|
|
THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s
DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL SADISM
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual
Sadism Disorder Diagnostic
Criteria 302.84 (F65.52)
Over
a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the
physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by
fantasies, urges, or behaviors.
The
individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or
the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or
impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
Diagnostic Features
The
diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to
individuals who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those
who deny any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of
another individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
.
. .Examples of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or
psychological suffering of another individual include individuals known to
have inflicted pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions
but who deny any urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may
further claim that known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional
or nonsexual. Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the
infliction of pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not
report any significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or
psychological suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny
having urges or fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it
follows that they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially
impaired by such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual
sadism disorder despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior
constitutes clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual
sadism (by satisfying Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their
paraphilically motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress,
harm, or risk of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B).
"Recurrent"
sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on
a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more
victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying
this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and
suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a
strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple
victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient
but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if
the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.
  
What the Babylonian Talmud says about the
worship of Molech: Mishnah. He
who gives of his seed to Molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers it to
Molech and causes it to pass through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the reverse, he incurs no
penalty, unless he does both.
Gemara.
The Mishnah teaches idolatry and giving to Molech. R(abbi) Abin said:
Our Mishnah is in accordance with the view that Molech worship is not
idolatry.
Informing
on Fellow Jews who Commit Crimes:
Mesira
in Modern Times
(Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Abodah
Zarah, Folio 26b)
Rabbi Michael J. Broyde*
The S. Daniel Abraham &
Ira L. Rennert Torah Ethics Project
The Orthodox Caucus
Toronto, Canada
Netivot HaTorah Day School
October 19, 2001, at 8:00 p.m.
Even
though Jewish law expects people to observe the laws of the land, and even
imposes that obligation as a religious duty, the Talmud recounts - in a
number of places - that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular
government, even when their conduct is a violation of secular law and even
when their conduct is a violation of Jewish law...Even is secular government...incorporate(s)
substantive Jewish law into secular law and punish violations of what is, in
effect, Jewish law, Jews would still be prohibited from cooperating with such
a system. Indeed, classical Jewish law treats a person who frequently informs
on others as a pursuer (a
rodef) who may be killed to prevent him from informing,
even without a formal court ruling.
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976 audiobook
murdered 30 days after this interview (click on video to hear Youtube
interview). In this video, Mr. Rosenthal talked about the Ashkenazi Jewish
plan to take over the United States and the world.
The Lost
Item of a Gentile: “If his intention is that he, and not
the faith or Israel, should be praised, or because he loves the Gentile and
has mercy on him, it is forbidden [to return the Gentile’s lost item]”)
Rabbis Say It’s OK to Kill Goyim:
This is not science fiction people. This is not said by some anti-Semitic KKK
or Neo-Nazis these are Rabbis saying it’s OK to kill non-Jews including
children. I have found most of the most damning information about Jewish
crimes comes from Jewish sources not so called anti-Semitic.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
Conspiracy of Silence – Banned Documentary: (click on any
photo to see Youtube video)
Conspiracy
of Silence is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a U.S. child sex
abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government.
Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a highly decorated Vietnam war
veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator, Conspiracy of Silence reveals how
rogue elements at all levels of government have been involved in systematic
child sex abuse and pedophilia to feed the base desires of key politicians.
Paul Bonacci: The Murder [1985 --
GRAPHIC! click on photos below to see Youtube video)
Paul Bonacci was one of many children who were taken from
Nebraska’s Boys Town foster care/adoption network, brought to the White House
and savagely raped. In this video, Mr. Bonacci describes being taken from the
White House with Nicholas and an unnamed boy. Paul and Nicholas were forced
to rape the boy at gunpoint by the person who filmed the event. Later the
unnamed child was sodomized by the person making the video until his anus
bled, kicked repeatedly in the head and then shot to death – all after being
raped in the White House by Ashkenazi/Jewish and non-Ashkenazi/Jewish
politicians and corporate leaders. Also see https://youtu.be/8b61iIQCapY.
Larry King: Overachiever
Editor’s
Note: Donald Gregg, National Security Advisor to George H.W. Bush was
tasked with silencing those involved. He turned to the CIA.
