Both of My Children Were
Molested in Foster Care. Member of the Democratic Party Have Ganged up on My
Family to Stop Us from Telling Our Story.
Proof
that Ehigie Edobor Uzamere Was Still Married to Me at the Time that He
Celebrated his 25th
Wedding Anniversary with 2nd Wife Iriagbonse Irowa.
Federal Law Enforcement
Visits My Apartment Without Warrants to Kill Me and Take My Computer Under
the Guise of “Counterterrorism.”
Telephone Call with
Verizon Employees Who Confirm that Verizon Violated NACHA and EFTA Rules by
Taking Money from My Paid Telephone Bill and Sending it to Metavante
Corporation 18 Days after I Paid the Bill
Proof
that Verizon’s Telephone Service Was Off by February 3, 2018
Problems with Social
Security Administration: Proof that the Social Security Administration Sent
Two Test Checks to Confirm the Existence of my Paypal Prepaid Account
Problems with the
Social Security Administration: Proof that the Social Security Administration
Illegally Held my SSDI Check
THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH
AND DSM V’s DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL SADISM
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Illnesses; Sexual Sadism Disorder Diagnostic Criteria 302.84 (F65.52)
Over a period of at
least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the physical or psychological
suffering of another person, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or behaviors.
The individual has
acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or the sexual urges
or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social,
occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
Diagnostic Features
The diagnostic criteria
for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to individuals who
freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those who deny any
sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another
individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
. . .Examples of
individuals who deny any interest in the physical or psychological suffering
of another individual include individuals known to have inflicted pain or
suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions but who deny any urges or
fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may further claim that known
episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional or nonsexual. Others may
admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the infliction of pain or
suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not report any significant or
sustained sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another
individual. Since these individuals deny having urges or fantasies involving
sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it follows that they would also deny
feeling subjectively distressed or socially impaired by such impulses. Such
individuals may be diagnosed with sexual sadism disorder despite their
negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior constitutes clinical support
for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual sadism (by satisfying Criterion
A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their paraphilically motivated
behavior is causing clinically significant distress, harm, or risk of harm to
others (satisfying Criterion B).
"Recurrent"
sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on
a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more
victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying
this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and
suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a
strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple
victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient
but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if
the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.
What the Babylonian Talmud says about the
worship of Molech: Mishnah. He
who gives of his seed to Molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers it to
Molech and causes it to pass through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the reverse, he incurs no
penalty, unless he does both.
Gemara. The
Mishnah teaches idolatry and giving to Molech. R(abbi) Abin said: Our
Mishnah is in accordance with the view that Molech worship is not idolatry.
Even though
Jewish law expects people to observe the laws of the land, and even imposes
that obligation as a religious duty, the Talmud recounts - in a number of
places - that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular government,
even when their conduct is a violation of secular law and even when their
conduct is a violation of Jewish law...Even is secular government...incorporate(s)
substantive Jewish law into secular law and punish violations of what is, in
effect, Jewish law, Jews would still be prohibited from cooperating with such
a system. Indeed, classical Jewish law treats a person who frequently informs
on others as a pursuer (a
rodef) who may be killed to prevent him from informing,
even without a formal court ruling.
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976
audiobook murdered 30 days after this interview (click on video to hear
Youtube interview). In this video, Mr. Rosenthal talked about the Ashkenazi
Jewish plan to take over the United States and the world.
The Lost
Item of a Gentile: “If his intention is that he, and not the
faith or Israel, should be praised, or because he loves the Gentile and has mercy
on him, it is forbidden [to return the Gentile’s lost item]”)
Rabbis Say It’s OK to Kill Goyim:
This is not science fiction people. This is not said by some anti-Semitic KKK
or Neo-Nazis these are Rabbis saying it’s OK to kill non-Jews including
children. I have found most of the most damning information about Jewish
crimes comes from Jewish sources not so called anti-Semitic.
Conspiracy of Silence – Banned Documentary: (click on any
photo to see Youtube video)
Conspiracy
of Silence is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a U.S. child sex
abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government.
Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a highly decorated Vietnam war
veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator, Conspiracy of Silence reveals how
rogue elements at all levels of government have been involved in systematic
child sex abuse and pedophilia to feed the base desires of key politicians.
Paul Bonacci: The Murder [1985 --
GRAPHIC! click on photos below to see Youtube video)
Paul Bonacci was one of many children who were taken from
Nebraska’s Boys Town foster care/adoption network, brought to the White House
and savagely raped. In this video, Mr. Bonacci describes being taken from the
White House with Nicholas and an unnamed boy. Paul and Nicholas were forced
to rape the boy at gunpoint by the person who filmed the event. Later the
unnamed child was sodomized by the person making the video until his anus
bled, kicked repeatedly in the head and then shot to death – all after being
raped in the White House by Ashkenazi/Jewish and non-Ashkenazi/Jewish
politicians and corporate leaders. Also see https://youtu.be/8b61iIQCapY.
Editor’s
Note: Donald Gregg, National Security Advisor to George H.W. Bush was
tasked with silencing those involved. He turned to the CIA.
The Franklin Scandal was only one aspect of a much larger “call boy”
operation moving children and teenagers, picked up from Boys
Town, Catholic orphanages and off the streets, and housed in Washington
and New York primarily.
Israel’s
first female pimp, Angelique Sabag Gautiller, Israel's first female pimp
and one of many whore houses in Tel Aviv, Israel that Israeli pimps use to
force beautiful, delicate White ladies from Russia and Slavic countries who
have been tricked and lured with promises of respectable jobs in Israel and
then forced to part with their virginity and gang raped every night by
sexually perverted Israeli and Arab men.
"AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN (Breishit 9:25):
(Commentary omitted) ...R. Huna also said in R. Joseph's name: You [i.e. Noah
is speaking to Ham) have prevented me from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned.
R. Chiyya said: Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark, therefore Ham came
forth black-skinned while the dog publicly exposed its copulation.
N.Y. State Lawmaker Apologizes for
Blackface Costume By Sonia Kennebeck, CNN Tue February 26, 2013
Story Highlights
Brooklyn
Democrat Dov Hikind dressed in blackface for a Purim party.
He
apologized to "anyone who was offended" but added, "that was
not the intention."
One of his Assembly colleagues calls the apology "a
beginning" but inadequate.
Yair Netanyahu’s Night of Debauchery Revealed in Bombshell
Recordings: Younger
Netanyahu heard asking his friend, a gas tycoon's son, for NIS 400 for
strippers, saying he owed him for $20 billion deal advanced by PM (click on
photo to hear Yair audiotape)
“Rachel” (Vicki Polin) on Oprah Winfrey Show Discussing
“Rachel’s” Ashkenazi Jewish Parents Introducing Her to Ashkenazi Jewish
Ritual Murder and Rape of Children (click on photo to see Youtube video).
The
Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of
the victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for
Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is
demonic torture, sex and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as
sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including
non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping
members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping and killing. Like
the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved
force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race,
financial issues and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all
junkies use excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political,
religious, social or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless
they are stopped, they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite
for torture, deviant sex and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left
unchecked, will be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff
addicts. Nothing more – nothing less.
Ashkenazi
sexual sadist achieving climax by using a whip to rape a helpless human being
to death.
Israel
Did 9/11; Dr. Alan Sabrosky (click on photo
to
see Youtube video)
9/11
Alleged Hijackers Alive and Well (click on
photo
to see Youtube video)
The Crimes of Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere
“Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one
Jehovah.”
