|
|
THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s
DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL SADISM
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual
Sadism Disorder Diagnostic
Criteria 302.84 (F65.52)
Over
a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the
physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by
fantasies, urges, or behaviors.
The
individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or
the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or
impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
Diagnostic Features
The
diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to individuals
who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those who deny
any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another
individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
.
. .Examples of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or
psychological suffering of another individual include individuals known to
have inflicted pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions
but who deny any urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may
further claim that known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional
or nonsexual. Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the
infliction of pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not
report any significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or
psychological suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny
having urges or fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it
follows that they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially
impaired by such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual
sadism disorder despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior
constitutes clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual sadism
(by satisfying Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their
paraphilically motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress,
harm, or risk of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B).
"Recurrent"
sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on
a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more
victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying
this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and
suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a
strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple
victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient
but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if
the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.
  
What the Babylonian Talmud says about the
worship of Molech: Mishnah. He
who gives of his seed to Molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers it to
Molech and causes it to pass through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the reverse, he incurs no
penalty, unless he does both.
Gemara.
The Mishnah teaches idolatry and giving to Molech. R(abbi)
Abin said: Our Mishnah is in accordance with the
view that Molech worship is not idolatry.
Informing
on Fellow Jews who Commit Crimes:
Mesira
in Modern Times
(Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Abodah
Zarah, Folio 26b)
Rabbi Michael J. Broyde*
The S. Daniel Abraham &
Ira L. Rennert
Torah Ethics Project
The Orthodox Caucus
Toronto, Canada
Netivot HaTorah
Day School
October 19, 2001, at 8:00 p.m.
Even
though Jewish law expects people to observe the laws of the land, and even
imposes that obligation as a religious duty, the Talmud recounts - in a
number of places - that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular
government, even when their conduct is a violation of secular law and even
when their conduct is a violation of Jewish law...Even is secular government...incorporate(s)
substantive Jewish law into secular law and punish violations of what is, in
effect, Jewish law, Jews would still be prohibited from cooperating with such
a system. Indeed, classical Jewish law treats a person who frequently informs
on others as a pursuer (a
rodef) who may be killed to
prevent him from informing, even without a formal court ruling.
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976
audiobook murdered 30 days after this interview (click on video to hear Youtube interview). In this video, Mr. Rosenthal talked
about the Ashkenazi Jewish plan to take over the United States and the world.
The Lost
Item of a Gentile: “If his intention is that he, and not
the faith or Israel, should be praised, or because he loves the Gentile and
has mercy on him, it is forbidden [to return the Gentile’s lost item]”)
Rabbis Say It’s OK to Kill Goyim:
This is not science fiction people. This is not said by some anti-Semitic KKK
or Neo-Nazis these are Rabbis saying it’s OK to kill non-Jews including
children. I have found most of the most damning information about Jewish
crimes comes from Jewish sources not so called anti-Semitic.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
Conspiracy of Silence – Banned Documentary: (click on any
photo to see Youtube video)
Conspiracy
of Silence is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a U.S. child sex
abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government.
Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a
highly decorated Vietnam war veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator,
Conspiracy of Silence reveals how rogue elements at all levels of government
have been involved in systematic child sex abuse and pedophilia to feed the
base desires of key politicians.
Paul Bonacci: The Murder [1985 --
GRAPHIC! click on photos below to see Youtube
video)
Paul Bonacci was one of many children who were taken from
Nebraska’s Boys Town foster care/adoption network, brought to the White House
and savagely raped. In this video, Mr. Bonacci describes being taken from the
White House with Nicholas and an unnamed boy. Paul and Nicholas were forced
to rape the boy at gunpoint by the person who filmed the event. Later the
unnamed child was sodomized by the person making the video until his anus
bled, kicked repeatedly in the head and then shot to death – all after being
raped in the White House by Ashkenazi/Jewish and non-Ashkenazi/Jewish
politicians and corporate leaders. Also see https://youtu.be/8b61iIQCapY.
Larry King: Overachiever
Editor’s
Note: Donald Gregg, National Security Advisor to George H.W. Bush was
tasked with silencing those involved. He turned to the CIA.