The Franklin Scandal was only one aspect of a much larger “call boy”
operation moving children and teenagers, picked up from Boys
Town, Catholic orphanages and off the streets, and housed in Washington
and New York primarily.
http://come-and-hear.com/editor/br_3.html
Click
on the two photos above to see video.
Israel’s
first female pimp, Angelique Sabag Gautiller, Israel's first female pimp
and one of many whore houses in Tel Aviv, Israel that Israeli pimps use to
force beautiful, delicate White ladies from Russia and Slavic countries who
have been tricked and lured with promises of respectable jobs in Israel and
then forced to part with their virginity and gang raped every night by
sexually perverted Israeli and Arab men.
·
How 11 New York City Babies Contracted Herpes Through - Health;
·
Baby Dies of Herpes Virus in Ritual Circumcision in NYC Orthodox ...;
·
Herpes cases among babies linked to ultra-Orthodox Jewish;
·
NYC, Orthodox Jews in talks over ritual after herpes cases - USA Today;
·
11 Babies Infected with Herpes in New York - Sandra Rose;
·
CDC: 11 infants contracted herpes due to controversial Jewish ...;
·
New York Baby Infected with Herpes After Metzitza B'peh;
·
New case of neonatal herpes caused by Jewish ... - New York Post;
·
Orthodox Rabbis Fight NYC's Effort to Warn Parents About Herpes ...
Jewish Wisdom: What is a Goy?
Talmudic Jews
'Non-Jews Goyim Are Beasts to
Serve
Us as Slaves'
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293:
"AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN (Breishit 9:25):
(Commentary omitted) ...R. Huna also said in R. Joseph's name: You [i.e. Noah
is speaking to Ham) have prevented me from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned.
R. Chiyya said: Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark, therefore Ham came
forth black-skinned while the dog publicly exposed its copulation.
N.Y. State Lawmaker Apologizes
for Blackface Costume
By Sonia Kennebeck, CNN
Tue February 26, 2013
Story Highlights
Brooklyn
Democrat Dov Hikind dressed in blackface for a Purim party.
He
apologized to "anyone who was offended" but added, "that was
not the intention."
One of his Assembly colleagues calls the apology "a
beginning" but inadequate.
Yair Netanyahu’s Night of Debauchery Revealed in Bombshell
Recordings: Younger
Netanyahu heard asking his friend, a gas tycoon's son, for NIS 400 for
strippers, saying he owed him for $20 billion deal advanced by PM (click on
photo to hear Yair audiotape)
“Rachel” (Vicki Polin) on Oprah Winfrey Show Discussing
“Rachel’s” Ashkenazi Jewish Parents Introducing Her to Ashkenazi Jewish
Ritual Murder and Rape of Children (click on photo to see Youtube video).
The
Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of the
victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for
Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is
demonic torture, sex and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as
sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including
non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping
members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping and killing. Like
the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved
force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race,
financial issues and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all
junkies use excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political,
religious, social or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless
they are stopped, they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite
for torture, deviant sex and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left
unchecked, will be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff
addicts. Nothing more – nothing less.
![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_93_petition_for_rehearing_files/image376.png)
Ashkenazi
sexual sadist achieving climax by using a whip to rape a helpless human being
to death.
https://youtu.be/Mg_13WJ4gDo;
https://youtu.be/MtKBjPxGmyc
JOWERS, FEDERAL AGENCIES FOUND
LIABLE IN MURDERING DR. KING
Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther
King, III, Bernice King, Dexter Scott King and Yolanda King, Plaintiffs, v.
T.D. Loyd Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, Defendants.
Yemeni
child stolen and given to Ashkenazi woman
Adult
child with biological mother
Israel
Celebrates Successful 9/11 Operation on Purim Holiday (click on photo to read article)
Israeli
schoolchildren dressed up as the burning
Twin
Towers. Costume won best prize.
Countries
that lost citizens on 9/11:
http://brilliantmaps.com/9-11-victims;
Israel
Did 9/11; Dr. Alan Sabrosky (click on photo
to
see Youtube video)
9/11
Alleged Hijackers Alive and Well (click on
photo
to see Youtube video)
![WTC Falling Death2[3]](chapter_93_petition_for_rehearing_files/image410.png)
 
 
|
The Crimes of Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere
“Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one
Jehovah.”