שְׁמַע,יִשְׂרָאֵל: יְהוָהאֱלֹהֵינוּ,יְהוָהאֶחָד
“Jehovah
went on speaking to Moses, saying: “…’Any man of Israel and any foreigner who
resides in Israel who gives any of his offspring to Molech should be put to
death without fail…I myself will set my face against that man, and I will cut
him off from among his people, because he has given some of his offspring to
Molech and has defiled my holy place and has profaned my holy name. If the
people of the land should deliberately close their eyes to what that man does
when he gives his offspring to Molech and they do not put him to death, then
I myself will certainly set my face against that man and his family. I will
cut off that man from his people along with all who join him in prostituting
themselves to Molech.
Rabbi Moses Maimonides (RamBam), Guide to the Perplexed:
“[T]he Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from
among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like
that of irrational animals. To my mind they do not have the rank of men but
have among the beings a rank lower than the rank of man but higher than the
rank of apes. For they have the external shape and lineaments of a man and
a faculty of discernment that is superior to that of the apes.
(https://www.sefaria.org/Guide_for_the_Perplexed%2C_Part_3.51?lang=bi)
http://www.come-and-hear.com/supplement/so-daat-emet/en_gentiles4.html#f3): M. You Shall Not Hate: It is written in
the Torah (Leviticus 19:17): "You shall not hate your
brother in your heart. You shall certainly rebuke your neighbor, and
not suffer sin on his account" -- so it is clearly stated in the Torah
that this prohibition specifically regards Jews. And so, Maimonides wrote
in The Laws of Mental States, chapter 6, halacha 6 (in the printed edition,
halacha 5): "Anyone who hates a Jew in his heart transgresses a
negative commandment, as it says: 'You shall not hate your brother in
your heart'." Thus, he also wrote in Sefer HaMitzvot, negative
commandment 302, and likewise it appears in Sefer HaChinuch,
commandment 245 (in other editions 238).
One may take
revenge against or bear a grudge towards Gentiles; likewise, the commandment "love your neighbor" applies
only to Jews, not to Gentiles.: N. You Shall Not Avenge or Bear a Grudge
-- And You Shall Love Your Neighbor as Yourself: It is written in the
Torah (Leviticus 19:18): "You shall not avenge, nor bear any grudge
against the children of your people, but you shall love your neighbor
as yourself: I am the Lord" -- here also the verse yells out "the
children of your people." In Torat Cohanim on the portion
of Kedoshim, chapter 4, halacha 12: "You shall not avenge nor
bear a grudge against the children of your people -- but you can
avenge and bear a grudge against others" (that is, against Gentiles --
explanation of the Ra'avad ..." In chapter 6 of The Laws of
Mental States, halacha 4 (in the printed edition, halacha 3): "It is a
commandment for every person to love each and every Jew as
he loves himself, as it says: 'You shall love your neighbor as
yourself'."
Artsot Ha-Hayyim: In 1992 a book
was published by a leading member of the Satmar community
entitled Artsot Ha-Hayyim. On p. 52 he explains, and quotes other
rabbis, that the reason Abraham Lincoln was killed was because he freed the
blacks. this is also the reason why Kennedy was killed, i.e. because he was
good to the blacks. He continues by saying that this will be the fate of
any who adopt a progressive attitude towards blacks, because they are meant
to be enslaved. His source for this is Ham's curse.
Babylonian Talmud,
Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio p. 745, 108b: "Our Rabbis
taught: Three copulated in the ark, and they were all punished - the dog,
the raven and Ham. The dog was doomed to be tied, the raven expectorates
[his seed into his mate's mouth], and Ham was smitten in his skin."
(This is footnoted, and the footnote reads: "I.e., from him was
descended Cush (the negro), who is black-skinned."
Midrash Rabbah
(Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293:
"AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN (Breishit 9:25): (Commentary omitted)
...R. Huna also said in R. Joseph's name: You [i.e. Noah is speaking to
Ham) have prevented me from doing something in the dark [i.e. cohabiting
with his wife], therefore your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned. R.
Chiyya said: Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark, therefore Ham came forth
black-skinned while the dog publicly exposed its copulation."
Legends
of the Jews; The Curse of Drunkenness: The descendants of Ham through
Canaan therefore have red eyes, because Ham looked upon the nakedness of
his father; they have misshapen lips, because Ham spoke with his lips to
his brothers about the unseemly condition of his father; they have twisted
curly hair… The last will and testament of Canaan addressed to his children
read as follows: "Speak not the truth; hold not yourselves aloof from
theft; lead a dissolute life; hate your master with an exceeding great hate;
and love one another."
CHERYL D. UZAMERE, appearing on Her Own Behalf and on
Behalf of Her Children DAVID PAUL
WALKER and TARA ANN UZAMERE
as Victims of the Babylonian Talmud-Fomented Human Trafficking for the Sex
Trade of Children
Plaintiffs,
- vs. –
CITY OF NEW YORK;
NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY;
BABYLONIAN TALMUD-ADHERENT ASHKENAZI
JEWISH LEADERS AND BABYLONIAN-TALMUD JUDAISM AS A HATE GROUP UNDER THE
FIGHTING WORDS DOCTRINE;
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE;
BILL DIBLASIO, in His Official Capacity as Mayor, CITY OF NEW YORK;
NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY;
KATHRYN GARCIA, in Her Official Capacity as Interim Chair
and Chief Executive Officer of the NEW
YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY;
KELLY MACNEAL, in Her Official Capacity as General
Counsel for the NEW YORK CITY
HOUSING AUTHORITY;
VERIFIED
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES
DEMAND
FOR REPARATIONS BASED ON THE BABYLONIAN TALMUDIC SPONSORSHIP AND
MAINTENANCE OF ANTI-BLACK HATRED TO FACILITATE THE KIDNAPPING AND ANAL
SODOMY OF BOYS OF AFRICAN DESCENT AND ENSUING GENOCIDE
DEMAND
FOR A JURY TRIAL
MOTION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS
MOTION
TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY
DEMAND FOR REASONABLE
ACCOMMODATIONS/GUARDIAN AD LITEM
MOTION FOR SERVICE BY
AN ENTITY SPECIALLY APPOINTED BY THE COURT
International Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)
International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR)
Convention
against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment (CAT)
Optional
Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of
Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography (OP-CRC-SC)
Civil
Action for Rico/Racketeering and Conspiracy to Engage in a Pattern of
Racketeering Activity (pursuant to Chevron
Corp. v. Donziger);
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STANLEY BREZENOFF, in His Former Capacity as Interim Chair
and Chief Executive Office of the NEW
YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY;
DAVID FARBER, Individually and in His Former Capacity
as General Counsel for the NEW YORK
CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY;
KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE;
“JOHN DOES”/ “JANE DOES”, Individually and in Their Official
Capacity for the KINGS COUNTRY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
NEW YORK COUNTRY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE
“JOHN DOES”/ “JANE DOES”, Individually and in Their Official
Capacity for the NEW YORK COUNTRY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER;
SCOTT STRINGER, Individually and in His Official Capacity
as Comptroller for the NEW YORK CITY
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER;
SEUNG H. WAN KIM, Individually and in His
Official Capacity as Assistant Comptroller, Law and Adjustment for the NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF THE
COMPTROLLER;
ADAM KARP, Individually and in His
Official Capacity as Director of the Torts Division for the NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF THE
COMPTROLLER;
MICHAEL CLINTON, Individually and in His
Official Capacity, Law Division (Non-Tort) for the NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER;
DAVID BARBARO, Individually and His
Official Capacity as Division Chief (Personal Injury) for the NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Cheryl
D. Uzamere, the Plaintiff in the above entitled action, is a practicing
Christian and a servant of Jehovah and a member of the Jehovah’s Witness
sect, the Most High God, God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Jesus Christ. The
Plaintiff is disabled pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act. She
is the mother of David Paul Walker and Tara Ann Uzamere, children who were
victims of terrorism by Defendants New York State and New York City’s
Babylonian Talmud-based foster care system, who were trafficked by Defendants
State of New York and City of New York for purposes of the Babylonian
Talmud-fomented trafficking of humans for the sex trade. The Plaintiff is
an individual against whom the extrajudicial sentence of death has been
ordered pursuant to Babylonian Talmudic law regarding the practice of
Christianity and the religious crime of meshira/mesira (whistleblowing).