The Franklin Scandal was only one aspect of a much larger “call boy”
operation moving children and teenagers, picked up from Boys
Town, Catholic orphanages and off the streets, and housed in Washington
and New York primarily.
http://come-and-hear.com/editor/br_3.html
Click
on the two photos above to see video.
Israel’s
first female pimp, Angelique Sabag Gautiller, Israel's first female pimp and one of many
whore houses in Tel Aviv, Israel that Israeli pimps use to force beautiful,
delicate White ladies from Russia and Slavic countries who have been tricked
and lured with promises of respectable jobs in Israel and then forced to part
with their virginity and gang raped every night by sexually perverted Israeli
and Arab men.
·
How 11 New York City Babies Contracted Herpes Through - Health;
·
Baby Dies of Herpes Virus in Ritual Circumcision in NYC Orthodox ...;
·
Herpes cases among babies linked to ultra-Orthodox Jewish;
·
NYC, Orthodox Jews in talks over ritual after herpes cases - USA Today;
·
11 Babies Infected with Herpes in New York - Sandra Rose;
·
CDC: 11 infants contracted herpes due to controversial Jewish ...;
·
New York Baby Infected with Herpes After Metzitza
B'peh;
·
New case of neonatal herpes caused by Jewish ... - New York Post;
·
Orthodox Rabbis Fight NYC's Effort to Warn Parents About Herpes ...
Jewish Wisdom: What is a Goy?
Talmudic Jews
'Non-Jews Goyim Are Beasts to
Serve
Us as Slaves'
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293:
"AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN (Breishit 9:25):
(Commentary omitted) ...R. Huna also said in R. Joseph's name: You [i.e. Noah
is speaking to Ham) have prevented me from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned.
R. Chiyya said: Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark, therefore Ham came
forth black-skinned while the dog publicly exposed its copulation.
N.Y. State Lawmaker Apologizes
for Blackface Costume
By Sonia Kennebeck,
CNN
Tue February 26, 2013
Story Highlights
Brooklyn
Democrat Dov Hikind dressed in blackface for a
Purim party.
He
apologized to "anyone who was offended" but added, "that was
not the intention."
One of his Assembly colleagues calls the apology "a
beginning" but inadequate.
Yair Netanyahu’s Night of
Debauchery Revealed in Bombshell Recordings: Younger Netanyahu heard asking his
friend, a gas tycoon's son, for NIS 400 for strippers, saying he owed him for
$20 billion deal advanced by PM (click on photo to hear Yair
audiotape)
“Rachel” (Vicki Polin) on Oprah
Winfrey Show Discussing “Rachel’s” Ashkenazi Jewish Parents Introducing Her
to Ashkenazi Jewish Ritual Murder and Rape of Children (click on photo to see
Youtube video).
The
Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of the
victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for
Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is
demonic torture, sex and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as
sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including
non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping
members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping and killing. Like
the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved
force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race,
financial issues and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all
junkies use excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political,
religious, social or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless
they are stopped, they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite
for torture, deviant sex and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left
unchecked, will be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff
addicts. Nothing more – nothing less.
![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_106_molech_fomented_anti_black_racism_at_howard_university_files/image373.png)
Ashkenazi
sexual sadist achieving climax by using a whip to rape a helpless human being
to death.
https://youtu.be/Mg_13WJ4gDo;
https://youtu.be/MtKBjPxGmyc
JOWERS, FEDERAL AGENCIES FOUND
LIABLE IN MURDERING DR. KING
Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther
King, III, Bernice King, Dexter Scott King and Yolanda King, Plaintiffs, v.
T.D. Loyd Jowers and
Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, Defendants.
Yemeni
child stolen and given to Ashkenazi woman
Adult
child with biological mother
Israel
Celebrates Successful 9/11 Operation on Purim Holiday (click on photo to read article)
Israeli
schoolchildren dressed up as the burning
Twin
Towers. Costume won best prize.
Countries
that lost citizens on 9/11:
http://brilliantmaps.com/9-11-victims;
Israel
Did 9/11; Dr. Alan Sabrosky (click on photo
to
see Youtube video)
9/11
Alleged Hijackers Alive and Well (click on
photo
to see Youtube video)
![WTC Falling Death2[3]](chapter_106_molech_fomented_anti_black_racism_at_howard_university_files/image407.png)
 
 
|
The Crimes of Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere
“Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one
Jehovah.”