שְׁמַע,יִשְׂרָאֵל: יְהוָהאֱלֹהֵינוּ,יְהוָהאֶחָד
“Jehovah went on speaking to Moses, saying: “…’Any man of
Israel and any foreigner who resides in Israel who gives any of his offspring
to Molech should be put to death without fail…I myself will set my face
against that man, and I will cut him off from among his people, because he
has given some of his offspring to Molech and has defiled my holy place and
has profaned my holy name. If the people of the land should deliberately
close their eyes to what that man does when he gives his offspring to Molech
and they do not put him to death, then I myself will certainly set my face
against that man and his family. I will cut off that man from his people
along with all who join him in prostituting themselves to Molech.
 ![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_93_petition_for_rehearing_files/image457.png)     
      
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 93:
U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Rehearing
Petitioner was jailed twice
while questioning why racists Cuomo and Bloomberg
have refused to enlist their agencies to help her obtain child and
spousal support. Racist employees under their charge have
blacklisted Petitioner to prevent other government agencies from helping
her, rationalizing their illegal conduct because Petitioner is black
and mentally disabled. Cuomo's and Bloomberg's racist
administrations has gone so far as to use New York State Court
Officer Milo and New York City Police Officers Rall and Dellamo to
threaten to place Petitioner in a mental institution or arrest Petitioner
(without an arrest warrant?) to stop her from
talking. Will the Supreme Court give license
to Defendants discriminatory acts by denying
her petition to rehear her case?
Click
here to hear Officers Rall and Dellamo lie to Petitioner
|
|
*
Docket No. 09-5816
In The
Supreme Court of the United States
_________
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Petitioner,
- vs -
Allen E. Kaye, P.C., et al
Respondents.
______________
Petition for Rehearing
______________
On Writ of Certiorari to
the Supreme Court
of the United States Court
______________
|
Elena Kagan, Esq.
Solicitor General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20530
*
Barbara D. Underwood, Esq.
Solicitor General
NYS Attorney General
120 Broadway
New York, NY 10278
*
Larry A. Sonnenshein, Esq.
Asst. Corporation Counsel
New York City Law Dept.
100 Church Street
New York, NY 10007
|
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Appearing Pro Se
1209 Loring Avenue
Apt. 6B
Brooklyn, NY 11208
Tel.: (718) 647-1708
Fax: (267) 543-3317
|
|
|
PETITION FOR REHEARING
Cheryl D. Uzamere, appearing pro
se, respectfully petitions this Court for a rehearing of its October 13,
2009 decision. Specifically, Petitioner asks for an order (1) granting a
rehearing, (2) setting the case for argument and (3) reporting Defendants'
criminal acts to the appropriate law enforcement agencies pursuant
to 18 USC §4 and 18 USC §3290 so that Defendants can be punished for their crimes
against Petitioner and her family.
GROUNDS FOR REHEARING
Although this Court almost never
grants petitions for rehearing, this case meets the rare exception
contemplated by Sup. Ct. R. 44.1 and articulated in Ambler v. Whipple, 90 U.S. 278, 282 (1875): "If the omissions...on which the case was
heard are material to the decision of the case, it presents a strong
appeal for reargument."
As this Court did
not provide a reason for its denial, Petitioner is left with the daunting
task of figuring out the mind of the Court and the reason(s) for its
denial. One of Petitioner's beliefs is based in her concern that this
Court viewed the circumstances explained in Petitioner's writ of
certiorari as domestic issues that should be handled by Defendants the
State of New York and the City of New York.
“Courts historically have
recognized a jurisdictional bar to hearing domestic relations cases in
federal court. This is so even when the parties meet the requirements of
the federal diversity statute. In 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court in Ankenbrandt v. Richards sought to rein in the
so-called domestic relations exception, strictly limiting its use to
cases seeking declarations of divorce, alimony, or child custody.” In the case Ankenbrandt
v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 112 S. Ct. 2206, 119 L. Ed. 2d 468 (1992), the
Court held that Ankenbrandt's action was a tort
action, and as such, did not provide a permissible reason for the federal
court to invoke the domestic relations exception.
