedy for the violation is implied because of the the importance of the right violated.
COUNT III
AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
DEFENDANT OWED PLAINTIFF THE DUTY TO PROTECT HER RIGHT TO
FREEDOM FROM A GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED RELIGION
31) Plaintiff
asserts that Defendant owed Plaintiff the duty to
32) Plaintiff
asserts that Defendant failed to perform the duty to
33) Plaintiff
asserts that as a result of Defendant's failure to perform the aforesaid
duty, Plaintiff suffered____________
34) Plaintiff
asserts that as the victim of the deprivation of Plaintiff's _______
Amendment right, Plaintiff can sue for the violation of the Amendment
itself; and that the existence of a remedy for the violation is implied
because of the the importance of the right
violated.
COUNT IV
AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
DEFENDANT OWED PLAINTIFF THE DUTY TO ENFORCE PLAINTIFF'S
RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW
35) Plaintiff
asserts that Defendant owed Plaintiff the duty to
36) Plaintiff
asserts that Defendant failed to perform the duty to
37) Plaintiff
asserts that as a result of Defendant's failure to perform the aforesaid
duty, Plaintiff suffered____________
38) Plaintiff asserts that as the
victim of the deprivation of Plaintiff's _______ Amendment right,
Plaintiff can sue for the violation of the Amendment itself; and that the
existence of a remedy for the violation is implied because of the the importance of the right violated.
COUNT IV
AS AND FOR A FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
DEFENDANT OWED PLAINTIFF THE DUTY TO ENFORCE PLAINTIFF'S RIGHT
TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW
39) Plaintiff
asserts that Defendant owed Plaintiff the duty to
40) Plaintiff
asserts that Defendant failed to perform the duty to
41) Plaintiff
asserts that as a result of Defendant's failure to perform the aforesaid
duty, Plaintiff suffered____________
42) Plaintiff
asserts that as the victim of the deprivation of Plaintiff's _______
Amendment right, Plaintiff can sue for the violation of the Amendment
itself; and that the existence of a remedy for the violation is implied
because of the importance of the right violated.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Cheryl D. Uzamere respectfully prays that
this Court grants a jury trial, and for this Court to render judgment
against the Defendant in the sum of $10,000,000.00 for the first, second,
third, fourth and fifth causes of action herein, together with the costs
and disbursement of this action, and for such other, further, and
additional relief as to this Court may seem just and proper.

Cheryl D. Uzamere
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|