Based on those matters in which
Plaintiff was personally involved, and on information and belief as to all
other matters, the Plaintiff makes the following statements under penalty
of perjury:
STATEMENT OF MY SON, DAVID PAUL WALKER’S SEXUAL ABUSE
WHILE A CLIENT AT JCCA-EDENWALD GROUP HOME
1)The Plaintiff became aware of the incident
described below sometime during 2018. The Plaintiff’s son, David Paul
Walker described an occasion where, while he was six years old, he was in a
setting where the employees of JCCA-Edenwald did not supervise the sleeping
area, nor provide security cameras or security guards to ensure that the
Plaintiff’s son’s or other foster children were safe:
Please
Mr. Don’t touch me there, I’m only six…love you not, hate you a lot, Shall
we commence to crucifix???...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
When I was a little boy, teenage boy masturbated in
front of me, then politely ask me to lick???... “If you come near me, I’ll
scream”, First time seeing someone else’s dick…So easy to pass judgment, tell
everybody else what to do…Say stranger, my advice but your ass, shall we
suffer together for a spell or two???
Disturbed by
the vacant lifeless expression in my eyes yes???...Systematic rape of my
soul…prolonged torture of my mind, please my darling. I wholeheartedly
invite you to try your best…”
AFFIDAVIT OF MY DAUGHTER, TARA ANN UZAMERE THAT WAS
IGNORED BY NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE JEFFREY S. SUNSHINE
2)The Plaintiff daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere, now a
registered nurse with the State of New York for over 10 years, submitted
New York State-notarized Affidavit in which she described Defendant
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, at that time a senator for the Federal Republic of
Nigeria, her father:
I, Tara A. Uzamere, being duly
sworn, depose and say that:
1)I am the daughter of the Plaintiff and the Defendant
in the above entitled action...
2)I make this Affidavit based on the following facts:
3)That the Plaintiff has always told me that Defendant
is my father ever since I was a child.
4)That I met the Defendant for the first time at JFK
Airport in Jamaica, New York around the year 2004 to the best of my
recollection.
5)That I took a photograph of the Defendant during the
aforesaid visit. Photograph taken at JFK Airport is hereby attached as Exhibit A.
6)That on the day that I first met the Defendant at JFK
Airport, I called my friend Eusi Patterson on the cell phone that I used
to take a photograph of the Defendant.
7)That on the aforesaid day the Defendant openly and
notoriously introduced himself to Eusi as my father.
8)That I met and visited the Defendant's late brother,
John Uzamere at 476 Amboy Street.
9)That the Defendant and his brother George Uzamere
openly and notoriously visited me when I lived at 489 Ray Street,
Freeport, New York.
10)That while I was a resident in Freeport, New York, I
experienced a car accident, and that George Uzamere and the Defendant
openly and notoriously sent checks to pay the rest of my car note to
Drive Financial, a financing company based in Dallas, Texas.
11)That the Defendant openly and notoriously visited me
when I lived at Nichol Road in Wyandanch, New York.
12)That the Defendant met my landlord, Martin Marta when
the Defendant visited me while I was living at the aforesaid address.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13)That during the aforesaid meeting the Defendant openly
and notoriously identified himself to my landlord as my father.
14)That I spoke with Wellington Uzamere on the telephone
several times before and after I first met the Defendant.
15)That Wellington Uzamere referred to the Defendant as
"Ehigie."
16)That based on information received from members of the
Edo/Bini community as well as my own belief, my facial structure
resembles that of the Defendant as evidenced in my photograph hereby
attached as Exhibit B.
17)That while I spend three or four pleasant occasions with
the Defendant and received monetary gifts during those occasions, the
Defendant has never been a consistent part of my life as I explained in
the report [that] I provided to Nigerian newspaper Huhu Online. See
aforesaid report hereby attached as Exhibit
C.
18)That based on what I learned at Long Island College
School of Nursing regarding psychiatric nursing and psychiatric
illnesses, as well as personal day-to-day observation of the Plaintiff,
that while the Plaintiffs predominate affect is consistent with what I
believe to be hypomania, the Plaintiff is not psychotic and does not
require hospitalization, as untruthfully implied by Eugene Uzamere's
defamatory characterization of the Plaintiff as "certifiably
insane" to Nigerian newspaper Point Blank News Online, hereby
attached as Exhibit D.
19)That before 2004 the Defendant never visited me; never
celebrated a birthday with me; never kissed me; never told me he loved
me; never wiped away my tears; never talked to me about God; never
attended a house of God with me; never read me a Bible story; never
talked to me about how to comport myself around men or the importance of
being a chaste woman; never let other men know that I was precious to
him; never let other men know that they would be responsible to him if
they hurt me; never held my hand; never walked with me; never sat me on
his lap; never played games with me; never took me to the movies; never
picked me up; never gave me a hug; never attended a school meeting with
my teachers; never visited me in the hospital; never told me he was proud
of me; never accompanied me to a father-daughter dance, never attended a
graduation; never invited other members of the Edo/Bini community to a
naming ceremony in honor of my birth; never told me that he was glad I
was born and never treated me like he loved me and wanted to protect me
from the dangers of the world the way normal fathers do with their
daughters, and especially in the manner that Nigerian men are known to
treat their children.
20)That the falsely concocted "counter-affidavit"
and the falsely concocted affirmation by Eugene Uzamere makes me feel
heartsick because I have always been made to believe by the Plaintiff,
the Defendant and members of the Defendant's family that the Defendant is
my father and that being a blood member of the Uzamere clan, a blood
member of the proud and ancient Edo/Bini nation and culture and being a
native Nigerian based on consanguinity are my birthrights and a part of
who I am; that the aforesaid "counter-affidavit- and attorney's
affirmation are emotionally and psychologically abusive as they suggest
that I am a bastard child while the Defendant is not willing to end the
question of paternity by taking a simple DNA test.
21)That I now experience financial difficulties such that I
do not have money to return to college to continue studying nursing, and
that because of the Plaintiffs advanced age and disability, it is very
difficult for her to obtain employment to help me pay for college; PELL
grant rejection information is attached at Exhibit E.
22)That I am willing to submit myself for honest DNA
testing to confirm that the Defendant is my father if conditions can be
controlled so that the Defendant does not know and cannot access the
location of the laboratory where said DNA test is performed so that the
Defendant does not unduly influence anyone to lie about the results of
the DNA test as it seems the Defendant was able to do on the marriage affidavit
where the municipal clerk signed his/her name to indicate that he/she
verified the Defendant's
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
age, but that on
inspection of said page, did not mark off any box to indicate the type of
identification the municipal clerk used to verify the Defendants age and
date of birth and identity; see Plaintiff's Affidavit and Application for
License to Marry, top of back page hereby attached as Exhibit F.