שְׁמַע,יִשְׂרָאֵל: יְהוָהאֱלֹהֵינוּ,יְהוָהאֶחָד
“Jehovah went on speaking to Moses, saying: “…’Any man of
Israel and any foreigner who resides in Israel who gives any of his offspring
to Molech should be put to death without fail…I myself will set my face
against that man, and I will cut him off from among his people, because he
has given some of his offspring to Molech and has defiled my holy place and
has profaned my holy name. If the people of the land should deliberately
close their eyes to what that man does when he gives his offspring to Molech
and they do not put him to death, then I myself will certainly set my face
against that man and his family. I will cut off that man from his people
along with all who join him in prostituting themselves to Molech.
 ![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_106_molech_fomented_anti_black_racism_at_howard_university_files/image455.png)     
      
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 106:
Molech-Fomented
Anti-Black Racism at Howard University
Howard U's Civil Rights Staff
Create Schmokescreen; discriminates against
identity fraud victim based on her mental status
|
|
Professor Taslitz:
Assuming that you are an Ashkenazi, please answer the following
questions:
1.
Do my allegations regarding
the facilitation of immigration and identity fraud by fellow
Ashkenazi attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro and Bernard Rostanski (see below) appear to be true (especially
considering that they have not sued me for defamation per se?
2.
If so, and if 18
USC 3290 could be used to
prosecute the aforesaid attorneys, would you assist in doing so if you
were called on to do so? Have you ever assisted in the prosecution,
indictment, trial and conviction of any member of the Ashkenazim when
the plaintiff was a non-Ashkenazi? If you were called upon to do
so, would you assist in the prosecution of an Ashkenazi if the
plaintiff was a non-Ashkenazi?
3.
Have you litigated a case (criminal or civil) in
which the defendant is an Ashkenazi, the plaintiff is a
non-Ashkenazi, the judge was a non-Ashkenazi, and the Ashkenazi
defendant lost the case? (Calling me "anti-Semitic",
"mentally ill" or other silly names like a menstruating
female is a sissified attempt at willful
blindness. Whether I am
mentally ill, a hater of Jews or any other dumb-assed name that accentuates
my social position over my legal status
is not relevant. Either I am telling the truth, or I am not.)
|
" Hell,
we're getting funding from the Ashkenazim, so if we have to keep silent
and let members of the Ashkenazi community
violate the rights of a few niggers,
that's okay with me!...the
true words of not-for-profit, "civil rights" (what a
joke!) "funding whores."
Ashkenazim's Faithful Schvartze
Lap Dogs -- with "licenses" -- not to challenge law, but to be
obedient to their Ashkenazi funders -- even if members of that community
violate the rights of helpless blacks (remember: it is quite common for
an obedient dog to be associated with a license -- but the license
belongs to the owner).
|
·
Misleads disabled
identity fraud by dispensing useless/untrue legal referral information
·
Receipt
of Ashkenazi-Jewish funding is its real reason not to
help disabled identity fraud victim oppressed by Ashkenazi
judiciary's determination not to bring corrupt Ashkenazi attorneys
Kaye, Shapiro and Rostanski to justice
·
Use identity fraud's
victim's mental status to pretend that her allegations are not true;
·
Ashkenazi-Jewish
television and radio news outlets will only report if disabled,
non-Ashkenazi identity fraud victim is made to appear anti-Semitic and
corrupt, immigration/identity fraud facilitating Ashkenazi attorneys
Kaye, Shapiro and Rostanski are made to
appear to be the victims
·
NAACP, National Action
Network and other African-American civil rights groups will not assist
blacks whose constitutional rights are violated by Ashkenazi Jews
because the Ashkenazim are a funding source
·
(Please
note: It is not illegal or anti-Semitic to bring an Ashkenazi-Jew
to justice who has violated the law)
|
|
|
Vicarious liability is a form of
strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine
of agency respondeat
superior the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their
subordinate, or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third
party that had the "right, ability or duty to control" the
activities of a violator.
|
|
Willful blindness (sometimes called
ignorance of law, willful ignorance or contrived ignorance or Nelsonian
knowledge) is a term used in law to
describe a situation in which an individual seeks to avoid civil or
criminal liability for a wrongful act by intentionally putting himself
in a position where he will be unaware of facts which would render him
liable. For example, in a number of cases,
persons transporting packages containing illegal drugs have asserted
that they never asked what the contents of the packages were, and
therefore lacked the requisite intent to break the law. Such defenses
have not succeeded, as courts have
been quick to determine that the defendant
should have known what was in the package and exercised criminal recklessness by failing to find
out.