A similar case, Friedlander v. Friedlander, 149.F.3d, 739 (1998) was a lawsuit for intentional infliction of emotional
distress and related torts. While plaintiffs Maris Freed Burton G.
Friedlander were husband and wife, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Posner, in
stating the opinion of the Court, held that “...the domestic relations
exception to diversity jurisdiction did not extend to proceedings that
merely arise out of a domestic relations dispute; and any doubt about the
validity of that holding was dispelled by Ankenbrandt.
Had Mr. Friedlander murdered his former father-in-law, the ensuing suit
for wrongful death would not have been conducted by a domestic relations
court as an ancillary proceeding to the original divorce case; and it
makes no difference that, happily, he did not behave quite so
egregiously.” In like manner, Petitioner's lawsuit, while including the
egregiously actions of the Defendants during the adjudication of her
divorce action, submits information that was withheld by Defendants, to
dispel this honorable Court's misgivings regarding Petitioner's lawsuit
and to show that Petitioner's lawsuit is in the manner of Bivens, and
seeks monetary recovery based on Petitioner's well-founded allegations
against Defendants.
Another of Petitioner's concerns
is that her writ of certiorari was viewed by this Court as not
compelling. Petitioner asserts that this Court's and the lower Courts'
refusal to hear Petitioner's case has already had an
deleterious effect on the Petitioner and her daughter and forced them to
continue as victims of federal and state crimes at the hands of the
Defendants. Petitioner further assets that the deleterious effect on
impoverished African American families and their ability to obtain child
support enforcement services because of the Bivens-like actions of
Defendants New York State and New York City are compelling reasons for
this Court to grant Petitioner a rehearing.
I. REHEARING
IS WARRANTED INSOFAR AS STATE AND MUNICIPAL
DEFENDANTS
WITHHELD PROOF OF PETITIONER'S ALLEGATIONS
A. Defendants Failed to Comply
with Federal Fequirement to Ensure that Petitioner
Received Child Support
Less than a year after the
pregnant Petitioner was abandoned by her husband, Petitioner sought and
was found eligible for public assistance. Although Petitioner managed to
secure employment, Petitioner's periods of employment were sporadic,
requiring constant reliance on Defendant New York City's Human Resources
Administration (hereinafter "NYCHRA"). When an application for
public assistance has children, the recipient has a responsibility to
cooperate with NYCHRA by providing as much detailed information as
possible regarding the putative parent's income. For each
and every occasion for which Petitioner applied for public
assistance through Defendant New York City's HRA New York State's
Department of Social Services, Petitioner complied with both the letter
and the spirit of the law (see attached Petitioner's Agreement to Refund
Support Payments).
Eventually, because Petitioner
was not able to obtain Defendants' assistance in securing child support
from her husband, Petitioner was forced to place her children in the care
of Defendants New York City's and New York State's foster care system
(see transcript pages numbered “1” and “62” regarding ).
Throughout the few years in which Petitioner had physical custody of her
children, Petitioner applied for and received public assistance for
herself and her children (see Certificate of (arrest) Warrant, Docket
Number F-5076/80, Cheryl Uzamere v. Godwin Uzamere and
Petition for Support F-8177/85, Cheryl v. Ehigie Uzamere).
(under construction
-- check back later!)
Does the rank and file of the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability
Assistance and the New York City Human Resources Administration plan to
tell the tax-paying public that they prefer to allow Judge Sunshine to
find Petitioner ineligible for any finances from her former spouse so
that Petitioner continues to be a public charge? Did the aforesaid
agencies discharge Petitioner's husband from his responsibility to repay
them for the care of his wife and daughter? Are the aforesaid agencies'
secretaries and commissioners willing to tell the tax-paying public that
even now, while Petitioner is presently and has been in receipt of SSI,
Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps for at least the past 11 years that
Defendant Judge Sunshine's decision to grant Petitioner no money from her
former husband and to leave Petitioner in the financial care of American
taxpayers is legal? If so, then they are accomplices, not only in
Defendants' crimes against the Petitioner, but in crimes against U.S.
citizenry.