WHEREFORE, as the Defendant has forced the
Plaintiff and I to suffer domestic violence as identified by the U.S. Justice
Department's Office of Violence Against Women, I respectfully ask that
this Court considers that the Plaintiff is not just pleading for herself
but for our entire family; that this Court grant the Plaintiffs lawful
and just request to dismiss attorney Eugene Uzamere's falsified
affirmation in its entirety, and to grant the Plaintiff's motion for
default judgment and money judgment in its entirety.
INTRODUCTION
3)The primary cause of this action
is a widespread criminal enterprise
engaged in a pattern of
racketeering activity across State lines, and a conspiracy to
engage in racketeering activity
involving numerous RICO predicate acts during the past ten (10) calendar
years.
4)The Plaintiff alleges that the
predicate acts alleged here cluster around Defendants’ violation of the
Plaintiff’s and her children’s First Amendment rights to free speech and
to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Every act
committed by the Defendants was designed to and to continue to inflict
severe and sustained economic hardship upon Plaintiff, with the intent of
violating the Plaintiff’s and her children’s First Amendment rights to
freedom of speech and to petition the government for a redress of
grievances by impairing, obstructing, preventing and discouraging
Plaintiff from writing about the crimes that were and are still being
committed against Plaintiff and her children by the Defendants; and by
disabling and/or destroying Plaintiff’s website, http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.net that has recorded the Defendants’ criminal acts
against the Plaintiff and her children since 2008.
5)This is a complex civil action for RICO remedies
authorized by the federal statutes at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.; for
declaratory and injunctive relief; for actual, consequential and
exemplary damages; and for all other relief which this honorable District
Court deems just and proper under all circumstances which have occasioned
this Verified Complaint. See 18
U.S.C. §§1964(a) and (c) (“Civil RICO”).
6)Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 USC §1983
for violations of civil rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments
to the United States Constitution.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7)The Plaintiff’s civil action for RICO is also based in
the Second Circuit Court of Appeal’s interpretation and adjudication of
the case, Chevron Corp. v. Donziger,
which author Anna Hanke’s article entitled Equitable Relief for Private RICO Plaintiffs: Using Donziger to
Remedy Courthouse Corruption states:
…the
Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District
Court for the Southern District of New York in Chevron Corp. v. Steven
Donziger ("Donziger"). This decision granted Chevron
an equitable remedy under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations ("RICO") Act, and the injunction prevented
forty-eight injured Ecuadorean plaintiffs (the “Lago Agrio plaintiffs,”
or “LAPs”), represented by Donziger,
from enforcing their $8.646 billion judgment granted in Ecuadorean
court…The United States Department of Justice has frequently used the
RICO Act to fight racketeering since it was enacted, but Donziger was the first time that
the Second Circuit had decided the issue of whether a private individual
or corporation, as opposed to a government agency, could receive
equitable relief as a plaintiff in a RICO case.
8)The Plaintiff alleges that the predicate acts alleged
here cluster around Defendants’ violation of the Plaintiff’s and her
children’s First Amendment rights free speech and to petition the
government for a redress of grievances. Every act committed by the Defendants
was designed to and to continue to inflict severe and sustained economic
hardship upon Plaintiff, with the intent of violating the Plaintiff’s and
her children’s First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and to
petition the government for a redress of grievances by impairing,
obstructing, preventing and discouraging Plaintiff from writing and
publishing information on the internet and elsewhere regarding crimes
that were and are still being committed against the Plaintiff and her
children.
9) The predicate acts associated
with RICO to which the Plaintiff refers include: 1) 18 U.S.
Code §1201, kidnapping; 2) 18 USC §1028 (relating to fraud and
related activity in connection with identification documents); 3) 18 USC
§1344 (relating to financial institution fraud); 4) 18 USC §1503
(relating to obstruction of justice, including malicious prosecution
based on Defendant U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s named employees
misuse of the federal court system by commencing actions in federal court
that were dismissed against the Plaintiff in their entirety); 5) 18 USC
§1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement); 7)
18 USC §1512 (relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an
informant); 8) 18 USC §1513 (relating to retaliating against a witness,
victim, or an informant; 9) 18 USC §1543 (relating to forgery or false
use of passport); 10) 18 USC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
18
USC §1581–1592 (relating to peonage, slavery, and trafficking); 18 USC
§1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion); 18
USC §2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2260 (relating to sexual exploitation of
children); any act which is indictable under the Immigration and
Nationality Act; and any act that is indictable under any provision
listed in section 2332b(g)(5)(B) (civil action for violation of the
Antiterrorism Act).
10)Other predicate acts, although appearing to be isolated events
were part of the overall conspiracy and pattern of racketeering activity alleged herein rise to
the level of violations of 42 USC §1983.
JURISDICTION
AND VENUE
11)Plaintiffs bring this action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§1983 for violations of civil rights underthe First
and Fourteenth Amendmentsto the United States Constitution.
12)The case presents a federal
question within this Court's jurisdiction under Article III, §2 of the
United States Constitution and 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and1343.
13)Declaratory relief is authorized by
28 U.S.C. §§2201 and 2202.
14)This court has original
jurisdiction pursuant to the civil RICO remedies at 18 USC §1964, and the
holdings of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Chevron Corp. v. Donziger, 833.
F.3d.
15)This court has original
jurisdiction pursuant to Doe v. New York City Dep't of Soc. Servs., 709 F.2d
782 (2d Cir.), cert.
denied, 464 U.S.
864, 104 S. Ct. 195, 78 L. Ed. 2d 171 (1983); Doe v. New York City
Dep't of Soc. Servs., 649 F.2d 134 (2d Cir. 1981).
16)Plaintiff
also brings this action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics and 42 USC §1983 for violations of civil rights under the
First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution by
federal employees.
PROCEDURAL
HISTORY
17)Within
the statutory meaning of RICO as established by 18 USC §1961, adjudicated
by this court in the case Chevron
Corp. v. Donziger and later affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit, there were several acts of malicious prosecution
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
that
were initiated at the behest of the Defendants who are members of
Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi Jewish leadership in positions of
great power who are ensconced within governmental and corporate areas:
i.Uzamere v. Uzamere,
K-26332-07 (divorce action, please refer to Justice Sunshine’s decisions
dated January 12, 2009 and May 12, 2009 which ignored the notarized
affidavit of Plaintiff’s daughter Tara A. Uzamere, but gave credence to
the unauthenticated foreign counter-affidavit of Plaintiff’s husband former
Nigerian Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere pretending to be “Godwin Uzamere”
for which he was never arrested. Plaintiff alleges that the divorce was
never completed; she was publicly outed as a “wacko” anti-Semite by the
New York Daily News, arrested, placed in a mental institution but never
received reasonable accommodations based on being a “wacko” during the
entire divorce proceeding which was not completed. More than 10 years
later, the Plaintiff has never received any documentation confirming the
finalization of the marriage and alleges that she is still married to
former Nigerian Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere.
ii.United States of America v. Cheryl D. Uzamere, 1:08-cr-00114-jgm,
filed September 25, 2008; December 11, 2008.
iii.People v. Cheryl Uzamere,
2009KN087992, filed November 3, 2009, Dismissed: December 3, 2009.
iv.U.S.
Department of Homeland Security’s commencement in a criminal
investigation turned into interference in the Plaintiff’s psychiatric
treatment pursuant to a falsified by a National Security letter, dated
August 18, 2011 in which the Plaintiff was falsely accused of making
threats to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid call center (http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.net/audio_files/conversationwithcms1.mp3, advance to 24:30 minutes
to hear CMS worker say that the Plaintiff never threatened anyone).
v.United States of American v. Cheryl D. Uzamere, USDC
Violation Nos. 6185447, 6185448 (6185447 was deemed too insufficient to
prosecute); Filed: Dismissed: April 3, 2018.