A
famous example of such a defense being denied occurred in In re Aimster
Copyright Litigation, 334 F.3d 643 (7th Cir. 2003) , in which the defendants
argued that their file-swapping
technology was designed in such a way that they had no way of
monitoring the content of swapped files, and suggested that their
inability to monitor the activities of users meant that they could not
be contributing to copyright infringement
by the users. The court held that this was willful blindness on the
defendant's part and would not constitute a defense to a claim of
contributory infringement.
|
|
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission
of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and
does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other
person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or
both.
|
|
|
Letter
of Complaint to Washington Disciplinary Committee
|
September 17, 2010
Katherine A. Mazzaferri
Executive Director
The District of Columbia Bar
1101 K Street NW, Suite 200
Washington DC 20005-4210
Dear Ms. Mazzaferri:
First, please allow me to
state unequivocally that rage based on my belief that my rights were
violated by an attorney at Howard University is an absolute motivating
factor in the preparation of this correspondence. I assure you, however,
that in spite of my rage, I have not, and will not participate in the
defamation of any of the attorneys who I believe are responsible for
disobeying federal law, specifically, 18 USC $4, misprision of felony,
and for causing the intentional infliction of emotional distress based on
knowingly providing me with legal referrals for which I allege that they
knew or should have known that I am not eligible.
Secondly, while I file this
complaint against three attorneys associated with Howard University, two
of the attorneys were not actively involved with what I alleged to be the
subordinate attorney's indiscretion in handling my case. With the two
supervisory attorneys, I rely on the legal principle of respondeat superior the responsibility of the
superior for the acts of their subordinate, or, in a broader sense, the
responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability or
duty to control" the activities of a violator. In addition, I have
uploaded this correspondence to http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.net/husl.net. I did this to give Dean Schmoke, Aberson Francois
and the unidentified employee from HUSL's Civil Rights Clinic a chance to
publicly defend themselves.
On September 16, 2010, I
traveled all the way from Brooklyn, New York to Washington, D.C to speak
with someone at Howard University with regard to
my being a victim of an ongoing federal crime involving what I allege to
be the encroachment of the Ashkenazi-Jewish religion into judicial
affairs. I spoke with a woman at the Civil Rights Clinic whose name I do
not now remember. I provided the woman with several legal documents that
establish irrefutable proof of my allegations.
The woman refused to offer
Howard University's legal services based on her saying that the school
could not offer services to New Yorkers for legal issues stemming from
New York even if the issues are federal in nature. In addition, the
woman, who I allege to be an attorney, provided me with referral
information for which I believe that I am not eligible.
That I am a victim of an
ongoing federal crimes is not speculation. I have provided proof of my
assertions. I allege that because of one, some or all of Howard
University's funding sources are Ashkenazi Jewish, and that Howard U. in
a position where, if a prospective client complaints that his/her rights
were violated by someone who is a member of the Ashkenazi Jewish
community, Howard U. will not take the case. In addition, I believe that with regard to the woman with whom I spoke, I alleged
that my attempts to play attorney garnered disrespect and spite that
resulted in the attorney's giving me useless legal referrals. As an
attorney, she knew or should have known that the information that she
gave me was useless. In ghetto, vernacular, she was bitchy.
The fact is, I do not expect
that you will do much or anything at all. I expect that, as in other
cases, the Ashkenazi-Jewish employees at your office have more power than
non-Ashkenazi employees and will require your absolute obedience in not
responding to my complaint, lest you lose your job and your reputation.
The Ashkenazi-Jewish community has that kind of power and they are
ruthless. If you do not believe me, please view the web page that I
mentioned in this correspondence. Among other documents for which
Ashkenazi-Jewish immigration attorneys Allen E. Kaye, Harvey Shapiro and
Bernard Rostanski facilitated my ex-husband's
immigration and identity fraud is my daughter's birth certificate. My
daughter's birth certificate has borne the fictitious name Godwin Uzamere
from her birth until today. My daughter is 29 years old.
The crimes I reported to
Howard U. require persons to obey 18 USC 4 and report federal crimes. The
woman against whom I file this report failed to do so, and her
supervisors, Aberson Francois and Dean Schmoke, failed to ensure that the unknown employee
did her job.