B. Defendants
Withheld Proof of Petitioner's Attempts to Obtain Child Support
C. Defendant
New York State Allowed Its Courts/Judges to Deprive Petitioner of Spousal
and Child Support
D. Defendants
Engaged in Silencing Petitioner by Blacklisting in
Violation of Federal
Whistleblowing Statutes
II.
REHEARING IS APPROPRIATE EVEN IF OTHER GROUNDS SUFFICE TO JUSTIFY THE
COURT DISPOSITION
A.
This Court's
denial to rehearing petition should not preclude this Court's
responsibility pursuant to 18 USC
§4
B.
This Court must
find that Defendants committed federal crimes and ensure that they are
punished, even if this Court denies rehearing
C.
This Court must
find that Defendants' false arrests and refusal to listen to
Petitioner were attempts to blacklist and silence Petitioner in
violation of federal whistle-blowing statutes
D.
This Court must
find that based on Petitioner's allegations of wrongdoing, Defendants
made themselves fugitives of justice for which there is no statute
of limitations pursuant to 18 USC
§3290
E.
This Court must
find that Defendants' commission of state law gave rise to their
commission of federal law; violations of state laws (fraud, etc.)
are not included as grounds for this petition (to be continued)
Rehearing would promote the law
enforcement capability of this Court. This Court could then ensure that
those Defendants that committed constitutional violations that resulted
in Petitioner's inability to obtain federally-funded child support
enforcement services are punished. It would address that which has now
become Defendants New York State's and New York City's habit of violating
its citizens constitutional violations, knowing that even if the victims
appeal to this Court, the likelihood of those victims being heard by this
Court is next to impossible, thereby giving those who have been
victimized by Defendants the impression that this Court gives its tacit
permission.
U.S. Supreme Court
Justice the Honorable Felix Frankfurter said in his opinions
regarding Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954) and Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960) that “justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.”
This Court would be in violation of its own law if it, in addition to not
granting the rehearing, acted in a manner that Defendants would construe,
not only as this Court denial to rehear, but as this Court's tacit
permission to continue violating the laws, thereby allowing Defendants to
be unjustly enriched by receiving federal monies to place children in
foster care – children who would ordinary not have be placed in foster
care if Defendants actively implemented child support enforcements
efforts for which they fraudulently accept federal funding but do not
enforce.
It is frightening to considers
that the vast majority of children placed in
foster care in the State of New York are African American children from
homes led by impoverished single mothers. It is even more frightening to
consider that most African American mothers will not use the internet as
a tool to disseminate governmental abuse as the Petitioner did (http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.com), nor will most African American mothers in the State of
New York use the courts to challenge the illegal, racist status quo that
renders African children Defendants' largest consumers, as the Petitioner
has done. Many, if not most, will quietly take the governmental abuse,
while Defendants the State of New York and the City of New York pursue
their narrow-minded goal of hoarding federal funds to place impoverished
African American children in foster care faster than they would assisting
their mothers to obtain child support.
Such an unjust
stance on this Court's part would leave Petitioner with no trust in this
Court, abject hatred for American law, despair that she and her children
were left in an impoverished state based on the deprivation of her
family's constitutional rights by the Defendants; and left to believe
that without a show of force like that used by Sengbe
and those kidnapped Africans of United States v. Libellants and Claimants
of the Schooner Amistad, 40 U.S. (15 Pet.) 518 (1841), Petitioner and her
children will also be in position to forever have their constitutional
rights violated by the Defendants, whether or not Petitioner violates the
law.
Conclusion
Accordingly, the Petitioner
respectfully asks this Court to grant Petitioner's request for rehearing,
for this Court to ensure that the Defendants are held criminally liable
for their illegal acts against Petitioner and her family, and for the
privilege to argue Petitioner's writ of certiorari before this honorable
Court.
A Marriage of Convenience: Federal
Abstention in Domestic Relations Cases by Kate Swift, (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1194693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What To Do When A Police Officer Says:
"I've Have A
Warrant For Your Arrest"
|
|
|
Click on either picture to
visit site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