18)On December 19, 2017, in response to Plaintiff’s
complaint to the Social Security Administration that Defendants New York
City Housing Authority, Affinity Federal Credit Union and Metavante
Corporation embezzled Plaintiff’s SSDI funds, U.S.D.C. Summons Nos.
6185447 and 6185448 charges were filed against the Plaintiff for which
she was required to appear at the United States Court for the Eastern
District of New York in response (6185447 was deemed too insufficient to
prosecute).
19)On March 12, 2018, the Plaintiff, having been denied
reasonable accommodations based on her having a serious mental illness
recognized by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and having been
assigned an attorney who prepared no answer in response to the
Government’s criminal violations, submitted a complaint to the U.S.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Department
of Justice’s Disability Right Section against all judges of the U.S.
District Court of the Eastern District of New York.
20)On March 27, 2018, the Plaintiff, having been denied
reasonable accommodations based on her having a serious mental illness
recognized by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and having been
assigned an attorney who prepared no answer in response to the
Government’s criminal violations, submitted a motion demanding the recusal
of all judges of the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of New
York.
21)On March 27, 2018, the Plaintiff, having been denied reasonable
accommodations based on her having a serious mental illness recognized by
the Americans with Disabilities Act, and having been assigned an attorney
who prepared no answer in response to the Government’s criminal
violations, submitted her demand for discovery and inspection government
records, in which she requested the “CCTV/surveillance camera records of
my activities with the Social Security Administration’s office at 3386
Crescent Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11208 that were reported between December
19, 2017 to the present.
22)On March 31, 2018, the Plaintiff, having been denied
reasonable accommodations based on her having a serious mental illness
recognized by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and having been
assigned an attorney who prepared no answer in response to the
Government’s criminal violations, submitted her amended demand for
discovery and inspection government records, in which she requested the
“CCTV/surveillance camera records of my activities with the Social
Security Administration’s office at 3386 Crescent Avenue, Brooklyn, New
York, 11208 that were reported between December 19, 2017 to the present.
23)On March 31, 2018, the Plaintiff, having been denied
reasonable accommodations based on her having a serious mental illness
recognized by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and having been
assigned an attorney who prepared no answer in
response to the Government’s criminal
violations, submitted her motion to dismiss the Government’s criminal
action for failure to state a cognizable offense.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
24)On April 3, 2018, the Government
dismissed U.S.D.C. Violation No. 6185448 against the Plaintiff.
25)From the time that the Plaintiff submitted her
demands for discovery and inspection of the Government’s records until
the present, the Defendants who are members of Babylonian Talmud-adherent
Ashkenazi Jewish leadership have influenced the Government to refuse to
respond to Plaintiff’s requests for discovery and inspection of their
records.
26)Since the dismissal of the last maliciously-prosecuted
criminal action at the behest of Defendants who are members of Babylonian
Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi Jewish leadership ensconced in positions of
great power within governmental and corporate areas, there have been
other acts of obstruction that continue up to the filing of this Verified
Complaint, including Defendant New York City Police Department’s constant
banning of the Plaintiff from public places while filing no criminal
charges or providing any written notice of any ban, based on what the
Plaintiff alleges is Defendant members of Babylonian Talmud-adherent
Ashkenazi Jewish leadership’s last-ditch effort to deprive the Plaintiff
of her First Amendment rights to free speech and to petition the
government for a redress of grievances by having Defendant New York City
Police Department’s officers “legally” murder the Plaintiff without due
process based on her violation of it arbitrary ban from public places to
surreptitiously enforce the spirit of the law associated with New York
State Executive Order No. 157 and New York State Legislative Sessions law
(2017-2018) banning the boycott of Israel or territories under Israel’s
control.
27)The Plaintiff alleges that the
enforcement ofNew York State
Executive Order No. 157 and it legislative counterpart, New York State
Legislative Sessions Law No. 2942—A are extension of the Babylonian
Talmudic doctrine Law of Moser, explained by Rabbi Michael J. Broyde at
the website http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/moser-broyde/index.html:
Even though Jewish law expects people to observe the
laws of the land, and even imposes that obligation as a religious duty,
the Talmud recounts - in a number of places - that it is prohibited to
inform on Jews to the secular government, even when their conduct is a
violation of secular law and even when their conduct is a violation of
Jewish law. While there are a number of exceptions to this prohibition
(which are explained further in this
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
section), the essential halacha was that Jewish law prohibits
such informing absent specific circumstances. Even is secular government
were to incorporate substantive Jewish law into secular law and punish
violations of what is, in effect, Jewish law, Jews would still be
prohibited from cooperating with such a system. Indeed, classical Jewish
law treats a person who frequently informs on others as a pursuer (a
rodef) who may be killed to prevent
him from informing, even without a formal court ruling (please refer to
Youtube videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdH6vRcN7qE and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8D4cVnnIU.
28)The Plaintiff further alleges that the primary purpose
for the promulgation of Defendant New York State’s Israel anti-boycott
laws is to facilitate kifala/employer-sponsored employment (now banned
virtually banned all over the world); the transporting of poor children
in Defendant New York State foster care system; the funding of
not-for-profit organizations that receive funding to help individuals in
various forms of distress and other political, social, and religious
programs that are fronts for the Babylonian Talmud-sanctioned trafficking
of children for the sex trade:
Talmud law
permits sexual intercourse between children and adults. This doctrine is
contained in a number of Mishnahs…
Again, there is
no prohibition of a sexual practice that would almost certainly cause
physical damage to a young girl due to the mismatched sizes of genitals
between an adult's penis and a child's vagina or anus…
We have seen in
Numbers 31:12-18 that Moses permitted grown men to use little girls as
concubines. In the Talmud, grown men are permitted to have sexual
intercourse with female babies and children, and homosexual relations
with boys younger than nine.
29)The
Plaintiff has filed several lawsuits in the past and is familiar with the
difficulty that federal district courts have experienced based on
Plaintiff’s inartfully drawn complaints.The Plaintiff is also familiar with her rights as they pertain to Haines v. Kerner, et al, 404 U.S. 519 (1972); however, in an effort not to misuse those rights associated with
the filing of lawsuits by individuals proceeding on their own behalf, and
to ensure that this honorable Court’s patience is not overly taxed, the
Plaintiff has attempted to borrow the verbiage of precedent-setting cases
associated with the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The
Plaintiff also employs persuasive argument by borrowing the verbiage of
precedent-setting cases for which enforcement is specific to the circuits
in which the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
respective
Courts of Appeals have rendered decisions; however, the Plaintiff assures
this Court that while the enforcement of precedent-setting cases decided
by other Courts of Appeals are persuasive authority in this Circuit, U.S.
Supreme Court case law, and the federal statutes on which other Courts of
Appeals (especially in the case of Jordahl
v. Brnovich, No. 18-16896, have
rendered precedent-setting decisions are mandatory authority.
STATEMENT
OF FACTS
New
York State’s Israel Anti-Boycott Law
30)On January 13, 2017, the New York State Legislature
amended the state finance law and the retirement and social security law,
in relation to purchasing restrictions (“the Act”). The Act provides, in
relevant part:
Section 1. The
state finance law is amended by adding a new section 165-b. As used in
this section, the following definitions apply:
"Boycott"
shall mean to engage in, promote, or encourage any activity that will
result in any person to abstain from commercial, social or political
relations with any allied nation, companies based in allied nations, or
territories controlled by an allied nation with the intent to penalize,
inflict or cause harm to an allied nation, its people or its commercial
products.
"Person"
shall mean any natural person, corporation, limited liability company,
unincorporated association or any nongovernmental entity, organization or
group.