While I understand that your
agency will in all probability not do anything, I am not in fear of your
lack of participation. Justice always starts with the cry for it, and
just like African Americans cried for justice hundreds of years before
they were heard, eventuality they were heard.
Do not underestimate my
resolve to obtain justice. My website shows the entire world that I
cannot be frightened to stop. I will bother you, the president of the
United States and everyone on the planet earth until someone listens to
me.
Thank you for taking time out
of your busy schedule to review my complaint.
Respectfully,
Cheryl
D. Uzamere
/cdu
|
|
Dean Schmoke's and Aberson Francois' Civil Rights Clinic's subordinate
openly admitted to spending only a brief amount of time reviewing proof
of the immigration and identity fraud that was committed against
her. Dean Schmoke and Aberson Francos
subordinate knew or should have known that: 1) as an individual who is
not a defendant in a federal or any other case, identity fraud
victim would not be eligible for services; and 2) that identity fraud
victim would not be eligible for services with Universal Legal Services
because she does not live in its catchment area. Why
did subordinate viciously refer identity fraud victim to places
where she could not get help? (below are the useless referrals in
the subordinate's own handwriting)
|
|
|
HUSL's Civil Rights Division's employee's stupid,
vicious, amoral admission of "briefly reviewing"
identity fraud victim's complaints is her tacit admission of employing willful blindness to refuse to see proof of
identity fraud victim's irrefutable assertions. By the way,
neither Dean Schmoke, Aberson
Fran篩s
can challenge me with defamation per quod or per se,
because truth is an affirmative defense to the charge of defamation
(unless their case is assigned to a corrupt Ashkenazi judge -- who may
be one of HUSL's funders).
|
|
|
HUSL's Civil Rights Division's employee's stupid,
vicious, amoral admission of "briefly reviewing"
identity fraud victim's complaints is her tacit admission of employing willful blindness to refuse to see proof of identity
fraud victim's irrefutable assertions. By the way, neither Dean Schmoke, Aberson Francois
can challenge me with defamation per quod or per se,
because truth is an affirmative defense to the charge of defamation
(unless their case is assigned to a corrupt Ashkenazi judge -- who may
be one of HUSL's funders).
|
|
|
HUSL's Civil Rights Division's employee's stupid,
vicious, amoral admission of "briefly reviewing"
identity fraud victim's complaints is her tacit admission of employing willful blindness to refuse to see proof of
identity fraud victim's irrefutable assertions. By the way,
neither Dean Schmoke, Aberson
Francois can challenge me with defamation per quod or per
se, because truth is an affirmative defense to the charge of
defamation (unless their case is assigned to a corrupt Ashkenazi judge
-- who may be one of HUSL's funders).
|
|
|
HUSL's Civil Rights Division's employee's stupid,
vicious, amoral admission of "briefly reviewing"
identity fraud victim's complaints is her tacit admission of employing willful blindness to refuse to see proof of
identity fraud victim's irrefutable assertions. By the way,
neither Dean Schmoke, Aberson
Francois can challenge me with defamation per quod or per
se, because truth is an affirmative defense to the charge of
defamation (unless their case is assigned to a corrupt Ashkenazi judge
-- who may be one of HUSL's funders).
|
|
|
HUSL's Civil Rights Division's employee's stupid,
vicious, amoral admission of "briefly reviewing"
identity fraud victim's complaints is her tacit admission of employing willful blindness to refuse to see proof of
identity fraud victim's irrefutable assertions. By the way,
neither Dean Schmoke, Aberson
Francois can challenge me with defamation per quod or per
se, because truth is an affirmative defense to the charge of
defamation (unless their case is assigned to a corrupt Ashkenazi judge
-- who may be one of HUSL's funders).
|
|
|
HUSL's Civil Rights Division's employee's stupid,
vicious, amoral admission of "briefly reviewing"
identity fraud victim's complaints is her tacit admission of employing willful blindness to refuse to see proof of
identity fraud victim's irrefutable assertions. By the way,
neither Dean Schmoke, Aberson
Francois can challenge me with defamation per quod or per
se, because truth is an affirmative defense to the charge of
defamation (unless their case is assigned to a corrupt Ashkenazi judge
-- who may be one of HUSL's funders).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