2. (B) not later than ninety days after the effective date of this section, and then annually thereafter, the
commissioner shall develop and publish, using credible information available to the public, a list of persons determined by the commissioner, that have engaged in the boycotting
of any allied nation. The commissioner shall not include any person on the list required to be so developed and published if the commissioner
determines that such person engaging in boycotting an allied nation, engaged in such boycotting in order to comply with a provision
of law of an allied nation in which such person resides or conducts business operations. Such list, when developed and published,
shall be posted on the website of the office of generalservices.
3. (A) “a State
agency shall require all persons that submit a bid or offer in response
to a notice of procurement, or that propose to renew an existing
procurement contract, or that propose to assume the responsibility of a
contractor pursuant to a procurement contract, or otherwise propose to
enter into a contract with a state agency with respect to a contract for
commodities, services, construction, or contracts entered into pursuant
to section eight of the public buildings law or section thirty-eight of
the highway law, to certify, at the time the bid is submitted, or the
contract is renewed or assigned, that the person or the assignee is not
identified on the list developed and published pursuant to paragraph (B)
of subdivision two of this section, and all state agencies shall include
such certification information in the procurement record.
(B) all persons
that submit a bid or offer in response to a notice ofprocurement, or that propose to renew an
existing procurement contract with a state agency, or that propose to
assume the responsibility of a contractor pursuant to a procurement
contract with a state agency, or otherwise propose to enter into a
contract with a state agency with respect
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
to a contract
for commodities, services, construction, or contracts entered into
pursuant to section eight of the public buildings law or section
thirty-eight of the highway law, shall certify that they have not
boycotted any allied nations, and that they are not identified on the
developed and published pursuant to paragraph (B) of subdivision Two of
this section.
31)The Plaintiff alleges that superficially, the Act seeks
to suppress participation in political boycott campaigns aimed at Israel
and/or territories controlled by Israel, particularly Boycott, Divestment
and Sanctions (“BDS”) campaigns.These campaigns seek to apply economic pressure on Israel to
protest the Israeli government’s treatment of Palestinians and occupation
of the Palestinian territories.
32)New York State’s Executive Order No. 157 directing state
agencies and authorities to divest public funds state, inter alia:
·the State of Israel is a critical and
invaluable ally of the United States;
·the State of New York and Israel enjoy a
special historical relationship and share a commonly forged cultural
bond;
·the State of New York does not support
boycott related tactics that are used to threaten the sovereignty and
security of allies and trade partners of the United States;
·in 2005, elements of Palestinian civil
society issued a call for a Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)
campaign against Israel, coordinated by the Palestinian BDS National
Committee;
·the State of New York unequivocally rejects
the BDS campaign and stands firmly with Israel;
·the State of New York will not permit its
own investment activity to further the BDS campaign in any way, shape or
form, whether directly or indirectly.
The
Plaintiff’s Boycott Participation
33)The Plaintiff was raised as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses,
and as such, believes that there is no form of human government that can
sufficiently satisfy humans’ physical and spiritual needs outside of
Jehovah’s will, and that other religions that profess to obey Jehovah are
falseThe Plaintiff further
believes that Israel at one point, had a covenant relationship with
Jehovah God, but violated that covenant based on Israel’s worship of the
God Molech, which included the sacrificing of children by burning them to
death.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
34)The Plaintiff has no formal involvement with boycotting
Israel; however, the Plaintiff’s website http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.net makes it clear that the Plaintiff disagrees with
Israel, and its use of the Babylonian Talmud to advance dogma that
violates Jehovah’s righteous laws:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION AS TO
DEFENDANT NYCHA
TITLE II OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND ITS IMPLEMENTING
REGULATIONS
?.NYCHA is a public entity for the purposes of 42 U.S.C.
§ 12131(1).
?the Plaintiff is an "individual with a
disability" as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 12102(1)(A) and 28 C.F.R. §
35.104 and a "qualified individual with a disability" as
defined in 42 U.S.C. § 12131(2) and 28 C.F.R. § 35.104.
?.In failing to provide Plaintiff access to internet and
telephone services both her personal use and for use with him home-based
company, NYCHA has failed to afford the plaintiff an opportunity to
participate in and benefit from NYCHA housing that is equal to that
afforded others, provided a benefit that is not as effective in affording
an equal opportunity to obtain the same result, failed to provide
reasonable accommodations and modifications necessary to avoid
discrimination, used methods of program administration with a
discriminatory effect, and otherwise limited plaintiffs in the enjoyment
of rights, privileges, advantages and opportunities provided to others,
and otherwise discriminated against plaintiffs on the basis of disability
in violation of the ADA and its implementing regulations. 42 U.S.C. §
12132; 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(a), (b)(1)( )-(iv), (b)(3), (b)(7).
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION AS TO
DEFENDANT NYCHA
SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION
ACT AND
ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS
?.NYCHA receives federal financial assistance from HUD.
?.The plaintiff is an "otherwise qualified
individual with a disability" under 29 U.S.C. § 794(a).
?.Each of the individual plaintiffs is an
"individual with a disability" under 29 U.S.C. § 705(20)(B) and
an "individual with handicaps" under 24 C.F.R. § 8.3 and a
"qualified individual with handicaps" under 24 C.F.R. §8.4(b)(1).
?.In failing to provide Plaintiff access to internet and
telephone services both her personal use and for use with her home-based
company, NYCHA has failed to afford plaintiffs an opportunity to
participate in and benefit from NYCHA housing that is equal to that
afforded others, provided a benefit that is not as effective in affording
an equal opportunity to obtain the same result, failed to provide
reasonable accommodations and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
modifications
necessary to avoid discrimination, used methods of program administration
with a discriminatory effect, and otherwise limited plaintiffs in the
enjoyment of rights, privileges, advantages and opportunities provided to
others, and otherwise discriminated against plaintiffs solely by reason
of handicap and disability in violation of Section 504 of Rehabilitation
Act and its implementing regulations. 29 U.S.C. § 794(a); 24 C.F.R. §
8.4(b)(1)(ii)-(iv), (b)(1)(viii), (b)(2), (b)(4)(i)-( ).
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION AS TO
DEFENDANT NYCHA
FAIR HOUSING AMENDMENTS ACT AND
ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS
?.The Plaintiff has a "handicap" under 42
U.S.C. § 3604(0(2) and 24 C.F.R. § 100.201.
?.In failing to provide Plaintiff with access to
internet and telephone services both her personal use and for use with
her home-based company NYCHA has discriminated in the rental of dwellings
on the basis of handicap, discriminated in the provision of services and
facilities in connection with dwellings on the basis of handicap, and
refused to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices,
or services to individuals with handicaps when necessary to afford the
Plaintiff the opportunity to use and enjoy NYCHA housing in violation of
the FHAA and its implementing regulations. 42 U.S.C. § 3604(0(1)(A)-(B),
(f)(2)(A)-(B), (f)(3)(B); 24 C.F.R. §§ 100.202(a)(1)-(2),
100.202(b)(1)-(2), 100.204(a).
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION AS TO
DEFENDANT NYCHA
NEW YORK STATE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
?.The Plaintiff has a "disability" as defined
by § 292 (21)(a)- (b).
?.NYCHA's policy, practice, and custom of failing and
refusing to (a) provide the Plaintiff’s apartment with access to internet
and telephone service; and, (b) reasonably modify its policies,
practices, and procedures to provide an apartment free of mold and
moisture, and (c) otherwise make reasonable accommodations in rules,
policies, practices
policies,
practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to
afford a person with a disability equal opportunity to use and enjoy a
dwelling, including reasonable modification to common use portions of the
dwelling violates the Human Rights Law §296.2-a (d)(1)-(2).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FIFTH
CAUSE OF ACTION AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
AMERICANS
WITH DISABILITIES ACT:
CREATION
AND MAINTENANCE OF A HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT BASED ON THE STATUS OF HAVING A
MENTAL ILLNESS
?.Plaintiff repeats and realleges the above paragraphs.
?.Regarding Defendants, this claim is brought against
them individually and in their official capacities.
?.Plaintiff is an American citizen with a serious and
persistent mental illness. Plaintiff has a mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities.
?.Plaintiff is a qualified individual with disabilities
within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §12131(2).
?.Plaintiff is a descendant victim of the African
Holocaust in which Africans, whose sale was brokered by Jews and
kidnapped by whites, forever lost the ability to bear the correct
paternal name of her African male forebears; and having married Defendant
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, now retains the right from now to eternity to have
borne and to bear the name of Defendant Ehigie Edobor Uzamere; and that
the aforesaid right is retained by Tara A. Uzamere, the adult child of
the marriage between Plaintiff and Defendant Ehigie Edobor Uzamere., and
for her progeny to bear the correct Edo/Bini name and culture associated
with of Defendant Ehigie Edobor Uzamere.
?.Defendants owed Plaintiff the duty, pursuant to Title
II of the Americans With Disabilities Act, to prohibit the practice of
disability discrimination. As public entities, Defendants owed Plaintiff
the duty to comply with Title II regulations by the U.S. Department of
Justice. These regulations cover access to all programs and services
offered by the entity. Access includes physical access described in the
ADA Standards for Accessible Design and programmatic access that might be
obstructed by discriminatory policies or procedures of the entity.
?.Defendants failed in their duty to meet the
obligations as detailed in Title II of the Americans With Disabilities
Act. Defendants continue to discriminate against Plaintiff based
on Plaintiff's status of having a mental illness because Plaintiff
will not stop filing complaints against Defendants who are members of
Babylonian Talmud-adherent Ashkenazi Jewish leadership.
?.Plaintiff suffered and continues to suffer injury
because Plaintiff is still under attack by all the Defendants, who, at
the clandestine behest of Defendant Garaufis, Judge Schack, Judge
Sunshine and Judge Gerstein, have continued the same government-wide
hostile environment that Plaintiff complained about in her prior
lawsuit, Uzamere vs. Cuomo, et al, 11-cv-2831/11-2713-cv.
Defendants continue to discriminate against Plaintiff by using
Plaintiff's status of having a mental illness to falsely and to publicly
hold out that judicial Defendants will not allow Plaintiff to file
criminal and civil complaints against corrupt Jewish Defendants corrupt
immigration attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro and Jack Gladstein
because Plaintiff's complaints are unintelligible based on her status of
having a mental illness. Defendants New York State, New York State Office
of Mental Health, New York City, New York City Health and Hospitals
Corporation, Brookdale Hospital Medical Center and their employees
intentionally misdiagnosed Plaintiff as psychotic and violent to deprive
Plaintiff of her right to due process and equal protection under the law.
Defendants accused Plaintiff of the commission of 18 USC §115,
threatening a federal employee and discriminated against the Plaintiff by
using her status of having a mental illness as an excuse to deprive her
of the right to defend herself in criminal court against said criminal
charges. Proof of Defendant New York State's and New York City's
continued conspiracy to attack the Plaintiff based on her status of
having a mental illness is at http://articles.nydailynews.com/2009-11-05/local/17938323_1_supreme-court-judge-criminal-court; and http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202435221996&slreturn=20120729115138; see Daily News article dated November
5, 2009 in which staff writer Scott Shifrel publicly defames Plaintiff as
a “wacko.”
?.The U.S. Supreme Court recognize that discrimination
based on disability as an injury. The Supreme Court held in Olmstead
v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), that “[u]njustified isolation . .
. is properly regarded as discrimination based on disability,” observing
that “institutional placement of persons who can handle and benefit from
community settings perpetuates unwarranted assumptions that persons so
isolated are incapable of or unworthy of participating in community
life.” 527 U.S. at 597, 600.
?Plaintiff submits that Defendants' violation of the
Title II, Americans With Disabilities Mandate to integrate Plaintiff also
violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments,
the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and 42 USC §1985,
conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, such that Plaintiff's Verified
Complaint rises to the level of an action in the manner of Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 with
regard to those Defendants who are natural persons. Plaintiff understands
the U.S. Supreme Court's application of Bivens to natural persons and its
refusal to extend Bivens to agencies.
SIXTH
CAUSE OF ACTION AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
THE
REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973
?.Plaintiff repeats and realleges the above paragraphs.
?.With regard to Defendants, this claim is brought
against them individually and in their official capacities.
?.Plaintiff is an American citizen with a serious and
persistent mental illness. Plaintiff has a mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities.
?.Plaintiff is a qualified individual with disabilities
within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §12131(2).
?.Plaintiff is a descendant victim of the African
Holocaust in which Africans, whose sale was brokered by Jews and kidnapped
by whites, forever lost the ability to bear the correct paternal name of
her African male forebears; and having married Defendant Ehigie Edobor
Uzamere, now retains the right from now to eternity to have borne and to
bear the name of Defendant Ehigie Edobor Uzamere; and that the aforesaid
right is retained by Tara A. Uzamere, the adult child of the marriage
between Plaintiff and Defendant Ehigie Edobor Uzamere., and for her
progeny to bear the correct Edo/Bini name and culture associated with of
Defendant Ehigie Edobor Uzamere.
?.Defendants owed Plaintiff the duty, pursuant to the
Federal Rehabilitation of 1973 not to engage in discriminating against
the Plaintiff, based on her status of having a mental illness; and as
recipients of government funds, to assist in the rehabilitation of
Plaintiff. As public entities, Defendants owed Plaintiff the duty to
comply with the Federal Rehabilitation of 1978, as these regulations
cover access to all programs and services offered by the entity in the
receipt of federal funds.
?.Defendants failed in their duty to meet the
obligations as detailed in the Federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973yTitle
II of the Americans With Disabilities Act. Defendants continue to
discriminate against Plaintiff based on Plaintiff's status of having
a mental illness because Plaintiff will not stop filing complaints
against corrupt Jews immigration attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro
and Jack Gladstein.
?.Plaintiff suffered and continues to suffer injury
because Plaintiff is still under attack by all the Defendants, who, at
the clandestine behest of Defendant Garaufis, Judge Schack, Judge
Sunshine and Judge Gerstein, have continued the same government-wide hostile
environment that Plaintiff complained about in her prior lawsuit, Uzamere
vs. Cuomo, et al, 11-cv-2831/11-2713-cv. Defendants continue to
discriminate against Plaintiff by using Plaintiff's status of having a
mental illness to falsely and to publicly hold out that judicial
Defendants will not allow Plaintiff to file criminal and civil complaints
against corrupt Jewish Defendants corrupt immigration attorneys Allen E.
Kaye, Harvey Shapiro and Jack Gladstein because Plaintiff's complaints
are unintelligible based on her status of having a mental illness.
Defendants New York State, New York State Office of Mental Health, New
York City, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Brookdale
Hospital Medical Center and their employees intentionally misdiagnosed
Plaintiff as psychotic and violent to deprive Plaintiff of her right to
due process and equal protection under the law. Defendants accused
Plaintiff of the commission of 18 USC §115, threatening a federal
employee and discriminated against the Plaintiff by using her status of
having a mental illness as an excuse to deprive her of the right to
defend herself in criminal court against said criminal charges. Proof of
Defendant New York State's and New York City's continued conspiracy to
attack the Plaintiff based on her status of having a mental illness is
at http://articles.nydailynews.com/2009-11-05/local/17938323_1_supreme-court-judge-criminal-court; and http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202435221996&slreturn=20120729115138; see Daily News article dated November
5, 2009 in which staff writer Scott Shifrel publicly defames Plaintiff as
a “wacko.”
?.The U.S. Supreme Court recognize that discrimination
based on disability as an injury. The Supreme Court held in Olmstead
v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), that “[u]njustified isolation . .
. is properly regarded as discrimination based on disability,” observing
that “institutional placement of persons who can handle and benefit from
community settings perpetuates unwarranted assumptions that persons so
isolated are incapable of or unworthy of participating in community
life.” 527 U.S. at 597, 600.
?Plaintiff submits that Defendants' violation of the
Title II, Americans With Disabilities Mandate to integrate Plaintiff also
violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments,
the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and 42 USC §1985,
conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, such that Plaintiff's Verified
Complaint rises to the level of an action in the manner of Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 with
regard to those Defendants who are natural persons.
Plaintiff understands the U.S. Supreme Court's application of Bivens
to natural persons and its refusal to extend Bivens to agencies.
SEVENTH
CAUSE OF ACTION AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
ARTICLE
15 OF NEW YORK STATE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
CREATION
AND MAINTENANCE OF A HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT BASED ON THE STATUS OF HAVING A
MENTAL ILLNESS
?.start here
EIGHTH
CAUSE OF ACTION AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
IMPLIED
CAUSE OF ACTION/BIVENS AS TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
FOR
VIOLATIONS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
?.start here
NINTH
CAUSE OF ACTION AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
C42
USC §1983, CIVIL ACTION FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS
FOR
VIOLATIONS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
?.Plaintiff repeats and realleges the above paragraphs.
?.Regarding all Defendants, this claim is brought
against them individually and in their official capacities.
?.The Plaintiff is an American citizen with a serious
and persistent mental illness. Plaintiff has a mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities.
?.Plaintiff is a qualified individual with disabilities
within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §12131(2).
?.Plaintiff is a descendant victim of the African
Holocaust in which Africans, whose sale was brokered and monopolized by
Babylonian Talmud-adherent Jews for the sole purpose of acquiring
nonconsenting individuals for the trafficking of humans to create a state
of psychological pain (terror, humiliation) to be sexually aroused as a
substitute for the ultimate goal of anally raping children, especially
boys; and that the long-standing, Babylonian Talmudic doctrine associated
with fomenting fighting words of weaponized hatred to facilitate the
acquisition of children for the sex trade was accomplished when the
Plaintiff and her children were terrorized by being separated and kept
apart to satiate the insatiable sexual addiction/paraphilia identified by
the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Volume V’s as sexual sadism
disorder; that the Plaintiff’s children were placed in Defendant New York
State’s and New York City’s, Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi
Jew-controlled foster care system, where Plaintiff alleges that her son,
David Paul Walker was subjected to psychological pain and sodomized, and
where the Plaintiff daughter Tara A. Uzamere was subjected to
psychological pain and sexually molested, and has, until the present,
lost the ability to bear the correct paternal name of her African male
forebears.
?.Defendants owed Plaintiff the
duty not to engage in actions designed to blacklist Plaintiff; and to not
engage in deprivation the Plaintiff of her constitutional use the guise that
Defendants’ acts were legitimate acts brought on by wrongful acts of the
Plaintiff. Defendants owed Plaintiff the duty not to render
Plaintiff persona non grata based on the illegal
enforcement of the Talmudic doctrine Law of the Moser, that
prohibits individuals from indirectly or directly filing complaints
against fellow Jews who have violated secular law.
?.Defendants failed to meet their obligation to not
engage in those behaviors that are indicative of a
racketeering-influenced, corrupt organization as detailed in 18 USC 18
USC §§1961–1968. Defendants engaged in racketeering for the sole purpose
of violating the Plaintiff’s constitutional rights.
?.Plaintiff suffered and continues to suffer injury
because she is still under attack by all the have continued the same
government-wide hostile environment about which Plaintiff has complained
in prior lawsuits.
?.Defendants failed to meet the obligations as detailed
in 42 USC §1983.Defendants
blacklisting the Plaintiff from the Defendant New York State courts, from
the federal courts, and from receiving governmentally-funded for the
primary purpose of advancing the Talmudic doctrine Law of the
Moser, to hide Babylonian Talmud-adherent Ashkenazi Jewish leaders’
predilection for children’s anuses, and to hide the sexually sadistic
harassment associated with terrorizing nonconsenting individuals until
such time that anally raping children becomes normalized.
?.Plaintiff suffered and continues
to suffer injury because she is still under attack by all the Defendants.
TENTH
CAUSE OF ACTION AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
CIVIL
ACTION FOR RICO/RACKETEERING AND CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF
RACKETEERING ACTIVITY
CHEVRON CORP. V. DONZIGER
?.Plaintiff repeats and realleges the above paragraphs.
?.Regarding all Defendants, this claim is brought
against them individually and in their official capacities.
?.The Plaintiff is an American citizen with a serious
and persistent mental illness. Plaintiff has a mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities.
?.Plaintiff is a qualified individual with disabilities
within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §12131(2).
?.Plaintiff is a descendant victim of the African
Holocaust in which Africans, whose sale was brokered and monopolized by
Babylonian Talmud-adherent Jews for the sole purpose of acquiring
nonconsenting individuals for the trafficking of humans to create a state
of psychological pain (terror, humiliation) to be sexually aroused as a
substitute for the ultimate goal of anally raping children, especially
boys; and that the long-standing, Babylonian Talmudic doctrine associated
with fomenting fighting words of weaponized hatred to facilitate the
acquisition of children for the sex trade was accomplished when the
Plaintiff and her children were terrorized by being separated and kept
apart to satiate the insatiable sexual addiction/paraphilia identified by
the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Volume V’s as sexual sadism disorder;
that the Plaintiff’s children were placed in Defendant New York State’s
and New York City’s, Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi Jew-controlled
foster care system, where Plaintiff alleges that her son, David Paul
Walker was subjected to psychological pain and sodomized, and where the
Plaintiff daughter Tara A. Uzamere was subjected to psychological pain
and sexually molested, and has, until the present, lost the ability to
bear the correct paternal name of her African male forebears.
?.Defendants owed Plaintiff the
duty not to engage in racketeering behavior.
?.Defendants failed to meet their obligation to not
engage in those behaviors that are indicative of a
racketeering-influenced, corrupt organization as detailed in 18 USC 18
USC §§1961–1968. Defendants engaged in racketeering for the sole purpose
of violating the Plaintiff’s constitutional rights.
?.Plaintiff suffered and continues to suffer injury
because she is still under attack by all the have continued the same
government-wide hostile environment about which Plaintiff has complained
in prior lawsuits.
?.Plaintiff submits that Defendants' commission of
racketeering violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and
42 USC §1983, conspiracy against civil rights such that Plaintiff's
Verified Complaint rises to the level of an action in the manner of Bivens
v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 with regard to the Defendants.
![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_6_uzamere_v_various_ashkenazi_leaders_and_ashkenazi_judaism_as_a_hate_groups_files/image138.png)
![WTC Falling Death2[3]](chapter_6_uzamere_v_various_ashkenazi_leaders_and_ashkenazi_judaism_as_a_hate_groups_files/image206.png)
![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_6_uzamere_v_various_ashkenazi_leaders_and_ashkenazi_judaism_as_a_hate_groups_files/image298.png)
